Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Josh Sawyer's Pillars of Eternity Tabletop RPG

luj1

You're all shills
Vatnik
Joined
Jan 2, 2016
Messages
13,358
Location
Eastern block
> Unbalanced
> Sawyer

Chose one.


PoE didnt end up balanced, thats the funny thing

certain races/clases are god tier compared to others
 

Roguey

Codex Staff
Staff Member
Sawyerite
Joined
May 29, 2010
Messages
35,829
PoE didnt end up balanced, thats the funny thing

certain races/clases are god tier compared to others
Sawyer stated that the goal of having no bad builds was more important than having no builds clearly superior to other builds.
 

Bester

⚰️☠️⚱️
Patron
Vatnik
Joined
Sep 28, 2014
Messages
11,122
Location
USSR
^ Typical sawyer design. Some contrived, abstract function is declared, and sawyer thinks this is ok.

The entire premise of fantasy is a return to where objects' function was tied to its appearance, a "return to simpler times". And sure, a glove can be magical. Let it do its function then. You grab smth while wearing a glove, it goes into an extradimensional space. Then you can make it appear in your hand at will. Does a glove function as a garrote? No more than a knife functions as a garrote. If you're going to strangle someone just wearing gloves, it has to be from the front. Your hands will be tied up, while the opponent can gouge our your eyes. You only strangle someone from behind arms or a cord. What he comes up with just doesn't work. It's always abstract. Not to mention, strangling from the front is reminiscent of absolutely cheap B-tier series like the original Star Trek circa 1969. It's when karate punches on the shoulder made people lose consciousness. It's ridiculous to the highest of levels.

He's the one that said "you know what, D&D was abstract. You could fall off a castle and take flat damage, then hop up and go on. So being abstract is fine". No, it's not. D&D had a few ridiculous abstractions, for which it was critiqued. That's not a reason to make your entire rpg completely abstract and detached from reality.
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom