janjetina
Arcane
I took a quick look and I saw what he claims to be. In any case a blog of some guy, whoever he is, is not a reliable source of information unless you can verify the information given. Especially when its a blog obviously targeted against or in favor of specific views, for whatever reasonYeah isn't it something when someone rolls his eyes on an open-source knowledge DB (which obviously is never to be fully trusted but still..) but doesn't when he sees sources like "catholiceducation" and "historyforatheists" ?When i see wikipedia source,i roll my eyes so hard that they may pop out.
What a bunch of pseudohistorical retarded fedora drivel. Are you high on Draper and Dixon farts?
https://www.catholiceducation.org/en/controversy/galileo/debunking-the-galileo-myth.html
https://historyforatheists.com/the-great-myths/
Yea, I feel the same way when it comes to that bullshit. Like when people link to biased, agenda-driven, propagandist sources like the Catholic Education Resource Center, or when they link to a christian apologist posing as an atheist trying to set the record straight on "Great (atheist) Myths". You'd have to be King of the Retards to think an atheist would waste his precious time on Earth defending Christianity from Atheism.
Historyforatheists.com is run by an atheist Tim O'Neill (see, for example https://blog.feedspot.com/atheist_blogs/, no. 29)
But Jimmious , he states his sources and quotes them abundantly, in his long and elaborate articles, so you can indeed check them. As far as who he is, and his historical expertise goes, it's all there: https://historyforatheists.com/about-the-author-and-a-faq/.