Official Codex Discord Server

  1. Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.
    Dismiss Notice

Fixed HP vs HP Increases every level

Discussion in 'Van Buren: A Fallout Adventure' started by The Brazilian Slaughter, Jan 15, 2014.

?

Fixed HP or Increasing HP?

  1. Fixed HP

    15 vote(s)
    38.5%
  2. Increasing HP

    5 vote(s)
    12.8%
  3. Slowly Increasing HP

    18 vote(s)
    46.2%
  4. Something else

    1 vote(s)
    2.6%
  1. The Brazilian Slaughter Arcane

    The Brazilian Slaughter
    Joined:
    May 11, 2007
    Messages:
    1,872,112
    Location:
    Belém do Pará
    So me, Hexer and one of his tester have been talking about fixed HP. Jim implemented fixed hp in his mod for Fallout 2, something which has been often discussed in the community.
    I think Fixed HP is teh awesome, makes endurance a valuable state and prevents Player Character power-creep to the point of absurd.
    Hexer's tester (register already man!) thinks that Fixed HP prevents player progression and can lead to a obssession with gear and drugs to compensate
    Hexer himself thinks a mid-way might be best, where HP increases but slowly.

    I decided to ask the people what they thought about so we could totally disregard their opinions as the dumb peasant grunts they are fuck democracy man see some opinions by monocled codexers.

    Does Fixed HP deviate much from the original Fallout gameplay or is it a welcome change?

    For the record, this is the HP formula in Fallout 1/2:
    Code:
    
    15 + 2 * EN + ST
    Every time you gain a level this increases by 2 + EN / 2
    
     
    ^ Top  
  2. Jaesun Fabulous Moderator

    Jaesun
    Joined:
    May 14, 2004
    Messages:
    36,924
    Location:
    Seattle, WA USA
    Torment: Tides of Numenera Divinity: Original Sin 2 BattleTech
    Why does it need to be changed?
     
    ^ Top  
  3. The Brazilian Slaughter Arcane

    The Brazilian Slaughter
    Joined:
    May 11, 2007
    Messages:
    1,872,112
    Location:
    Belém do Pará
    My reasons are that:
    1. Increasing HP makes Endurance a useless stat. Go read the Per Joner's Ultimate Fallout Walkthroughs, his comment on endurance is pretty much "LOL who cares get Lifegiver", and he's right, two levels of lifegiver >>> lots of endurance points. The only people who put more than 4 on endurance are first-time players, and some of the people who play Fallout 2 in Ironman mode. By level 6 or 8 you already got more HP than Sulik, and by the end-game

    2. Power creep eventually makes event the 4 EN player into a 200-hp indestructible man who by the end-game can tank high-caliber rifle shots without armor and survive, not to mention surpass Super Mutants in HP, which is ridiculous because they're superhuman and you're not. Van Buren is a lot less linear than FO2, so it might also be ridiculous to see tribal villages where everyone has 50 HP at max then go to the Brotherhood or somesuch and everyone has 100 HP there.

    3. Less emphasis on HP bloat, more emphasis on Armor/Evasion (once AC)/drugs.
     
    • Brofist Brofist x 1
    ^ Top  
  4. sea inXile Entertainment Developer

    sea
    Joined:
    May 3, 2011
    Messages:
    5,698
    If I was making an RPG today I would go with fixed HP with no increase, and get the same effect through evasion, damage resistance/threshold, etc. HP increases over the course of the game often allow the player to make more mistakes as the game goes on, not fewer. An RPG with reasonably tactical combat should focus on horizontal growth by offering new options to damage or resist enemies with unique protections and attack types. Doesn't mean you can't do HP growth on level-up, but I feel like it'd be easier to manage if you just got rid of it outright.

    Specifically for Fallout/2, I think fixed HP works provided you balance the weapons and armour a bit. The game's combat doesn't have many good ways to avoid taking damage and it would get too lethal later on to survive, say, the Mariposa assault, even with Power Armor.
     
    Last edited: Jan 15, 2014
    • Brofist Brofist x 4
    ^ Top  
  5. hexer Guest

    hexer
    I've voted for slowly increasing HP. I understand the logic behind fixed HP but I'm also thinking about what people expect from a classic Fallout game.

    Jim the Dinosaur could tell us what was the feedback for his fixed HP.
     
    ^ Top  
  6. laclongquan Arcane

    laclongquan
    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2007
    Messages:
    1,868,127
    Location:
    Searching for my kidnapped sister
    About Fallout system specifically.

    If I remember correctly, Endurance related to chance to get addicted, in both F2 and FNV. Low endurance mean you are a junkie with disminishing returns from the semi-scarce chems.

    You can get over that by using lots of rest, but that smell of really big meta. You can use two perks for lifegivers, or drug-related status, but I can think of a lot of better use for perks than them, both in F2 and in FNV.

