Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

God DAMN Divinity II is addictive

Roguey

Codex Staff
Staff Member
Sawyerite
Joined
May 29, 2010
Messages
36,888
I'm fully aware a lot of people enjoy bad games. :)
 

Roguey

Codex Staff
Staff Member
Sawyerite
Joined
May 29, 2010
Messages
36,888
I'm fully aware a lot of people enjoy bad games. :)

It's also (and I know this is unbelievable) possible that maybe it's a good game that you just don't like.
But I did think it was decent enough as a timesink. It's a genre that can be done well, but Larian made specific choices that hurt playability. Though on the upside, the final product is a lot better than the three previous iterations they wanted to make.
 

toro

Arcane
Vatnik
Joined
Apr 14, 2009
Messages
14,932
Zeriel: Stop :deadhorse:

It's a shitty game and not even a decent timesink.
 

ohWOW

Sucking on dicks and being proud of it
Dumbfuck Queued
Joined
Nov 15, 2011
Messages
2,449
So, I got this game.
It's shit, single player mmo, but much shittier than anything. Even Kingdoms of Amalur is better, because has better fighting animations. Is it as shit as broken valley all game, or it's just not worth any more time?

Fuck this, they even fucked up the "i wanna be a dragon" aspect, turning dragon into a levitating ship fighting creeps with fire and with one of the shittiest animations, like ever.
 

ohWOW

Sucking on dicks and being proud of it
Dumbfuck Queued
Joined
Nov 15, 2011
Messages
2,449
Are you implying that Divinity 2's "we're missing 90% of frames!" animations are better than at least smooth KoA animations?

KoA is utter shit too.
 

ohWOW

Sucking on dicks and being proud of it
Dumbfuck Queued
Joined
Nov 15, 2011
Messages
2,449
Go play you precious Skyrim and suck tasty Bethesda's cocks.

And you blame me for having shitty criteria.
 

Roguey

Codex Staff
Staff Member
Sawyerite
Joined
May 29, 2010
Messages
36,888
So, I got this game.
It's shit, single player mmo, but much shittier than anything. Even Kingdoms of Amalur is better, because has better fighting animations. Is it as shit as broken valley all game, or it's just not worth any more time?

Fuck this, they even fucked up the "i wanna be a dragon" aspect, turning dragon into a levitating ship fighting creeps with fire and with one of the shittiest animations, like ever.
That's Gamebryo's animation tools for you.

Larian considers Broken Valley the highpoint of Div2 so forget about it. Shit game Eurotrash-loving hipsters love to gush about, decent timesink for me only because of my low standards.
 

roll-a-die

Magister
Joined
Sep 27, 2009
Messages
3,131
So, I got this game.
It's shit, single player mmo, but much shittier than anything. Even Kingdoms of Amalur is better, because has better fighting animations. Is it as shit as broken valley all game, or it's just not worth any more time?

Fuck this, they even fucked up the "i wanna be a dragon" aspect, turning dragon into a levitating ship fighting creeps with fire and with one of the shittiest animations, like ever.
That's Gamebryo's animation tools for you.

Larian considers Broken Valley the highpoint of Div2 so forget about it. Shit game Eurotrash-loving hipsters love to gush about, decent timesink for me only because of my low standards.
Actually Gamebryo isn't used for animation, just a semi-competent renderer and easily moldable base for middleware. Most companies use middleware tools for animation not gamebryo itself. The shitty animations lie solely on the artists not on the engine.
 

Roguey

Codex Staff
Staff Member
Sawyerite
Joined
May 29, 2010
Messages
36,888
Actually Gamebryo isn't used for animation, just a semi-competent renderer and easily moldable base for middleware. Most companies use middleware tools for animation not gamebryo itself. The shitty animations lie solely on the artists not on the engine.
If they had used middleware for animation, it would have been listed. Josh Sawyer said there's no easy way to blend in NV and that a lot of animations have to be made from scratch because of this (which requires more time/money than it's worth/they've been given). No one except the player character in Div2 (and no one at all in Bethbryo games) has a diagonal walk/run because of this issue.

