Volourn said:" for BG1, it was fucking awful."
No.
nomask7 said:Some of the above comments come from 14-year-old nerds who think D&D combat can be tactical just like chess and are still fascinated by basic things like putting shit in their mouth (think of babies), but can't really appreciate more subtle, adult stuff like HotU and MotB (great atmosphere, story, setting).
Biges said:So you basically recommend going NWN2 full with all expansions and so?
nomask7 said:Butthurt much that the best chess player in the history of chess agreed with me on chess?
nomask7 said:PS. anything NWN > anything BG
Actually, he did.VentilatorOfDoom said:PS: Fischer didn't agree with you
Matt7895 said:Volourn said:" for BG1, it was fucking awful."
No.
Yes.
Running around empty maps hacking up mobs with a god-awful combat system? It was fucking AWFUL.
Volourn said:No. NWN had more tatics in it spinky finger than BG did in the netire 1 billion hours of empty space. R00fles!
Serious_Business said:I love this. NWN had more tactics than BG? You mean the two games that had barely any tactics in them?
Volourn said:"NWN1 was just awful because D&D is built around having a party, and NWN1 didn't let you create one."
Yes, it did. Don't fuckin' lie.
Volourn said:You are a fuckin' retard. You fit right in here.
The fact you defended a game based on hype just proves you are a retard, and can't be taken seriously.
Someone so gullible as to allow OTHERS to form their opinions is a tool, and therefore a retard.
Let the big boys who are capable of making their own decisions do the debating. I don't have time for little boys = that's for other Codexian perverts - I try to discss games with people who have their own brains, and use them.
NWN1 is awesome. Just fuckin' deal with it.
Volourn said:Do a search. I've 'defended' NWN plenty of times. Stop being lazy.
Don't flame someone and then act all shocked they flamed you back. LMAO