Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Pathfinder Pathfinder: Wrath of the Righteous Beta Thread [GAME RELEASED, GO TO NEW THREAD]

Joined
Jan 14, 2018
Messages
50,754
Codex Year of the Donut
reasons for hunters to exist when rangers also exist:
 
Joined
Jan 14, 2018
Messages
50,754
Codex Year of the Donut
rangers protect the woods, hunters kill animals
but that's wrong
they essentially changed the ranger and made the traditional ranger a hunter

pathfinder is dumb
pyege5J.png


give the fighter class a feat called "master paladin" too
 

Desiderius

Found your egg, Robinett, you sneaky bastard
Patron
Joined
Jul 22, 2019
Messages
14,944
Insert Title Here Pathfinder: Wrath
Hunter has some decent archetypes. Really like Urban Hunter CM kangz, especially now that you pick feats and equipment for pet and you get +4 CMB spell at lvl 2 and three pieces of CMB equipment you can fuck things up.

Forester is lol since whole point of Hunter is focus more on pet. Ok, we’ll take away pet and since you now completely suck you get all the abilities.
 
Joined
Jan 14, 2018
Messages
50,754
Codex Year of the Donut
Forester is lol since whole point of Hunter is focus more on pet. Ok, we’ll take away pet and since you now completely suck you get all the abilities.
Forester is just going complete circle and remaking the original ranger except with a different name.
There's no reason for Hunter to exist at all, everything it does would have been fine as a ranger archetype. That was the entire point of archetypes.
 

Desiderius

Found your egg, Robinett, you sneaky bastard
Patron
Joined
Jul 22, 2019
Messages
14,944
Insert Title Here Pathfinder: Wrath
Slow Spell class can be annoying if you’re gishy. I don’t mind it. Warpriest is so much worse because you already have Inquisitor. There wasn’t anything like that for Nature Boys before (Druid is more equivalent to Cleric).

Doesn’t mean it was a good fit for this particular game tho.

For a more outdoorsy setting would be fine with Himterlander.
 

Shadenuat

Arcane
Joined
Dec 9, 2011
Messages
11,977
Location
Russia
Warpriest would be better if their abilities actually worked.

But yes the class in pretty miserable. You trade all spells for micromanagement of Magus without actually being as strong and in the end get something weaker than 20 level Fighter.
 

Axioms

Arcane
Developer
Joined
Jul 11, 2019
Messages
1,630
None of these things would be a problem if rpg systems dumped classes/archetypes for talents/paths. Ie a Rogue is actually traps/perception/stealth/daggers or however you want to divide it.
 

InD_ImaginE

Arcane
Patron
Joined
Aug 23, 2015
Messages
6,052
Pathfinder: Wrath
The DIfference with Ranger and Hunter is trading full BAB for much better casting and access to Level 6 spells. They also have a better focus on Animal Companion vs Ranger who focused more on the favorite enemy and being badass arrow shooter.

You could arguably say that instead of hybrid, Hunter is something that is inbetween Ranger and Druid which is its own niche I guess.

The one that has an overlap niche is Warpriest. The holy warrior of gods that is in between Cleric and Paladin is pretty much an Inquisitor already. Both ended up having different class features but one is clearly better than the other.
 

Percy

Cipher
Joined
Sep 17, 2009
Messages
645
Location
Cunt
Also I think Wenduag
That's the conclusion of her quest. If you treat her with respect she likes that and doesn't betray you. If you uncover each stage of her plan she calls you a master of deception and doesn't betray you. If you haven't done any of the said things, yes she will betray you.

Also consider that Chapter 4 takes place in
And can you just attack everything on sight once you go to the abyss?

Don't kill the guards at nocticulas place before she talks to you, I wasn't able to get into her place afterwards and had to resume from another save.

You can kill most of the named slavers in slave markets. Make sure you do all quests needing slaves first of course.

You get into heaps of fights on the streets (so stay buffed) from named enemies and "commoners"

If you agree to go along with her plan (I think there's an alternative due to 2 other captains with ships) do not click on portal until you have the party you want, it bugged for me and I had to reload from an earlier save. This will make sense hopefully when you're at this stage done wanna spoil shit.

You can also give her both parts of paradox of lexicon and you can become her chosen or some shit but don't think those powers are in the game

It will end your mythic trickster cabinet thing if you're playing one.

I lost quite a lot of time in chapter 4 due to bugs, have multiple saves (i mean we should be doing this anyway)
 
Joined
Jan 14, 2018
Messages
50,754
Codex Year of the Donut
The DIfference with Ranger and Hunter is trading full BAB for much better casting and access to Level 6 spells. They also have a better focus on Animal Companion vs Ranger who focused more on the favorite enemy and being badass arrow shooter.

You could arguably say that instead of hybrid, Hunter is something that is inbetween Ranger and Druid which is its own niche I guess.

The one that has an overlap niche is Warpriest. The holy warrior of gods that is in between Cleric and Paladin is pretty much an Inquisitor already. Both ended up having different class features but one is clearly better than the other.
"the entire reason for this class existing is a tiny technical change"
gary gygax looks down on you with shame
 

frajaq

Erudite
Joined
Oct 5, 2017
Messages
2,603
Location
Brazil
I was planning to go as a Warpriest of Gorum but from reading past posts I should just go Inquisitor instead?
 

InD_ImaginE

Arcane
Patron
Joined
Aug 23, 2015
Messages
6,052
Pathfinder: Wrath
I was planning to go as a Warpriest of Gorum but from reading past posts I should just go Inquisitor instead?

