Review KotOR first gushings at GameSpy

[Elwro]

[. Instead he weaves a rich and wonderful tale in both those campaigns that makes the OC look like a three year old wrote it.
.

Well, anyone who has more than three years should see it without anyone's help. But a good story is a necessary (not sufficient) condition for a good cRPG for me, so I guess I will like Miller's work. Anyway, thanks very much and I'll check those mods if I ever again have some free time I could devote to gaming.

 

[Seven]

Ad hominem attacks are directly proportional to one's inability to produce an argument, much less a persuasive one. Grifman

I wasn't arguing, dipshit, I was flaming the moron.

PS- Aren't you a little late? Did it take you a whole 24 hours to formulate your witty retort?

I thought you said that there were people to *debate* with in this thread. Apparently they're all left, and once again I am left with NOTHING, not even leavings or sloppy seconds.

 

[Jed]

I thought you said that there were people to *debate* with in this thread. Apparently they're all left, and once again I am left with NOTHING, not even leavings or sloppy seconds.

Honestly, Seven, jump right in. No reason you can't pile some on, too. I hate to see you keep getting left out. I'm sure we haven't seen the last of the LevelLordEbonstone or his ilk.

 

[Grifman]

Ad hominem attacks are directly proportional to one's inability to produce an argument, much less a persuasive one. Grifman

I wasn't arguing, dipshit, I was flaming the moron.

[/quote]

Duh! That's what I said dufus. Sorry if the big latin words confused you. I was pointing out that due to your inability to make an argument you were resorting to an ad hominem attack - an attack on the person - a flame, as you put it. Glad you can restate the obvious, even if you entirely miss the point!

I'm a dipshit, LOL! Thanks, you are only continuing to prove my point. You don't have an argument, apparently are incapable of framing one, so you resort to all that you are capable of - which isn't much.

PS- Aren't you a little late? Did it take you a whole 24 hours to formulate your witty retort?

Sorry, I can't act on your time schedule. But from your response, it's clear you could do with more than 24 hours for framing responses.

Grifman

 

[Spazmo]

*snip*

...and now you're flaming Jed. What's your excuse?

 

[Jed]

Duh! That's what I said dufus. Sorry if the big latin words confused you. I was pointing out that due to your inability to make an argument you were resorting to an ad hominem attack - an attack on the person - a flame, as you put it. Glad you can restate the obvious, even if you entirely miss the point! I'm a dipshit, LOL! Thanks, you are only continuing to prove my point. You don't have an argument, apparently are incapable of framing one, so you resort to all that you are capable of - which isn't much.

Fer fuck's sake; you're the one having trouble with the goddamn point here. Let me restate, slowly, what my response meant; try to follow along. I was not trying to argue with the shitbag on this occasion. There was, in fact, no argument that I was responding to. I was heckling. Do you understand this concept? This does not, however, affect my ability to argue on other occasions, the distinction being when someone is worth arguing with. In this case, he was not. It was a simple flame, do you understand?

Reading comprehension--check it out!