>Quake
>high IQ
I mean it's a good game but what
You Pay [for passage under bridge guarded by military] You Loose10: STALKER: Shadow of Chernobyl
...games which objectively require a high IQ in order to play...
Nier
It's always a little bit of both with AO.For a second i thought author shilling for a puzzle/programming genre games.
No sure if he trolling or just retarded...
Pretty sure you read this "fact" at something like cosmopolitanSome trivia; IQ is mental age divided by physical age and multiplied by 100. The IQ test that we do just finds out our mental age and asks for our physical age. So IQ is not a measure of intelligence, but a measure of intelligence relative to age. So you can be just as intelligent as you were 5 years ago but your IQ will be lower than what it was back then. Meaning a 20, 30, 45 and 60 year old can be equally intelligent but the 20 y/o will always have higher IQ.
TL;DR IQ is a fucking retarded metric and anyone who uses it is a bleach gargling chromosome thief who plays LoL.
Sounds like ur mad cuz u have small IQ.Some trivia; IQ is mental age divided by physical age and multiplied by 100. The IQ test that we do just finds out our mental age and asks for our physical age. So IQ is not a measure of intelligence, but a measure of intelligence relative to age. So you can be just as intelligent as you were 5 years ago but your IQ will be lower than what it was back then. Meaning a 20, 30, 45 and 60 year old can be equally intelligent but the 20 y/o will always have higher IQ.
TL;DR IQ is a fucking retarded metric and anyone who uses it is a bleach gargling chromosome thief who plays LoL.
From wikipedia : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intelligence_quotient : ''Historically, IQ is a score obtained by dividing a person’s mental age score, obtained by administering an intelligence test, by the person’s chronological age, both expressed in terms of years and months. The resulting fraction is multiplied by 100 to obtain the IQ score.'' And ofc you could do the math and find out your ''mental age'' from your IQ, which is the real measure of intelligence in the test, but then it begs the question of what having the thinking capability of a 20 or 30 or 40 year old even means.Pretty sure you read this "fact" at something like cosmopolitanSome trivia; IQ is mental age divided by physical age and multiplied by 100. The IQ test that we do just finds out our mental age and asks for our physical age. So IQ is not a measure of intelligence, but a measure of intelligence relative to age. So you can be just as intelligent as you were 5 years ago but your IQ will be lower than what it was back then. Meaning a 20, 30, 45 and 60 year old can be equally intelligent but the 20 y/o will always have higher IQ.
TL;DR IQ is a fucking retarded metric and anyone who uses it is a bleach gargling chromosome thief who plays LoL.
Then why don't you write more than tweet's worth of high IQ goodness to show show me how human intelligence can be definitively and objectively summarised in a number?This quote is so cherry picked I'm shocked you didn't omit the "historically" part, but I guess that happens when you're a low IQ sap brainlet.