MjKorz
Educated
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2022
- Messages
- 207
They're Mary Sues, because going against them is wrong by definition since killing them results in an inevitable end of the world. They are literally always in the right by definition and if you think they're in the wrong, you're just not "wise" enough. Like I said: if they weren't Mary Sues, there would've been an alternative solution to stopping the world ending threat. If you kill them, the game just gives you a giant fuck you and laughs in your face since you dared to go against the setting's Mary Sues.That doesn't make them Mary Sues. They are simply the central element of the setting.The setting literally can't function without them.
Umm... no? Point is characters didn't even know there was a different threat to be stopped and that setting contains only dragons as creatures of comparable power doesn't make them any kind of Mary Sue. They have diverse personalities and indeed, the setting very readily depicts them as ruthless, greedy and power-hungry. Not exactly a fit for the definition of lacking any meaningful character flaws.If Shadowrun dragons weren't Mary Sues, there'd be an alternative solution to saving the world while dragons go extinct, but there isn't.
Yeah, no. They do not affect how the story resolves in any way, all they offer is their banter, that's like saying having to choose 3 out of 5 possible companions is choices and consequences.Hong Kong party members surviving and participating in the post-game campaign are a consequence of your previous actions in and of itself.
And the characters in Hong Kong post-game campaign do provide mechanical changes to certain encounters, the consequences of their survival are not purely cosmetic.
![y1dt02.jpg](https://files.catbox.moe/y1dt02.jpg)