Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Pathfinder Pathfinder: Wrath of the Righteous Pre-DLC Thread [GO TO NEW THREAD]

Vatnik Wumao
Joined
Oct 2, 2018
Messages
19,826
Hence, nowadays, a president (male) is called "Presidente" (old generic title from latin using "E") while we use "Presidentessa" for a female one. "Dottoressa" followed the same fate, my mother always insisted she's called a "Dottore"
Which is a good thing imho. Either you gender all such nouns or you gender none.

(Although I should emphasize that my stance is purely a matter of linguistic preference rather than something ideological. Ordnung muss sein and all that.)
 

Reinhardt

Arcane
Joined
Sep 4, 2015
Messages
32,383
So there is trap on the street in the mid level in Abyss. I decided to dimension door over it and disable it. And somehow ended on some roof on another side of the map.
 

Riel

Arcane
Joined
Apr 29, 2012
Messages
1,559
Location
Itaca
I am a little fed up with the abuse of the flat footed status. I don't know about Pathfinder but when I used to play 3.5D&D flat footed was only applied when there was an actual surprise attack, not just when you opened a door in an obvious combat area and are more than expecting an enemy in every hall and corridor. Hell! sometimes a combat will end for a fraction of a second and then a new enemy will come and flat foot the whole party once more. It's silly design.

And don't get me going about the charge bug, that makes a charge fail and waste the action. I guess this will be fixed eventually, but toning down "flat footed" would actually be appreciated very much.
 

Lord of Riva

Arcane
Patron
Joined
Jan 16, 2018
Messages
2,873
Strap Yourselves In Pathfinder: Wrath
We agree to desagree on that then.

The argument is faulty. I do make a point to not gender myself because we do differentiate Genus and Sexus in out language and conflating the two has a myriad of issues.

But I agree with Magnat in the sense that languages evolve in a way for a reason, if these things have been evolved normally through use then there is nothing wrong with it.
I would say there is not much merit in forcing language into a specific mold, because that inevitable leads to the population not understanding each other.

And that doesn't sound like a good idea.
 

Tacgnol

Shitlord
Patron
Joined
Oct 12, 2010
Messages
1,871,884
Codex 2016 - The Age of Grimoire Grab the Codex by the pussy RPG Wokedex Strap Yourselves In Codex Year of the Donut Shadorwun: Hong Kong Divinity: Original Sin 2 Steve gets a Kidney but I don't even get a tag. Pathfinder: Wrath I helped put crap in Monomyth
I am a little fed up with the abuse of the flat footed status. I don't know about Pathfinder but when I used to play 3.5D&D flat footed was only applied when there was an actual surprise attack, not just when you opened a door in an obvious combat area and are more than expecting an enemy in every hall and corridor. Hell! sometimes a combat will end for a fraction of a second and then a new enemy will come and flat foot the whole party once more. It's silly design.

And don't get me going about the charge bug, that makes a charge fail and waste the action. I guess this will be fixed eventually, but toning down "flat footed" would actually be appreciated very much.

They follow the same rules as 3.5.

You're flat footed if you haven't acted in combat yet, it isn't just surprise rounds.
 

NJClaw

OoOoOoOoOoh
Patron
Joined
Aug 30, 2016
Messages
7,621
Location
Pronouns: rusts/rusty
Pathfinder: Wrath I'm very into cock and ball torture
I am a little fed up with the abuse of the flat footed status. I don't know about Pathfinder but when I used to play 3.5D&D flat footed was only applied when there was an actual surprise attack, not just when you opened a door in an obvious combat area and are more than expecting an enemy in every hall and corridor. Hell! sometimes a combat will end for a fraction of a second and then a new enemy will come and flat foot the whole party once more. It's silly design.