I mean there is nothing stopping you. While WotR is difficult you will do just fine as Warpriest. I finished 1 Alpha playthrough with one without much of a hassle. It's just Inquisitor Class Feature being better overall.
 

Desiderius

Found your egg, Robinett, you sneaky bastard
Patron
Joined
Jul 22, 2019
Messages
14,944
Insert Title Here Pathfinder: Wrath
Both suffer from short duration/limited activations but that’s less of a problem in Wrath.

Warpriest can spike pretty well and that fits well with what you need.

The thing it most competes with is Cleric Crusader archetype which has its own issues. I guess if you want to Shield Bash go Crusader while if you don’t Warpriest is dece.
 

frajaq

Erudite
Joined
Oct 5, 2017
Messages
2,603
Location
Brazil
I was planning to go as a Warpriest of Gorum but from reading past posts I should just go Inquisitor instead?

I mean there is nothing stopping you. While WotR is difficult you will do just fine as Warpriest. I finished 1 Alpha playthrough with one without much of a hassle. It's just Inquisitor Class Feature being better overall.

Well I am interested since its not like the game will react to me being an Warpriest/Inquisitor or have exclusive Warpriest/Inquisitor dialogue options (like it would in Pillars of Eternity) so I might as well go for the mechanical best class for Melee Fighter of a Certain Deity character since classes are so close to each other
 

Desiderius

Found your egg, Robinett, you sneaky bastard
Patron
Joined
Jul 22, 2019
Messages
14,944
Insert Title Here Pathfinder: Wrath
Well it’s a Crusade so why not play a Crusader and get to the fun high level spells?
 

Sjukob

Arcane
Joined
Jul 3, 2015
Messages
2,093
frajaq
I don't know how's warpriest in wrath, but I was pretty disappointed with it in kingmaker with CoTW installed.
  1. Blessings are basically just castrated domains;
  2. Sacred weapon is only really good for some specific stuff, like light weapons or shield bashes. Damage increase for bigger weapons is marginal and takes overly long to get;
  3. The weapon enchantments last only 1 round! Yes, you have several charges, but it's still awful;
  4. You are still 0,75 BAB class, same as cleric, but can only access level 6 spells at best;
  5. Worse channeling;
  6. Sacred armor is whatever, "protection from energy" spells are easily accessible;
  7. Swift self buffing is ok, but you can buff before entering combat.
The only build that I found interesting is cult leader with kukris. Feral champion might be decent, haven't looked into it. Overall I agree with Desiderius, just pick a crusader. It's the same bab and bonus feats, but with a full spell progression and good channeling.
 

Desiderius

Found your egg, Robinett, you sneaky bastard
Patron
Joined
Jul 22, 2019
Messages
14,944
Insert Title Here Pathfinder: Wrath
The rnd/lvl stuff does eventually get there when you're using it to spike on bosses. See Bane Weapon on Inquisitor.

I feel like a couple of the setting specific subtypes should turn out decent. You end up getting a good many extra feats I think?
 
Last edited:

Desiderius

Found your egg, Robinett, you sneaky bastard
Patron
Joined
Jul 22, 2019
Messages
14,944
Insert Title Here Pathfinder: Wrath
Don't think so but don't really need it to if you just turn it on for boss fights. All the unlimited stuff matters less in Wrath than it would have in P:K.
 

Percy

Cipher
Joined
Sep 17, 2009
Messages
645
Location
Cunt
Chapter 4 has been pretty good in my opinion after my initial concerns.

I found the abyss idea a bit annoying at first, because doesn't seem the right place to put good aligned players and some of the writing is a bit over the top, but at the pointier end of the chapter I've found it very interesting.

I am not sure what's bugged/incomplete though, so for anyone who has gotten through most of the chapter:

After encounter with Baphomet, have you been able to get back to Golarion through the portal in the Nexus?
There was some diaogue about feeling stronger too - I assume supposed to get a Mythic level but didn't seem too trigger for me.
I've done the Nexus part but for the life of me can't figure out the next bit.

On a non spoiler level, you can "spend time with" a creature called the fulsome queen if you're a trickster. She is described as being a creature of shit basically.
 

ChildInTime

Savant
Joined
Jun 13, 2019
Messages
646
Chapter 4 has been pretty good in my opinion after my initial concerns.

I found the abyss idea a bit annoying at first, because doesn't seem the right place to put good aligned players and some of the writing is a bit over the top, but at the pointier end of the chapter I've found it very interesting.

I am not sure what's bugged/incomplete though, so for anyone who has gotten through most of the chapter:

After encounter with Baphomet, have you been able to get back to Golarion through the portal in the Nexus?
There was some diaogue about feeling stronger too - I assume supposed to get a Mythic level but didn't seem too trigger for me.
I've done the Nexus part but for the life of me can't figure out the next bit.

On a non spoiler level, you can "spend time with" a creature called the fulsome queen if you're a trickster. She is described as being a creature of shit basically.
That's it for the beta for now.

Anyway, can anyone post the picture with all the demon aspects?
 

Seari

Arcane
Patron
Joined
Nov 25, 2014
Messages
849
Pathfinder: Wrath
That's it for the beta for now.

Anyway, can anyone post the picture with all the demon aspects?

Skip to 3:06

Edit: This guy is covering the beta if anyone is interested.
 
Last edited:

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom