Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Incline Josh Sawyer appreciation station

Kaivokz

Arcane
Joined
Feb 10, 2015
Messages
1,509
This has to be the most asinine twaddle in defense of worthless poor fag history and philosophy bachelor degrees I have ever read.
Society needs STEM degrees or apprenticeships, not worthless degrees that don't put food on the table and also put people that study this trash deeply into debt.

You're also indirectly claiming that if simpletons don't get a worthless history or philosophy major, then STEM majors will never come into contact with history or philosophy. This is incredibly absurd, especially since many STEM majors also have a minor in liberal arts. Not to mention that everyone has also had history and philosophy to some degree in grade school.

Also, a worthless history major might make you feel all fuzzy inside, but it won't support you financially. With a PhD you can at least teach (good luck finding a job, I personally know a guy with a liberal arts PhD that is unemployed), but anything less is worthless. The least of history majors will have great luck like Josh Sawyer and be able to find a non-specialist job in some industry.
You have a lot to say about money, so it might surprise you that among 4 year degree holders in the US, those who have Philosophy degrees are one of the highest earning demographics. But, that wasn’t really my point; my point is that the glorification of STEM and science and the vilification of philosophy and history (I mean all history: history of science, of quantum mechanics, of the theory of evolution, and yes of civilizations and people, etc.) is directly linked to the vacuity of the growing “intellectual” class.

I absolutely agree that taking a $100k loan to get a degree that might pay it off in 50 years is a terrible idea, regardless of the benefit the education provides—but this is true of doctors who will need 50 years to pay off their loans, and it would be true if it cost $200k to become a welder or if welders earned minimum wage; it has nothing to do with the intellectual or social benefit of the subject and all to do with the economy.

Finally, you can continue to claim that a bachelor degree in history isn't worthless, but the droves of unemployed liberal arts majors, that can only get a job at Starbucks or McDonalds, speaks a very clear language.
I guarantee you that many software developers would benefit from a few in-depth courses in logic; Aristotle with his square of opposition could teach them to be better programmers… and he’s ~2,500 years behind! A degree in history doesn’t correspond as directly with a benefit and I agree with Bester that for most people history should be supplemental to whatever their main field is. That said, I don’t think historians are useless (particularly those who go to primary sources and work more as detectives than propaganda regurgitators), but obviously if all you can do with a degree in History is work at Starbucks, then you’ve done something wrong (probably: listened to some liar talking about being whatever you want to be).

Anyway, I’m responding mostly to your hostility to the humanities when, apparently, if you stick that history major in some goggles and have them look through a microscope or other “sciency” tool, they’re valuable—even if, in practice, it takes no more critical thinking or ingenuity or talent than being a barrister. They just get paid more—and let’s be honest: do you really think Bezos and Schmuckerberg are the pinnacle of the human form? They’re the embodiment of a flourishing man?

As an aside, I have degrees in both philosophy and software development. Almost everything I learned in the latter I could have taught myself, and probably faster, but the piece of paper opens doors. From philosophy, I had a couple brilliant professors (old white men, before they all got banned) whose insight went “beyond the text” and really helped me appreciate truth, reason and argument when I was 18-19; I’m deeply indebted to them for opening my eyes to the wealth and beauty of human knowledge. Unfortunately I’m keenly aware that most good teachers are being forced out of western universities and all that’s soon to be left are propaganda mouth pieces.
 
Joined
Oct 25, 2012
Messages
232
https://gab.com/Halp/posts/109263391531807674

Josh getting dragged.


[Medicine 12/40] uhm I guess I'll take the jab, can't hurt eh...
Damn, some good shit ->

@Halp to be fair, that dude looks like he gets in underwear hammer fights already. who knows what other diseases he has swimming around

@Halp I love that the new spin is that covid gives you all the horrible adverse effects of the vaxx. And, they're eating it up. Oh my God! I had covid and now I can't breathe well, and my left arm fell off....
 

mediocrepoet

Philosoraptor in Residence
Patron
Joined
Sep 30, 2009
Messages
13,944
Location
Combatfag: Gold box / Pathfinder
Codex 2012 Codex+ Now Streaming! Enjoy the Revolution! Another revolution around the sun that is. MCA Project: Eternity Divinity: Original Sin 2
You have a lot to say about money, so it might surprise you that among 4 year degree holders in the US, those who have Philosophy degrees are one of the highest earning demographics. But, that wasn’t really my point; my point is that the glorification of STEM and science and the vilification of philosophy and history (I mean all history: history of science, of quantum mechanics, of the theory of evolution, and yes of civilizations and people, etc.) is directly linked to the vacuity of the growing “intellectual” class.