Furthermore
http://www.gamebryo.com/features.php
Animation blending, layering and transitions can be adjusted in Gamebryo’s powerful Animation tool.
"Powerful" :lol: What false advertising.
 

roll-a-die

Magister
Joined
Sep 27, 2009
Messages
3,131
Actually Gamebryo isn't used for animation, just a semi-competent renderer and easily moldable base for middleware. Most companies use middleware tools for animation not gamebryo itself. The shitty animations lie solely on the artists not on the engine.
If they had used middleware for animation, it would have been listed. Josh Sawyer said there's no easy way to blend in NV and that a lot of animations have to be made from scratch because of this (which requires more time/money than it's worth/they've been given). No one except the player character in Div2 (and no one at all in Bethbryo games) has a diagonal walk/run because of this issue.

Furthermore
http://www.gamebryo.com/features.php
Animation blending, layering and transitions can be adjusted in Gamebryo’s powerful Animation tool.
"Powerful" :lol: What false advertising.
Ah, you're making the common mistake and assuming it's for creation, that's an import tool, as well as a tool for syncing animations within the engine to inputs. Generally what I'm talking about is content creation middleware, they don't have to list every tool they use in a project. Generally it's an Autodesk Animation Suite because those are industry standard. That's what creates the animations, the gamebryo animation tool is what imports them for use in the renderer.

It's not powerful, because it relies on the other tools and the users being competent. Gamebryo is incredibly barebones, and is generally only used because licensing it is cheap, and they have premade bindings for most common middleware.

Source: When I was attempting at one point to make a game, I bought a license to gamebryo 3 thinking I could recreate/make a game like Morrowind with it. Unless a lot changed with version 4, which I doubt, it's a massive pain to work with.
 

Roguey

Codex Staff
Staff Member
Sawyerite
Joined
May 29, 2010
Messages
36,888
Ah, you're making the common mistake and assuming it's for creation, that's an import tool, as well as a tool for syncing animations within the engine to inputs. Generally what I'm talking about is content creation middleware, they don't have to list every tool they use in a project. Generally it's an Autodesk Animation Suite because those are industry standard. That's what creates the animations, the gamebryo animation tool is what imports them for use in the renderer.

It's not powerful, because it relies on the other tools and the users being competent. Gamebryo is incredibly barebones, and is generally only used because licensing it is cheap, and they have premade bindings for most common middleware.

Source: When I was attempting at one point to make a game, I bought a license to gamebryo 3 thinking I could recreate/make a game like Morrowind with it. Unless a lot changed with version 4, which I doubt, it's a massive pain to work with.
However, Josh said that the problem lies with the way the engine handles blending which is a Gamebryo-side problem. Additionally the Divinity Anthology comes with videos of behind-the-scenes stuff and I remember a moment where they show a pig rolling around with far more fluidity and detail than pigs do in the game itself, so something happened between "bullshit example for investors" and "finished product."
 

roll-a-die

Magister
Joined
Sep 27, 2009
Messages
3,131
Ah, you're making the common mistake and assuming it's for creation, that's an import tool, as well as a tool for syncing animations within the engine to inputs. Generally what I'm talking about is content creation middleware, they don't have to list every tool they use in a project. Generally it's an Autodesk Animation Suite because those are industry standard. That's what creates the animations, the gamebryo animation tool is what imports them for use in the renderer.

It's not powerful, because it relies on the other tools and the users being competent. Gamebryo is incredibly barebones, and is generally only used because licensing it is cheap, and they have premade bindings for most common middleware.

Source: When I was attempting at one point to make a game, I bought a license to gamebryo 3 thinking I could recreate/make a game like Morrowind with it. Unless a lot changed with version 4, which I doubt, it's a massive pain to work with.
However, Josh said that the problem lies with the way the engine handles blending which is a Gamebryo-side problem. Additionally the Divinity Anthology comes with videos of behind-the-scenes stuff and I remember a moment where they show a pig rolling around with far more fluidity and detail than pigs do in the game itself, so something happened between "bullshit example for investors" and "finished product."
I'm not quite sure how to say this, but, as it requires a fair bit of knowledge of animation to understand, ask me to clarify if you get confused. As it is I'll try to explain concepts as they come up. And to keep it fairly basic.

Animation, as in the movement of 3D objects through space is hard to do dynamically in a self updating process. The standard style of animation, used by pretty much everyone in the industry is keyframe, even if you have Mocap it's usually converted by hand to keyframe. The holy grail, of late, animation wise is procedural animation, like the kind the folks at havok, autodesk and lucas arts have come up with independently. Each of these use physics schema to examine how an actual limb would constrain to the motion, and then attempts to animate it. Still in these systems, because they can't realisticly model things like a walk cycle using physics, they hand animate, or convert mocap. Any animation at all is done on the CPU, and yes it's generally done on the CPU not the GPU. Unless you have the good grace to have a PPU or an Nvidia SLI array with a card dedicated to physX. Then generally those packages above will work with that. But only if they are utilized. So when you see initial product offerings with smooth animations, and such, and then discover, in the actual game the animation is far worse, this is due to the realization that the hardware likely can't handle it. Oblivion, Div2, and the recent fallouts were all designed using traditional non-physics based keyframe animation. Which requires something called transition frames. Transition frames are not something done automatically, they are generally done semiautomatically then tweaked, in most modern SDKs, in gamebryo 3, the automatic generation is nearly borked and only works half the time, and it's suggested to do manual, however, doing a purely manual generation of transition frames is mindbogglingly hard, time consuming and relies on a lot of skill and patience to avoid a phenomenon called "Jumping" if I remember right, where there are gaps in between an animation and the next. I know for a fact that until Skyrim(Allegedly), Bethesda as a publisher, and by extension Obsidian as a developer, were using version 3, not version 4, which wasn't stable at the time of those games creation(It was only released in July last year.). I honestly believe this is why Bethesda has hard coded most of the animations in the game. Theres no real automatic generation of transition frames, so you end up with a jump at the end of the animation as it goes back into a basic standing or another basic frame(Look at oblivion animation mods). The other thing to note, is that the production standard for animation frames is between 14-24 frames per second depending on the style of the game and the studio in question. Skyrim mostly solves the transition problem, by implementing the Havok Animation Suite, or possibly Autodesks Solution, I can't recall. This means animation replacement is much smoother, and all the transition frames can be generated from real life physical constraints on the body, procedurally with only a cursory look over and tweak. If they set up their editor correctly, I don't own Skyrim PC edition at current, so I can't really tell if I am assuming too much.
 

ohWOW

Sucking on dicks and being proud of it
Dumbfuck Queued
Joined
Nov 15, 2011
Messages
2,449
All of this doesn't change the fact that Divinity 2 is fucking ugly and animations are literally hurting your eyes.
 

Commissar Draco

Codexia Comrade Colonel Commissar
Patron
Joined
Mar 6, 2011
Messages
20,885
Location
Привислинский край
Insert Title Here Strap Yourselves In Divinity: Original Sin Project: Eternity Torment: Tides of Numenera Wasteland 2 Divinity: Original Sin 2
Champion armor looks great and doesn't have any spikes, as the game goes it is fast paced, has good quests with some C&C and decent writing a modest :incline:
DD was much better but it might be my nostalgy for ISO 2D games speaking.
 

ohWOW

Sucking on dicks and being proud of it
Dumbfuck Queued
Joined
Nov 15, 2011
Messages
2,449
no spikes
Divinity2.jpg
 

ohWOW

Sucking on dicks and being proud of it
Dumbfuck Queued
Joined
Nov 15, 2011
Messages
2,449
I didn't play this shit beyond Broken Shitlley. Don't care about this shit anyway.
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom