Raymondo
Liturgist
Just out of curiosity don’t you call it a Game Media Site? Just asking
Now who’s not acting professional
Now who’s not acting professional
AlaShiban said:Details details.... its 2am, cut me some slack
anyways, was nice visting another website online, i must be going though, lot of work to do, enjoy your stay!
Dennis S. said:We've posted the interview as is, since no one was particularly sure where the original questions were - we post two articles a day on normal basis, and until now have found no reason to check on contents of our interview questions - but there's a first time for everything I guess.
Apparently mr. Tomas while copying and pasting his responses has accidentally copy+pasted your question as well. It has been removed from our article now. As you might've noticed it was the only identical question in our interview.
As for SIMILAR questions - I'm sorry to disappoint you, if you claim to have sent your interview questions same time as us (one month ago, after official announcement of the game) we simply couldn't have seen the questions your interviewer has written without hacking into his computer. If you suspect that's the case, consider shelling out some money for a firewall. As for identical answers, feel free to refer to mr Bencik himself, I believe you have his e-mail address.
Like I've already said we've removed the offending question from our interview, and I offer my personal apology on behalf of that even though it was mr. Bencik that, to tell you the truth like it should be told, fucked up.
- re-post PRIVATE e-mails (the e-mails were meant for the receiver, not public vieweing the way I understand it - so now who is having problems understanding ethics?)
Oh, making fun of the English skills of my Italian colleague just made you hit a 10/10 on my personal 'arrogant fuck of today' rating. Congratulations dumbass, you're the grammar Nazi of the day.
No, some of us run professional gaming websites as legitimate businesses and manage to become a part of UGO network. They also manage to make it into the top 7,000 most visited sites on the Internet with a daily average of 100,000 uniques. Now what have you done, dumbass?
I didn't know we were talking to Infogrames' PR manager... And if I knew that I'd tell you the same thing we told them before ? if you're dumb enough to put 'preview' trailers on public, anonymous FTPs belonging to the company, you can expect someone downloading them and posting on sites. And is it any of YOUR business once again? You leeched it off of our free bandwidth, and now you're accusing us of something? Good job once again, dumbass.
For now I'm not yet ready to go down to your level and frankly I've got some PAID work to do for the site now.
However feel free not to remove your idiotic bullshit from here and frontpage, and feel free to keep flaming me, Francesco and Gamer's Hell in general for whatever bullshit reason you might have now. I might check back in a bit and have a laugh. Free entertainment is always good.
Deenis S. said:Apparently Mr Tomas while copying and pasting his responses has accidentally copy+pasted your question as well. It has been removed from our article now.
EEVIAC said:It was posted at Gamer's Hell, the interviewer should have checked it and at least figured out for himself that one of the questions was out of place. Think of it another way, if Tomas had inadvertantly included DOOM 3 information that only he was privy to, the interviewer/editor of the piece would still be responsible, (except he would be in a lot more trouble.) Whether you misappropriate from a small company (RPGCodex) or a large one (iD) the principle of theft is essentially the same. Anyways, its now fixed, which is good for everyone..
because they get paid to do what they
Saint_Proverbius said:Dennis S. said:We've posted the interview as is, since no one was particularly sure where the original questions were - we post two articles a day on normal basis, and until now have found no reason to check on contents of our interview questions - but there's a first time for everything I guess.
See, this is why I CC interview questions to at least one other staff member here, so in the event I'm not around to post the interview, they can check it for consistancy. In fact, had your editor, which is what an editor is supposed to do, checked your interviews for things like this, then the offending thing in the first place would have never been tossed up on your site. Your editor would have seen that a question that wasn't from your interview was in the interview, and he could have cut it out right then or at least enquired to the interviewee where the question came from.
It's a several step process, I'm talking about here. When you're taking the draft of that interview and adding the HTML to it for submission, then a novel idea is proof reading it to make sure everything's honkey-dorey.
Then again, my interview was also posted a day prior to yours.
Like I pointed out, he may have made the original blunder, if that's true. However, your editor should have checked the interview before posting it, especially considering he took the time to the question. Offering an apology without accepting at least part of the fault here, which is clearly the case, was part of the problem.
