merry andrew
Erudite
Aha, I might have to try that. Thanks.
Vault Dweller said:<a>Gothic 3</a> has just been released in North America and we are pleased to influence your buying decision with this <a>review</a>:
Really? That must've been very hard, given the density of agressive animals and combat being a primary source of experience. So at level one everything can kill you really fast, you are certain to encounter something hostile a few steps from the starting location, and you enjoyed not needing to be violent. You must've been running through the games, literally.merry andrew said:I understand that the world of Gothic is incredibly violent, and I thoroughly enjoyed the first two of the series for that reason among many others... but the fun for me was being able to make my way through that world without needing to be violent.
Yeah, I usually get to speed potions as fast as I can, for quick travel, and tread very carefully and sneak around the rest of the time. I fought when I needed to. I like hard games, and if there's a difficulty slider, that was most likely on hard too. Playing that way makes it a better experience for me because even though there was a lot of violence, it never felt in excess or unimportant (like most action RPGs).Claw said:Really? That must've been very hard, given the density of agressive animals and combat being a primary source of experience. So at level one everything can kill you really fast, you are certain to encounter something hostile a few steps from the starting location, and you enjoyed not needing to be violent. You must've been running through the games, literally.
the_dagon said:- Graphics & soundtracks are great, but the game isn't optimized and it's buggy, and it's quite laggy.
- There's a great feeling of liberty in it, and that's the essence of RPGs, but they completely sacrificed the excellent storyline Gothic 1 & 2 had. Gothic 3 has a weak storyline at best, compared to the other ones
- combat... combat is a mess, it's awfully bad. And the problem is that it's about 80% of the game. I think it completely spoiled the game
Sorry about that, mister. I guess I simply missed the fact that the game was merely "allright". Had I known that I would have never given it such a good review. My mistake.the_dagon said:This is not in RPGCODEX style to give such high praises for a game which is just "allright". This review should be more "balanced"
Excellent storyline in Gothic 1: you are thrown in a prison camp and must a) survive, b) find a way out, which slowly transforms - no matter what camp you join - into c) must kill the sleeper.... but they completely sacrificed the excellent storyline Gothic 1 & 2 had. Gothic 3 has a weak storyline at best, compared to the other ones.
And what percentage combat was in the second game?- combat... combat is a mess, it's awfully bad. And the problem is that it's about 80% of the game. I think it completely spoiled the game
Like what?Remember the capital in Gothic 2. Almost every character had something interesting to say...
That is the stupidest thing I've ever heard. Have you even played Oblivion?I'm no Elder scroll fan, but my feeling is that the Elder scroll serie is moving more and more toward Gothic 1 style (good scenario), and the Gothic serie is moving more and more toward the old Elder scroll style (weak scenario)...
Can't you read?but let's recenter on what I said : the review lacks balancing. Where are the negative points ? Because there are some, for sure !
suibhne said:Many reviews mentioned the music, tho VD didn't spend much time on it b/c I think he just hates music, art, and all other trappings of civilized human life.