First of all, game list this year was shit. We worked with what we had. Additionally, we could only rate the games that we actually played. There were several that we wanted to check out but were never mentioned in the discussion, either because we didn't like them or because not enough people could comment (such as Game of Thrones). Fact is that yeah, we could replace X or Y - but with what? Risen 2? Game of Thrones? The amount of good titles this year was very slim and if we picked one instead we'd just get complaints that we should have picked another mediocre RPG instead.
I recognize that there's a shitty list of games to choose from, but first of all, yes, Game of Thrones has infinitely better writing than that fucking crap you listed, and secondly,
if you recognize that the year was shit for RPGs, say that instead of crowning what you yourselves, according to your own words, consider shit.
Your sin, mr. Schwarz, isn't that you had no games to work with - it's not your fault that this year was crap - but that you actually make a site-piece to glorify that bullshit instead of saying it like it is: 2012 was perhaps the worst year for cRPGs in history - in the very least, it was a terrible one. "Hello, fellow Banshees, we think 2012 was crap, Kickstarter looks promising, these games are perhaps worthy of mention, but that's it." You do not do "game journalism" any favors by scraping shit of the floor and crowning the best of the worst of it. Especially when you don't even write that that's what your doing. Excuse me very much,
but your "game list this year was shit" rings very hollow when your Games of 2012 piece does nothing but praise the games in it. Hell, you fucking praise Darksiders II -
an RPG on your RPG Awards list - for having "more RPG elements" than its predecessor. Isn't it self-evident that when you have to praise a game that wins an RPG-award for actually having a couple of RPG-elements in it, something is fucking wrong?
Take note as well that I'm not your usual Skyway-everything-is-crap-Codexer. I have plenty of tolerance for mainstream games and most of the RPGs some of the "angry" Codexers hate. But your list is pretty much all completely generally agreed upon awful games here at the Codex, no matter which type of poster you are, so of course we're calling you out for glorifying them. If you like those games, fine, but then don't come here defending GameBanshee by saying you had a crap selection. Own up to the fact that you like these games and consider them good RPGs. If you don't, don't write the piece, or write it differently.
Also note that most here actually didn't expect this of you. People here are harsh on you because you're
not Kotaku. People are surprised that your piece is so terrible.
People expected better of you. Some of you wrote very excellent pieces on the topic of game journalism integrity, and then you produce this? Come on, man.
In essence, the contents of my post was already summed up in one line by Zed:
I understand why DU refuse to do a write-up for 2012. Both GB and RPGWatch grasping at straws to crown "winners".