Sure thing, would you like me to remove it and replace it with the fact you post anything you get back from a developer without any sort of content checking whatsoever? How your big, professional business site, which gets 100,000 impressions per day has no system in place to make sure something doesn't slip in to their two pieces of content they post a day, even though they seem to have gobs and gobs of PAID staff members that are supposed to do that sort of thing? Isn't that what an editor does? Edit things to make sure they're how they're supposed to be?
Thanks a lot for the inside knowledge on how to run a big gaming news site. It'
Raymondo2000 said:because they get paid to do what they
lol yeah right, I don't even think all 3 of their banners cover enough for their website let alone actually getting paid for sitting on their asses all-day.
Dennis S. said:Raymondo2000 said:because they get paid to do what they
lol yeah right, I don't even think all 3 of their banners cover enough for their website let alone actually getting paid for sitting on their asses all-day.
Uh-oh... Now we're also criticized for having three banners instead of four pop-ups in a row like this site has... Ok, we'll listen to your suggestion of course... Would 4 pop-ups suffice or should we put 4+ to make our site more attractive than this one?
Dennis S. said:So when you get the interviews back, you check original questions vs. the questions you have in the document you've received? Every single one to make sure the developer didn't copy+paste some additional questions from some other interview? Well, in that case it'd explain RPGCodex' rank on Alexa...
EEVIAC said:Dennis S. said:So when you get the interviews back, you check original questions vs. the questions you have in the document you've received? Every single one to make sure the developer didn't copy+paste some additional questions from some other interview? Well, in that case it'd explain RPGCodex' rank on Alexa...
What are you getting paid for? You're complaining about the duties of your job? The fact that 100 000 unique hits a day expect you to be right should put a little spring in your step. Wouldn't you rather be right than popular? Wouldn't you rather be both?
We <3 j00 2, David! PLZ SPEND MOER TIME RITING ESCUSES 4 J00R D3SIGNZ 4 US. KTHXBYE!
Omegaslast said:Oh and whats this about being anal retentive about "u"? I guess this is your idea of perfect english?
Quote from RPGcodex front page:
We <3 j00 2, David! PLZ SPEND MOER TIME RITING ESCUSES 4 J00R D3SIGNZ 4 US. KTHXBYE!
Spazmo said:The identical questions are highly suspect and I'd like to know what spellchecker let a mistake like "u" instead of the proper "you" into your content. I'm not criticising anyone who doesn't speak English as a first language here (despite the fact that our Polish staff member write flawless English), I'm just saying it's not professional..
It looks like GamersHell has decided that rather than write interviews on their own, they've decided to cut and paste interviews from other sites and call it theirs.
Spazmo said:Assuming everything the GH editors have been saying is true, Mayhem is to blame for this mess.
Dennis S. said:Posting bullshit on your frontpage instead of E-MAILING US like NORMAL PEOPLE DO was yet another part of the problem.
Psilon said:Dennis S. said:Posting bullshit on your frontpage instead of E-MAILING US like NORMAL PEOPLE DO was yet another part of the problem.
Go way back to the start of the thread, there. Saint quoted the email he sent you guys..
Dennis S. said:Psilon said:Dennis S. said:Posting bullshit on your frontpage instead of E-MAILING US like NORMAL PEOPLE DO was yet another part of the problem.
Go way back to the start of the thread, there. Saint quoted the email he sent you guys..
So sending an e-mail, followed by a hateful news/forum post without waiting for resolution of the problem or even a simple REPLY to it (the e-mail) is OK? Riiiiight.
I thought you were done here? Plz let this thread die.Dennis Teh Menace! said:Really, I am done here, I don't have any points left to prove.
Dennis S. said:o be honest this is the first time I've heard of RPGCodex. We REALLY don't have the time to visit every gaming news site on the internet and check every article for 'identical' questions. I doubt you do that either. As for professionalism... And I quote from your website's frontpage
It looks like GamersHell has decided that rather than write interviews on their own, they've decided to cut and paste interviews from other sites and call it theirs.
Perfect English, right? I'd suggest to stop being so anal about 'u's in our articles, or at least check the quality of your news beforehand.
XJEDX said:I had never heard of this "Alexa" thing, so I looked it up. I searched for our site, and here is the "stats":
RPG Codex - putting the 'role' back in RPG
Avg.User Review: 1 out of 5 stars
Amusing how some people continually confuse quanity for quality. Also funny how some people think that a hobby-enthusiast is somehow a lower lifeform than a hack. I'm glad no one is P41D! to do this site, that's why its bullshit-to-information ratio is so good.