Kotaku comes to Mozg's aid: http://kotaku.com/why-some-people-have-accused-bethesda-of-ripping-off-a-1783735999
Kotaku comes to Mozg's aid: http://kotaku.com/why-some-people-have-accused-bethesda-of-ripping-off-a-1783735999
Yeah and Terminator wasn't an exact rip off of Soldier, but Harlan Ellison still got his credit.
Of course Hernandez is a known unethical shill.
Props to the mod author for taking the right steps in dealing with this whole affair. It baffles me though, that people tried to defend this piece of shit by keep mentioning the EULA. Are ideas and writings now part of the GECK?
Well, it's one thing to point out that, it's another to say how the content of the mod which is obviously not part of the GECK as something that Bethesda own, as if those are part of the GECK. I understood it still takes place in Fallout universe, but seriously the mod author could've realized the mod's idea as a whole new game instead or even made it a mod for another game.Props to the mod author for taking the right steps in dealing with this whole affair. It baffles me though, that people tried to defend this piece of shit by keep mentioning the EULA. Are ideas and writings now part of the GECK?
Unless you're pathologically lawful neutral, it's not defending Bethesda to point out that legal remedies are lacking. Bethesda is shitty, IP laws are shitty, EULAs are shitty, but they still add up to zero chance of getting any meaningful compensation in a lawsuit.
No, I just feel like it's kinda hard for Bethesda to steal a 6 hour quest mod and turn it into a generic film noir murder mystery.
EDIT: Above all though, if you're gonna call me dumb, at least tell me why I'm wrong.
I played through Brain Dead last night, and have spent a couple of hours watching Let’s Plays of Autumn Leaves as well.
That's what I've been saying. And it's just shows how shady and creatively bankrupt Bethesda is. Yeah, as the bigger picture, the constant, murder mystery solving was nothing new. But the major details, the variables, like the importance of voice module, sexy moment with robot, and painting discussion, were the exact same? That still count as plagiarism.That being said, if they stole anything, it'd be an idea, a concept. Copyright--to my knowledge--does not cover ideas, where it is blurry is in that copyright does cover the form in which they are expressed. However, keep in mind the mod also does borrow from the Fallout IP in terms of its use of Bethesda's assets, and several well-known concepts that are part of the franchise. So, all in all, who fucking knows.
I don't think he means to say that the end credit exists. He's saying that's what they should add, in reference to the post he's replying to.Apparently, a redditor claims that I effectively have been credited in Far Harbor's credits : https://m.reddit.com/r/pcmasterrace..._steals_a_fallout_new_vegas_mod_named/d5cv5yo
Any chance that someone here would be interested in checking that? I don't have Far Harbor and as a matter of fact, I don't even have Fallout 4. I searched for a while, but didn't found anything clonclusive yet. (Are there any credits in Far Harbor at all?)
It's like saying that orange juice borrows assets from orange trees.
Good news, though -- you've been named lead writer of Fallout 5.Woops. Thanks :'D Silly french man cannot into English.
Fallout 4 Far Harbor DLC contains quest stolen from Codexer-developed New Vegas mod