The_Pope
Scholar
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2005
- Messages
- 844
aries202 said:As for the story, there is a skimpy outfit reason as to why it progresses this way - at least according to the game's lead writer, David Gaider.
Fixed.
aries202 said:As for the story, there is a skimpy outfit reason as to why it progresses this way - at least according to the game's lead writer, David Gaider.
You could try not to speak out of your ass so often. That only happened with...take a guess...whores, and only after you helped their mistress.MetalCraze said:A sex-scene to which you get by giving a present and receiving a terrible flirting line in return?
Oh boy I hope they will give me collectrible cards for that.
Ty said:I can't understand the ceaseless criticism of barely clad women in a fantasy game (although that sounds funny).
Sometimes it comes up, sometimes not. I'd say 90% of every game with a woman in it, propagated a similar image (even PS:T did, enthusiastically so). That's why I never can take this serious. It always sounds like from some theater critic, who was suddenly condemned to write previews for videogames, and is almost surprised that such a thing exists but only remembers something similar from the shelves of the last bookstore. Or in short, it's pretentious and totally selective.
But I can relate to the criticism of the dialog itself. I feared as much. But I suppose this might just be the cheeky „Joss Whedon“-tone which David Gaider is so fond of.
Mister Arkham said:Also, does Gaider really think that he's emulating or on-par with Joss Whedon?
aries202 said:If we compare Leliana's response (all is forgiven if you love me, really) with what can happen IRL, I don''t think the result differs much. (I do believe that Leliana is written by either Ms. Kirby or Ms. Chee...)
----
Sure... If you're the most moronic sort of misogynist.
There should seriously be an intelligence or stealth check on fucking some trollop within 5 feet of your sleeping "girlfriend".
Personally, I don't mind TW's attitude toward sex as much as DA's. Not because it done more maturely. It isn't, IMO. TW would have been fine with 5 fuckable women scattered accros the game. It was the amount that bothered me. But that is neither here nor there. In TW it was pretty much handled the way some macho "player" would handle it. That is consistent. But Bioware want to touch <s>little children</s> the players emotionally. They want to make a girly emo game. And that coupled with ridiculously easy to get to sex-scenes just does not compute.MetalCraze said:Ah you're right - some of them even didn't require a present. You're right - that game is more mature.
Shannow said:MetalCraze said:. And that coupled with ridiculously easy to get to sex-scenes just does not compute.
Clockwork Knight said:I think "easy to get" doesn't apply, it doesn't seem they are treating sex as a "reward", but as a narrative element.
bhlaab said:thanks for the book wanna stick it in me
Mr. Teatime said:Most people here I imagine saw this coming.
I just think computer developers need to grow up. Women in fantasy - be it games, books or films - often dress like whores and things go from there. Why? As the previewer says, it's pathetic and reeks of design from people who have actually met very few women. And it being an established convention only excuses intelligence and maturity.
At least Duke Nukem does it sort of tongue in cheek. When we're expected to take it seriously, well, it fails.
I'm no feminist; I just want semi-believable characters, even if the setting is fantastic; and this sort of stuff doesn't elicit anger so much as a feeling of pity.
EDIT: 'What do you expect from a bunch of sex-starved nerds trying to write romance?' qft
Lesifoere said:Mr. Teatime said:Most people here I imagine saw this coming.
I just think computer developers need to grow up. Women in fantasy - be it games, books or films - often dress like whores and things go from there. Why? As the previewer says, it's pathetic and reeks of design from people who have actually met very few women. And it being an established convention only excuses intelligence and maturity.
At least Duke Nukem does it sort of tongue in cheek. When we're expected to take it seriously, well, it fails.
I'm no feminist; I just want semi-believable characters, even if the setting is fantastic; and this sort of stuff doesn't elicit anger so much as a feeling of pity.
EDIT: 'What do you expect from a bunch of sex-starved nerds trying to write romance?' qft
The tragic thing is, there're quite a few female gamers--chiefly those among Bioware's target audience, say--who are actually okay with this and lap this shit right up then turning on to accuse those asking for semi-believable characters and so-called "maturity" as taking games too seriously. "So? I like to play scantily clad D&D whores and take absolutely no offense at Bioware's women! You're just a prude/don't have a sense of humor/don't have a sense of fun!" That kind of thing.
(I imagine Bioware developers, being fairly well-off, probably have actually had sex if only with women they have to pay.)
If this hadn't been tongue-in-cheek, and true to the spirit of the books, I would have given a damn.MetalCraze said:A sex-scene to which you get by giving a present and receiving a terrible flirting line in return?
Oh boy I hope they will give me collectrible cards for that.