Gerrard
Arcane
- Joined
- Nov 5, 2007
- Messages
- 12,015
Weren't you paying attention?
Weren't you paying attention?
Amazon already has the infrastructure (AWS, not to be confused with Anonymous Wife Scholar) and already have Prime subscribers. They don't have the catalogue, either to sell or already sold. So the idea is interesting, but Amazon doesn't need Steam.Amazon's might realize their store can't compete and will either buy Steam to get their infrastructure and customer base, swallow a big player, or both.Amazon is slowly releasing their own storefront. Currently only free games that come with Prime subscription is in it, but that will change.
Microsoft paid $68 billion to Drog Black Tooth for his Arcanum mod contribution and the rest went to lawyers.They bought ActiBlizz to get the Arcanum IP. Smart.
Strongly disagree: 10 years ago people were saying that every game would be a mobile game and while mobile games grew well for a time those pesky "core gamers" still exist and still buy proper games. 3 years later the same hype machine was saying that everything would be streamed but streaming doesn't work (for latency reasons) for the huge fraction of game genres. 3 years after that the idea was the individual games would be subscription services lasting forever - this was the plan for Anthem (and for Halo Infinite) but the cracks are already starting to show: these games aren't as successful as planned.
These are all just short-lived boardroom memes. Game Pass is a better idea than most of these previous ones and will be a big thing but the suggestion that it will utterly displace the existing way is a fantasy. They're just making the common mistake of assuming that the future will displace the past completely but that only happens for a very small number of innovations.
The Kindle exists but people still read normal books. That's just how it will be with Game Pass.
Yeah, at that price I hope they're ready to get hands on. Activision has been on the cliff for what feels like decades.I would not take a hands off approach here if I were Microsoft. Lots of firing and restructuring to do. I would also reboot every single IP on Blizzard's side. This strikes me as a very poor acquisition.
I can't congratulate you out of principle. Holding Acti-Blizz during these lawsuits, with all the talent leeching away, with their esports failing, with China penalizing video games, everything going wrong.... its just retarded. But hey, a lot of retards also made money in this market, I guess.I don't play Actiblizz games, but I earned a lot of money today.
Best they've ever been, probably. Thing is it looks they are peaking, there isn't anything lined up for the next few years, plus lawsuits, etc, as I wrote above. Microsoft is buying the top, and I think they just want to waste dollars before inflation. They are talking about a "metaverse" play, and they could use Battlenet as their front to customers, and just to steal some games away from Sony by forcing exclusivity.How are Activision's finances looking these days?
I can't congratulate you out of principle. Holding Acti-Blizz during these lawsuits, with all the talent leeching away, with their esports failing, with China penalizing video games, everything going wrong.... its just retarded. But hey, a lot of retards also made money in this market, I guess.
Like I said, a nightmare scenario
You're assuming Microsoft didn't set them up with the recent negative PR. Probably dropped the price by several billion dollars and increased pressure on Activision to sell out to get rid of the negative brand recognition. I was kind of wondering why that news story broke about Activision. I figured they maybe didn't "donate" enough money to politicians recently, but it was so Microsoft could get this deal to go through.So, /pol/ was right again.. Not sure if buying such toxic assets is a good investment for Microsoft, but they probably bought everything in bulk to get that sweet battle royale cash
Microsoft: We need to take the Apple approach and make Windows a walled garden. We'll get a cut of all the software sales!
Gaben: Like hell you will! I'll make Linux a viable gaming platform!
Microsoft: Good luck.
*Years pass*
Gaben: Hey Microsoft. Checkout out this Linux-powered console!
Microsoft: Oh yeah? Well how will your little gaming storefront fare if it has no games to sell?
Gaben: ...shit.
Microsoft is buying the top, and I think they just want to waste dollars before inflation. They are talking about a "metaverse" play, and they could use Battlenet as their front to customers, and just to steal some games away from Sony by forcing exclusivity.
Nothing wrong with making money, nice oneI don't play Actiblizz games, but I earned a lot of money today.
And may he live forever.Valve won't be sold as long as Gabe lives. You better pray he has a long life ahead.Amazon's might realize their store can't compete and will either buy Steam to get their infrastructure and customer base, swallow a big player, or both.Amazon is slowly releasing their own storefront. Currently only free games that come with Prime subscription is in it, but that will change.
I think the biggest challenge for indies is that regardless of some of the quality of their games, they still suffer a bit from price depreciation due to so many market entrants.
So a quality game that could have sold for $20.00 before the Steam boom now has to start at $15.00 before discounts/sales to make the same volume.
At the end of the day the boom-bust model will continue just like all other growth industries. Consolidation is inevitable.
IP-gobbling publisher THQ Nordic announced today that they'd acquired Logic Artist's Expeditions franchise
So we have Obsidian, inXile, Hairbraned Schemes, and now the main IP of Logic Artist being acquired.
I think we can safely say the A.5-AA rpg dev consolidation is well under way.
I guess the questions now are:
1.) Who is left?
2.) Who is next?