razvedchiki
Magister
some girl thats likes to stay fit has managed to beat denuvo......
I heard that the books are pretty bad,something like the doom books from way back in time . Just moving and shooting.
what did you expect from someone who writes down his experiences in a girly diary and then reads it out loud on a loading screen.Also it is painfully obvious that the writer is a virgin,all the body language and dialogue feels like you are in the friend zone and not her man. Also the protagonist lacks any voice or dialogue,it feels kind of weird when somebody is giving you a long monologue.
Exactly my thoughts while reading the first book. You have a game script basically. I think a much better fps could have been made based on it, and 4A have been skipping corners design wise, but they were going more for technical achievements than for fun FPS gameplay. Not to forget that this was also the heyday of the CoD shooter.I heard that the books are pretty bad,something like the doom books from way back in time . Just moving and shooting.
Whoever told you that is a MASSIVE dumbfuck (and probably havnt actually read the book), first Metro book is very interesting, it kind of does read like a video game, as main character is constantly moving to new "scenes" where he encounters monsters/characters. But the shooty is just a small part of it, there is a lot of neat stuff with horror, surreal, psychology, social experiments etc.
But unfortunately (and I hate to say this as I love Metro 2033), Glukhovsky is a one hit wonder, the second book is just bad. And his involvement with the games has made them worse...
And that is a bad book.Exactly my thoughts while reading the first book. You have a game script basically. I think a much better fps could have been made based on it, and 4A have been skipping corners design wise, but they were going more for technical achievements than for fun FPS gameplay. Not to forget that this was also the heyday of the CoD shooter.I heard that the books are pretty bad,something like the doom books from way back in time . Just moving and shooting.
Whoever told you that is a MASSIVE dumbfuck (and probably havnt actually read the book), first Metro book is very interesting, it kind of does read like a video game, as main character is constantly moving to new "scenes" where he encounters monsters/characters. But the shooty is just a small part of it, there is a lot of neat stuff with horror, surreal, psychology, social experiments etc.
But unfortunately (and I hate to say this as I love Metro 2033), Glukhovsky is a one hit wonder, the second book is just bad. And his involvement with the games has made them worse...
I don't know about that,it is pretty accurate score for the game. It is pretty mediocre popamole.you know that's most likely due to the move to the Epic Store.
I don't know about that,it is pretty accurate score for the game. It is pretty mediocre popamole.you know that's most likely due to the move to the Epic Store.
Oh keep on playing mate,it gets beyond bad in the next two parts. I just finished the forest one,it was great fun. You had to sneak around during the night,also the story wasn't bad,except a few stupid things . Also the baron from the desert was fun to listen on the radio.Played this for a few hours (just finished the technophobe church bit). The whole prologue was incredibly tedious, and all the fucking NPC blather! They just never stop yapping in those atrocious faux-Russian accents, usually all at once so you can't focus on any one conversation clearly. Oh yes, and the story thus far is beyond bsb. Does it improve much from this point? So far this is easily the worst of the series yet.
Ten years ago, you had CoD being the model for first person shooters. Today, you market your game as open world (and no amount of "but"s will change people's expectations), you get criticism from people who are already whiny little bitches, even when you don't give them a reason for it.Metacritic:
2033 - journo 80, user 80
Last light - journo 80, user 85
Exodus - journo 84, user 63