Esquilax
Arcane
- Joined
- Dec 7, 2010
- Messages
- 4,833
You're going at this wrong Esquilax. Every other participant is from one of the orthodox sects. Orthodox fighters fight fair, and they fight to win. They want to prove the supremacy of just their sect. Jing is under no such pressure. He can afford to fight at 80% and not use his best moves, whereas the other fighters will be admonished if they hold back.
Now this is a great argument in favour of A. Zhang himself said he doesn't care about whether we win or not, so we're free to fuck up as much as possible. This allows us a chance to study our opponent without concerning ourselves with "winning". However, the two-way flow still remains.
Also, holding back in this event will be a matter of necessity - our techniques are lethal by design, so if we start using them with bad intentions, our opponent will die.
I might be wrong, I'm not claiming to know it all. But I perceive this choice differently from you, that much is sure.
Also consider that after we our first challenge knowledge of our unique nature will spread to the other 7 sects. With each sect we face, the whole orthodox world gains knowledge of us and we gain NO additional knowledge about the next sect we face. They have channels we're not privy to. We need knowledge of 8 opponents. They need knowledge of 1. Not participating, at best, slows down this uneven flow of information to our enemies. It can't stop it. The uneven flow is more reason to participate than sit on the sidelines. Rumors, and tales of our challenges will fly much faster than we can move on to the next opponent. Let alone the 5th, 6th, etc...
We should take the risk and participate. We can avoid using those techniques we don't want known and get some experience with all of our opponents.
There is one very important distinction here: finding out rumors and tales is very different than getting a sense of someone's flaws and openings in a sparring match with them. Even a genius martial artist with Cao'er's perception can't form a strategy based on hearsay. At the end of the day, to form a strategy against Jing, they must actually see him in action, at the very least. I mean, getting info second-hand helps, but it's not the same thing as seeing what our technique is like in person. Besides, I am not even sure if these sect challenges even allow outsiders who aren't privy to it; treave ?
Nevertheless, this is a valid point. However, the same rule would apply if we vote A. Unless you plan on defeating all of them and winning the competition, you will not get a very clear picture of the style and flaws of all eight opponents. This is an elimination tournament, so the closer you get to the championship, the more familiar people are with you and the more you have to give up. We need to retain our unique advantages for as long as possible. You might get an idea of a few opponents, but you aren't going to get everybody. So really, the two-way flow of information is still favouring the enemy here.
Another thing to keep in mind is that your assessment assumes that Jing is the same fighter against Opponent #7 as he is against Opponent #1. While he will have the same fundamental weaknesses and attributes regardless due to his qi, he will develop a lot of techniques and abilities that will allow him to compensate for his opponent's knowledge of him as time progresses. We need that initial period where our opponents are completely ignorant of what we're capable of so that we can refine and develop new techniques through challenges, just as we did against Rong. This will keep them guessing.
I guess A is going to win by a landslide though, so it doesn't really matter. I'm not convinced that we can get them to underestimate us as Lambchop19 says, they aren't fools. If they know we've survived for a year and a half training under the Southern Maniac, then they aren't going to think we're a punk if we throw the match. Why would not fighting somehow make them think we're more badass? There is some appeal to A, but you don't have to invent reasons for it.
Last edited: