Zboj Lamignat
Arcane
- Joined
- Feb 15, 2012
- Messages
- 5,794
What the hell is happening in this thread? Strategy board used to be relatively free of retardation, trolls and propagators of shit taste...
Doesn't seem too promising though.We do not make any promise here since we still have to study the impact this change could imply on our side before giving a straight answer in a way or another.It is important to keep in mind that even if we are able to do changes, the line-up (creatures listing & abilities) would remain the same and we would focus on 1 or 2 creatures visuals depending on our opportunities.
Brown elves pirates master race. I wonder if any other neutrals will also be sea elves.Need a town of sea elfs.
Yeah, many creatures in IV looked just plainIMO IV's creature artstyle is awful, while the strategic map is still good looking.
I liked some of the models in HIV more than HIII, some were total shit (like the Elves). The overland map was really pretty imo, definitely on par with HIII.Yeah, many creatures in IV looked just plainIMO IV's creature artstyle is awful, while the strategic map is still good looking.
The map was OK-ish, but to this day I wonder why they dropped the perspective that was one of the most characteristic features of the great style that HoMM I-III had. When they went standard iso, Heroes became just another average strategy game presentation wise. Which was then followed by WoW-like 3D of V.
Well... they are operating within limits here. They are bound to deadlines, obviously and do not have a very strong negotiation position with whoever gives them money to begin with.Major changes are out of the question at this point if they want to hit the date they're aiming for. Goes to show you what this fan participation farce is actually worth.
It works as long as everyone is happy with everything, and this is exactly why it's completely pointless - good intentions or no good intentions. Plus, it's not transparency when the flow of information is controlled by the PR department. I highly doubt they post everything they'd want to.
That's basically what I see this as: a PR-stunt trying to get Ubisoft some cheap decent press.
I'm not a fan of overdesign in general, but one of my annoyances is how it makes shit units look better than they are supposed to. I mean look at that skeleton, its clearly someone raised a skeletons and dressed him up to look like some kinda boss unit from action game. But skeletons aren't strong, they die in thousands every game.
I'm not a fan of overdesign in general, but one of my annoyances is how it makes shit units look better than they are supposed to. I mean look at that skeleton, its clearly someone raised a skeletons and dressed him up to look like some kinda boss unit from action game. But skeletons aren't strong, they die in thousands every game. For comparison we can google out some H2/H3/H4 skeletons that look they were raised directly in battlefield and manages to pick up some generic shit sword and some armor if they were lucky.
I wonder if the devs are aware that they are making another inevitable blunder. Perhaps this is Ubisofts way of getting rid of undesireables. Assign them to make a Heroes of Migh & Magic game and then axe them when it comes out shit (it always does).