Jermu
Arbiter
- Joined
- Aug 13, 2017
- Messages
- 1,644
7 or 8 cant remb anymoreA spoiler-ish question for those on later chapters. What is the highest level of bracers of Armour you have found?
7 or 8 cant remb anymoreA spoiler-ish question for those on later chapters. What is the highest level of bracers of Armour you have found?
7 or 8 cant remb anymoreA spoiler-ish question for those on later chapters. What is the highest level of bracers of Armour you have found?
I personally do not see it that way. It's the same thing as with gendered adjectives. If your language already has them, it'd be weird as fuck to use the male termination for an adjective just because it has no gendered implication.In trying to combat the traditional conceptions, feminists inadvertently imply a difference in function and ability as well -- as if a female doctor would "function", i.e. diagnose, treat patients, differently than a male doctor would have. That's the kind of unintentional sexism of gendered nomina agentis nouns that I mean.
Something like Russian or Italian on the other hand should generalize the usage of gendered declinations.
Which is a good thing imho. Either you gender all such nouns or you gender none.Hence, nowadays, a president (male) is called "Presidente" (old generic title from latin using "E") while we use "Presidentessa" for a female one. "Dottoressa" followed the same fate, my mother always insisted she's called a "Dottore"
A spoiler-ish question for those on later chapters. What is the highest level of bracers of Armour you have found?
We agree to desagree on that then.
I am a little fed up with the abuse of the flat footed status. I don't know about Pathfinder but when I used to play 3.5D&D flat footed was only applied when there was an actual surprise attack, not just when you opened a door in an obvious combat area and are more than expecting an enemy in every hall and corridor. Hell! sometimes a combat will end for a fraction of a second and then a new enemy will come and flat foot the whole party once more. It's silly design.
And don't get me going about the charge bug, that makes a charge fail and waste the action. I guess this will be fixed eventually, but toning down "flat footed" would actually be appreciated very much.
D&D 3.5:I am a little fed up with the abuse of the flat footed status. I don't know about Pathfinder but when I used to play 3.5D&D flat footed was only applied when there was an actual surprise attack, not just when you opened a door in an obvious combat area and are more than expecting an enemy in every hall and corridor. Hell! sometimes a combat will end for a fraction of a second and then a new enemy will come and flat foot the whole party once more. It's silly design.
And don't get me going about the charge bug, that makes a charge fail and waste the action. I guess this will be fixed eventually, but toning down "flat footed" would actually be appreciated very much.
Pathfinder:Flat-Footed
A character who has not yet acted during a combat is flat-footed, not yet reacting normally to the situation. A flat-footed character loses his Dexterity bonus to AC (if any) and cannot make attacks of opportunity.
Same thing in both games: you're flat-footed until your first turn.Flat-Footed
A character who has not yet acted during a combat is flat-footed, unable to react normally to the situation. A flat-footed character loses his Dexterity bonus to AC and Combat Maneuver Defense (CMD) (if any) and cannot make attacks of opportunity, unless he has the Combat Reflexes feat or Uncanny Dodge class ability.
Characters with Uncanny Dodge retain their Dexterity bonus to their AC and can make attacks of opportunity before they have acted in the first round of combat.
Naturally, but depending on the way in which a spoken language has evolved, a literary standard should try to chisel it by removing as many irregularities as possible in light of those preexisting tendencies (so in this case: predominant usage of gendered nouns -> gendering of all nouns; no gendering of most nouns -> no gendering of any nouns).I would say there is not much merit in forcing language into a specific mold, because that inevitable leads to the population not understanding each other.
And that doesn't sound like a good idea.
But new enemies appearing when you looking combat log after battle is textbookHell! sometimes a combat will end for a fraction of a second and then a new enemy will come and flat foot the whole party once more.
You are NOT ready.surprise attack
Naturally, but depending on the way in which a spoken language has evolved, a literary standard should try to chisel it by removing as many irregularities as possible in light of those preexisting tendencies (so in this case: predominant usage of gendered nouns -> gendering of all nouns; no gendering of most nouns -> no gendering of any nouns).I would say there is not much merit in forcing language into a specific mold, because that inevitable leads to the population not understanding each other.
Kicked out Lady Konami and I'm going to proclaim my independence.I see you played her like a goddamn fiddle.Devilishly so.
Starting over, I want to go Lich (preferable a martial/caster hybrid.).
Any recommendations for a Lich Martial hybrid class?
I will commit the sacrilegious sin and say if you want to play a hybrid lich, go Sorc 9, Monk 1, Eldritch Knight 10.Starting over, I want to go Lich (preferable a martial/caster hybrid.).
Any recommendations for a Lich Martial hybrid class?
I don’t like playing pure casters.Starting over, I want to go Lich (preferable a martial/caster hybrid.).
Any recommendations for a Lich Martial hybrid class?
Go pure caster if lich. Merging spellbook is amazing. I suggest Thassilon specialist and Cruoromancer.
Do you dip into monk once for the AC bonus stuff? Also, since necromancer is necro spells, are they generally useful against demons? As an EK, do I need to specialize in a certain weapon (aka look up what weapon I want to use) or just not take it and use any weapon I find?I will commit the sacrilegious sin and say if you want to play a hybrid lich, go Sorc 9, Monk 1, Eldritch Knight 10.Starting over, I want to go Lich (preferable a martial/caster hybrid.).
Any recommendations for a Lich Martial hybrid class?
Or just the 1 monk-sorcerer- 4 dragondisciple- 10 eldritchknight classic build. You are also merging the book, gaining ton of AC, can also melee with a staff so using lich buffs to its fullest. What are you losing ? A few spell slots compare to other builds , one CL.Starting over, I want to go Lich (preferable a martial/caster hybrid.).
Any recommendations for a Lich Martial hybrid class?
Go pure caster if lich. Merging spellbook is amazing. I suggest Thassilon specialist and Cruoromancer.
I will commit the sacrilegious sin and say if you want to play a hybrid lich, go Sorc 9, Monk 1, Eldritch Knight 10.