I largely agree with most of this, however, I didn't know that about earnings. I'd imagine that many of those are lawyers and such though, or who have otherwise found a compatible second education that earns while Philosophy formed the basis of their critical thought and approach to things. Is that your understanding of it?

Anyway, I’m responding mostly to your hostility to the humanities when, apparently, if you stick that history major in some goggles and have them look through a microscope or other “sciency” tool, they’re valuable—even if, in practice, it takes no more critical thinking or ingenuity or talent than being a barrister. They just get paid more—and let’s be honest: do you really think Bezos and Schmuckerberg are the pinnacle of the human form? They’re the embodiment of a flourishing man?

Zuckerberg isn't even human, Bezos looks like he's having a good time though, so if we take out virtue from the concept of being eudaimon or otherwise remove eudaimonia from what it means to be a flourishing human, sure.
:happytrollboy:

As an aside, I have degrees in both philosophy and software development. Almost everything I learned in the latter I could have taught myself, and probably faster, but the piece of paper opens doors. From philosophy, I had a couple brilliant professors (old white men, before they all got banned) whose insight went “beyond the text” and really helped me appreciate truth, reason and argument when I was 18-19; I’m deeply indebted to them for opening my eyes to the wealth and beauty of human knowledge.

I had this argument with a math PhD around 20 years ago. It's still true. A proper appreciation of the humanities requires interaction in a way that many other studies don't and it isn't the sort of thing you just pick up on your own with a book later. At least not if you want to be any good at it.
 
Joined
Feb 28, 2011
Messages
4,184
Location
Chicago, IL, Kwa
I have two undergraduate degrees, one of which is a philosophy degree. When I was applying to and interviewing with law schools I was told by multiple schools that my philosophy degree had specifically caught their attention when screening applicants because it was relatively uncommon to see applicants with anything other than pre-law, poli-sci, or criminal justice (having now conducted various law school interviews I can confirm this, although my understanding is that it's becoming less of an absolute than it was 20 years ago).

So I've never regretted my philosophy degree. Although to be fair it was from a fairly prestigious institution; I doubt it would have attracted anyone's interest if it had been conferred on me from University of Phoenix Online. Also: yeah if you're going to get a philosophy degree you should reaaaaaaaalllly consider getting a double-major.
 
Last edited:
Self-Ejected

Dadd

Self-Ejected
Joined
Aug 20, 2022
Messages
2,727
There is no degree more based than a philosophy degree.
 

santino27

Arcane
Patron
Joined
Oct 1, 2008
Messages
2,793
My team has the sexiest and deadliest waifus you can recruit.
Ready for Infinitron to split this off and send it straight to Retardo-land.
 

Major_Blackhart

Codexia Lord Sodom
Patron
Joined
Dec 5, 2002
Messages
18,433
Location
Jersey for now
It's because of all these Soyer alts that keep posting about his education is far superior to everyone else and that proves he has friends and isn't an autistic fuckwad.
 
Self-Ejected

Dadd

Self-Ejected
Joined
Aug 20, 2022
Messages
2,727
Sawyer wouldn't be able to browse this thread without having a mental breakdown.
 

A horse of course

Guest
Josh is the ONE person who should've stayed fat. Jolly Fat Sawyer was the high point of his life.
 

Kaivokz

Arcane
Joined
Feb 10, 2015
Messages
1,509
I largely agree with most of this, however, I didn't know that about earnings. I'd imagine that many of those are lawyers and such though, or who have otherwise found a compatible second education that earns while Philosophy formed the basis of their critical thought and approach to things. Is that your understanding of it?
Yes; some of them probably earn as philosophy teachers, but I would suspect most are in other fields. I don't know if it's been true in the most recent years, but historically philosophy graduates outscore most other graduates on the LSAT.

I'm not saying the degree necessarily causes them to earn more (maybe people who tend to earn more tend to be drawn to philosophy programs and the degree is tangential), but regardless they out-earn many hard sciences on average despite the memes.
phil-test-scores-salaries.png
 

Artyoan

Prophet
Joined
Jan 16, 2017
Messages
776
If Sawyer really believes the vaxx isn't the cause, his continued subscription booster plan might legit kill him. Just something to think about in the Josh Sawyer appreciation station.
 

MLMarkland

Arcane
Developer
Joined
Dec 12, 2006
Messages
1,663
Location
Malibu, CA
If Sawyer really believes the vaxx isn't the cause, his continued subscription booster plan might legit kill him. Just something to think about in the Josh Sawyer appreciation station.
Tried to warn everyone.

Went to Navajo Nation at peak “stated danger”

No danger.

Press X to continue.
 

MLMarkland

Arcane
Developer
Joined
Dec 12, 2006
Messages
1,663
Location
Malibu, CA
I largely agree with most of this, however, I didn't know that about earnings. I'd imagine that many of those are lawyers and such though, or who have otherwise found a compatible second education that earns while Philosophy formed the basis of their critical thought and approach to things. Is that your understanding of it?
Yes; some of them probably earn as philosophy teachers, but I would suspect most are in other fields. I don't know if it's been true in the most recent years, but historically philosophy graduates outscore most other graduates on the LSAT.

I'm not saying the degree necessarily causes them to earn more (maybe people who tend to earn more tend to be drawn to philosophy programs and the degree is tangential), but regardless they out-earn many hard sciences on average despite the memes.
phil-test-scores-salaries.png
Philosophy + Formal Logic = Top 1% on LSAT
 

Kaivokz

Arcane
Joined
Feb 10, 2015
Messages
1,509
That's some hot data from 2008. You got anything older for the sake of ridiculousness?
I didn’t find any more recent analyses in a quick google search (pertaining only to people with 4 year degrees), but the historical data is still useful. If we had more recent data which indicated that the average earning of a philosophy major went down while other degrees remained the same or went up over the last 14 years, then we have some reason to think it’s not studying philosophy itself that is detrimental. I suspect, if the average earnings have gone down, it would largely be due to the declining quality of philosophy programs across the board; as I said before, I am well aware that many of the most talented humanities professors are being pushed out of academia and being replaced with political stooges who will wholeheartedly repeat and affirm the diversity statements required to work at a university today.
 
Self-Ejected

Dadd

Self-Ejected
Joined
Aug 20, 2022
Messages
2,727
Philosophy programs have been corrupted by distractions that pass as political discourse. Professors volutarily genuflect before vapid ideals you are bombarded with every day everywhere without providing opportunities for discussion. The ones with integrity that are left are in their 70s and 80s, mostly teaching niche courses.
 

Blutwurstritter

Scholar
Joined
Sep 18, 2021
Messages
1,095
Location
Germany
I largely agree with most of this, however, I didn't know that about earnings. I'd imagine that many of those are lawyers and such though, or who have otherwise found a compatible second education that earns while Philosophy formed the basis of their critical thought and approach to things. Is that your understanding of it?
Yes; some of them probably earn as philosophy teachers, but I would suspect most are in other fields. I don't know if it's been true in the most recent years, but historically philosophy graduates outscore most other graduates on the LSAT.

I'm not saying the degree necessarily causes them to earn more (maybe people who tend to earn more tend to be drawn to philosophy programs and the degree is tangential), but regardless they out-earn many hard sciences on average despite the memes.
phil-test-scores-salaries.png
What exactly does "without higher degrees" mean? Are PhD's in- or excluded? I don't know the situation in the US, but in Germany you usually aim for a PhD when studying chemistry or physics. Its typically not recommended to stop at a bachelor or master in these fields since you'd have to compete with people that get vocational training in jobs that cover the same but with a focus on actual practical work instead of research.
 

I ASK INANE QUESTIONS

ITZ NEVER STOPS COOOMING
Patron
Joined
May 8, 2009
Messages
328
Steve gets a Kidney but I don't even get a tag.
cringe.PNG


Let's get back on track, we've got new material, same as the old material - Josh keeps confusing posting verbal diarrhea with shitposting.
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom