I agree in this case, since the DLC is pretty small.there is no reason to split the threads though
other than chicanery
Infinitron happened to this thread, is what happened.So what happened to this thread Infinitron?
And in both cases, it's true. Quit fucking with the threads like that, especially when Owlcat doesn't have a sub-forum where this could more easily be followed.We just can't have non-Obsidian games having more popular threads.
It's funny because I did exactly the same thing with PoE2 - when the first DLC was released, I split the thread starting from the post where the DLC was announced (so that the new split thread starts out with a good chunk of posts in it already).
Yet in both cases, I'm accused of trying to make PoE2 look more popular. :D (in the former case, because I supposedly set out to make it look like a bunch of people were playing the Beast of Winter DLC since the new thread included many pages of discussion about the base game).
why "expansion don't count"?Also, ToB was an expansion, why not compare the design of combat encounters endgame SoA and endgame Kingmaker.
And it postpones the most useful arcana by 3 levels. . The class is basically a gigantic trap which forces you to endure hardships stuck to one weapon hoping for the big reward at the end when your teammates are using all the good weapons you find along the way.
Saint does not get Proficiency in weapons that are not his focus. So he can not wield them,
Is this not against core rules? well at least I imagine most GM's wouldn't allow a dog to wear a ring but possibly an amulet. Maybe.Mentioning it here, since I mentioned it in the Builds Thread. Animal Companions can now equip items.
They don't have much in the way of proficiencies, but amulets and rings are fair game.
Pathfinder has a list of which slots animals can wear.Is this not against core rules? well at least I imagine most GM's wouldn't allow a dog to wear a ring but possibly an amulet. Maybe.
Jesus H fucking Christ, that's gon' be crazy.Mentioning it here, since I mentioned it in the Builds Thread. Animal Companions can now equip items.
They don't have much in the way of proficiencies, but amulets and rings are fair game.
PnP/TT games usually have a lot of de facto limitations, however. For example, armors that you find generally cannot be equipped by animals - they need to be a specific type of armor (bardings, etc.) You usually cannot take something and slap it onto your animal companion and call it a day. Try to make your horse wear a pair of boots, for example, or slip your hoodie onto a bear.Pathfinder has a list of which slots animals can wear.Is this not against core rules? well at least I imagine most GM's wouldn't allow a dog to wear a ring but possibly an amulet. Maybe.
I don't think Kingmaker gets that specific, so you're on the honor system.
They can, in fact, use Frigid Touch as much as they want.