    So yeah, in term of gameplay, Endurancedump is too big a powerplaying meta tactics that I see no need to be nerfed. For normal players and most powergamers, you just dont care that much to risk low endurance. playing that build is a chore, basically.

    A counterpoint toward fixed HP is that the game must, by design, give you more lethal hardware over the time. so it mean you can get killed by one shot at late game, no difference than dying by one shot at early game.

    you will get so many criticisms about fixed HP over this aspect of gameplay you will drop your project in disgust.

    As for the complaint about tribal village and Brotherhood people, I see no problem. On the one hand you have tribal people who live on the edge of starvation. On the other hand you have Brotherhood personel who enjoy high tech tools, trade far and wide for the goods they almost monopolize. Of course there' s difference in bodies. Just look at a pictures that contain soldiers of South Korea, American, and North Korea, as I am certain there's at least one on Net. You will be struck by how the yank look twice as big/tall compared to the north korea guy. A 100kg gorilla from the US can take a 5.56mm bullet to the body and still keep going but a 60kg small guy might just stop a while.
     
    ^ Top  
  7. hexer Guest

    hexer
    Don't forget we can always have "Normal" (classic Fallout gameplay) and "Survivor" (fixed HPs, etc.) modes.
     
    ^ Top  
  8. ERYFKRAD Barbarian Patron

    ERYFKRAD
    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2012
    Messages:
    17,714
    Serpent in the Staglands Shadorwun: Hong Kong Pillars of Eternity 2: Deadfire
    Slow increases to HP seems fine. hexer, you don't think having two modes is too much work?
     
    • Brofist Brofist x 1
    ^ Top  
  9. hexer Guest

    hexer
    It depends on how those two modes would differ. It's just an idea, we will see what TBS proposes once he finishes his first draft of the gameplay system.
     
    ^ Top  
  10. Gregz Arcane

    Gregz
    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2011
    Messages:
    6,217
    Location:
    The Desert Wasteland
    HP is an abstraction for learned survivability, not growing more skill cells between the enemy and your vital organs.
     
    • Brofist Brofist x 3
    ^ Top  
  11. Surf Solar cannot into womynz

    Surf Solar
    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2011
    Messages:
    8,629
    I like when I actually see the progress in my characters stats, i.e "numbers growing". Instead of tweaking the entire system, you could just change the requirements for lifegiver perks (they are indeed overpowered) and lower the general amount of HP that you get per level up. That's atleast what I did ;)
     
    ^ Top  
  12. Monstergelo Barely Literate

    Monstergelo
    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2014
    Messages:
    4
    How about making the default HP 200 or something, and then for each level you got 5 more or something
     
    ^ Top  
  13. Jim the Dinosaur Arcane

    Jim the Dinosaur
    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2009
    Messages:
    3,064
    Feedback wasn't much different from the tone of the discussion right now.

    Main reason I did it was FO2-specific, namely that increasing HP completely throws off the existing armor system (I always use the example of a magnum doing the same amount of damage against one of Metzger's goons as a turbo plasma rifle against an Enclave Trooper; the Enclave Trooper (and you, at that point) just has something like 4 times the HP, so combat'd take that amount more time if it weren't for those blessings in disguise, eye crits - or hugely increased rates of fire).

    Second reason was that,

    which is why it's more suited for a class-based (or combat-focused) game. Because your talky pacifistic character is increasing in combat survivability just as rapidly as a guy racking up hundreds of kills the abstraction falls apart pretty fast (e.g. in a class-based system like D&D they partially solve this by lowering the HP for classes you wouldn't expect to have much in way of combat survivability, like spellcasters). You're just better off treating HP as health (and therefor fixed, or perhaps even declining in the radioactive wasteland) and handling combat survivability through combat skills (just as you'd handle non-combat survivability through skills such as outdoorsman).
     
    Last edited: Jan 15, 2014
    • Brofist Brofist x 3
    ^ Top  
  14. Raghar Arcane

    Raghar
    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2009
    Messages:
    11,800
    Are you aware that the above formula is the very definition of a limited HP increase?

    The first few terms are to differentiate between born in HP, the second part is for that few HP gained by radiation on wasteland during level up.
     
    ^ Top  
  15. hexer Guest

    hexer
    We were talking about slowing it down even more on level ups.

    Maybe EN + STR / 4 (round down) or 2 + EN / 3 (round down)
     
    ^ Top  
  16. Raghar Arcane

    Raghar
    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2009
    Messages:
    11,800
    10 + 10/4 and 2 + 10/3?
    12 per level and 5 per level. Previous was 7 per level. Also I think the STR bonus was supposed to be onetime deal to differentiate between certain types of characters. These characters with bit higher END should eclipse characters with poor END and high STR, the high STR is just making the low END not so atrociously bad.
     
    ^ Top  
  17. hexer Guest

    hexer
    Sorry, that's (EN + STR) / 4 (round down) or (2 + EN) / 3 (round down)

    So it's 5 per level and 4 per level in your examples.

    I won't mind if Strength starts playing some role in your character's health at each level.

    I have a personal story to share: I'm an amateur powerlifter and have some strength. I fell from a horse and got up. I was thrown about from 7ft into air and then fell onto very hard soil. A skinnier lad fell in the same place and in almost the same fashion (it was the same problematic horse) but he ended up in hospital because he broke a bone. I can't claim 100% that this was due to more/less muscle mass but that certainly did have an effect.
     
    ^ Top  
  18. hiver Guest

    hiver
    The people should expect some things to be upgraded in natural, appropriate ways.

    Fixed HP is a great thing to have, since it directly increses the importance of several mechanics and equipment - AND any medical skill - which were all negatively affected by the original take on the matter - which followed the Easy path of just "making things easy for the theoretical masses" - instead of making the best game it can be.

    But that can be excused since it was one of the first games like this and The Team worked for a business company that needs to get profits.

    You dont.

    Leave HP increase for an Easy mod.
     
    ^ Top  
  19. Norfleet Moderator

    Norfleet
    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2005
    Messages:
    9,185
    So, exactly like real life, then? Winners don't use drugs my ass.
     
    ^ Top  
  20. DraQ Prestigious Gentleman Arcane

    DraQ
    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2007
    Messages:
    32,029
    Location:
    Chrząszczyżewoszyce, powiat Łękołody
    Why is this even a question?

    Also, abstraction clash - on one hand DR/DT per damage type to simulate attacks failing to penetrate altogether, on the other "ololol survivability". My ass.
     
    • Brofist Brofist x 1
    ^ Top  
  21. laclongquan Arcane

    laclongquan
    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2007
    Messages:
    1,868,127
    Location:
    Searching for my kidnapped sister
    In Fallout 2 and Fallout New Vegas I do play junkie. Especially FNV. JUnkie is a powerplay strategy. You can compensate for its shortcomings with perks and builds.

    ANyway, back to HP fixed or levelup.

    The only way I can see HP fixed become viable is that a lot of resistance perks for late game. Then manually add that to late game enemies. And lots of tough armor for late game, with very strict control when it become avaible. Ditto with AP ammo guns

    On the other hand, I cant think that I am the only one to figure out that. So it must have some reason that nobody ever apply fixed HP in combat games.
     
    ^ Top  
  22. Ulminati Kamelåså! Patron

    Self-Ejected
    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2010
    Messages:
    20,233
    Location:
    DiNMRK
    I voted slowly increasing HP. But like sea, I would actually prefer the additional survivability players gain by level would be in the form of damage resistances, evasion and the like. If HP is the only measurement of survivability the system has, I would prefer if a high level character had no more than, say, ~+50% HP compared to a starting character.

    On the topic of HP, I also wish more systems had pain penalties. IE: When your hp drops below certain tresholds, you get penalties to evasion, accuracy, skills and the like. It's one of my pet peeves when a character with 1HP is as effective at fighting as one at full health and it encourages focus-firing on a single opponent as the optimal solution in almost every encounter.
     
    Last edited: Oct 1, 2014
    ^ Top  
  23. DraQ Prestigious Gentleman Arcane

    DraQ
    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2007
    Messages:
    32,029
    Location:
    Chrząszczyżewoszyce, powiat Łękołody
    Actually everyone has always applied fixed HP to combat games that aren't RPGs.
    It's simply yet another stupid case of "traditional" RPG mechanics clouding everyone's mind.

    For what it's worth it's much easier to balance everything if you don't have to account for hideous HP and damage inflation, progression becomes more of a question of "how" than "how much grind" too.
     
    • Brofist Brofist x 2
    ^ Top  
  24. laclongquan Arcane

    laclongquan
    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2007
    Messages:
    1,868,127
    Location:
    Searching for my kidnapped sister
  25. Grunker RPG Codex Ghost Patron

    Grunker
    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2009
    Messages:
    21,916
    Location:
    Copenhagen
    Codex 2012 Dead State Divinity: Original Sin Torment: Tides of Numenera Pillars of Eternity 2: Deadfire
    I like GURPS' method (surprise): Fixed HP, but with the ability to "buy" limited amounts of HP through other systems like Perks.

    EDIT: Also, this:

    HP inflation is the bane of brisk and tactically focused combat. If you ride alone, you ride with HP INFLATION!
     
    Last edited: Oct 1, 2014
    • Brofist Brofist x 4
    ^ Top  

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.