And don't get me going about the charge bug, that makes a charge fail and waste the action. I guess this will be fixed eventually, but toning down "flat footed" would actually be appreciated very much.
D&D 3.5:

Flat-Footed
A character who has not yet acted during a combat is flat-footed, not yet reacting normally to the situation. A flat-footed character loses his Dexterity bonus to AC (if any) and cannot make attacks of opportunity.
Pathfinder:

Flat-Footed
A character who has not yet acted during a combat is flat-footed, unable to react normally to the situation. A flat-footed character loses his Dexterity bonus to AC and Combat Maneuver Defense (CMD) (if any) and cannot make attacks of opportunity, unless he has the Combat Reflexes feat or Uncanny Dodge class ability.

Characters with Uncanny Dodge retain their Dexterity bonus to their AC and can make attacks of opportunity before they have acted in the first round of combat.
Same thing in both games: you're flat-footed until your first turn.
 
Vatnik Wumao
Joined
Oct 2, 2018
Messages
19,826
I would say there is not much merit in forcing language into a specific mold, because that inevitable leads to the population not understanding each other.
Naturally, but depending on the way in which a spoken language has evolved, a literary standard should try to chisel it by removing as many irregularities as possible in light of those preexisting tendencies (so in this case: predominant usage of gendered nouns -> gendering of all nouns; no gendering of most nouns -> no gendering of any nouns).
 

Lord of Riva

Arcane
Patron
Joined
Jan 16, 2018
Messages
2,873
Strap Yourselves In Pathfinder: Wrath
I would say there is not much merit in forcing language into a specific mold, because that inevitable leads to the population not understanding each other.
Naturally, but depending on the way in which a spoken language has evolved, a literary standard should try to chisel it by removing as many irregularities as possible in light of those preexisting tendencies (so in this case: predominant usage of gendered nouns -> gendering of all nouns; no gendering of most nouns -> no gendering of any nouns).

Well, it's like with "Hochdeutsch" having one language with specific meanings is greatly more beneficial than having naturally evolved dialects.

But still, the value of language is it's capacity to be used for communication that should be the main imperative. Having unclear rules is definitely something I would as well "chisel out" however from experience from our reforms trying to force that down simply does not work.

We had the "Neue Rechtschreibreform" in germany when I was a child, now nearly no-one applies ß correctly anymore. And the word "Photo" is now "Foto" but Photovoltaik is still Photovoltaik. Humans are such a Mess...

But let's not further derail the thread, I should really stop jumping on every interesting sentence that promises interesting debate.

EDIT: I guess it somewhat boils to the fact that we want to reach our goal as fast as possible and that is simply not doable. Change comes over generations, "Nobody" speaks "Plattdeutsch" anymore in my gernation, My Mother spoke mostly Hochdeutsch, my grandparents basically always Platt.

It's always a matter of time.
 

Sunri

Liturgist
Joined
Apr 16, 2020
Messages
2,919
Location
Poland
stolen image
t4o4vjimezn71.png
 

Urthor

Prophet
Patron
Joined
Mar 22, 2015
Messages
1,880
Pillars of Eternity 2: Deadfire
Wrath of the Righteous ground to a halt at the start of Act 5 with a corrupted cache bug, and there's like 3-4 other bugs to dodge at the end of Act 4.

Shouldn't play this game haha, it's actually unplayable, grinds to 3 FPS unless I continually quit the game and delete a cache folder.
 

smaug

Secular Koranism with Israeli Characteristics
Patron
Dumbfuck
Joined
Feb 20, 2019
Messages
7,146
Location
Texas
Insert Title Here
Starting over, I want to go Lich (preferable a martial/caster hybrid.).

Any recommendations for a Lich Martial hybrid class?
 

Cryomancer

Arcane
Glory to Ukraine
Joined
Jul 11, 2019
Messages
17,255
Location
Frostfell
Starting over, I want to go Lich (preferable a martial/caster hybrid.).

Any recommendations for a Lich Martial hybrid class?

Go pure caster if lich. Merging spellbook is amazing. I suggest Thassilon specialist and Cruoromancer.
 

Sharpedge

Prophet
Joined
Sep 14, 2018
Messages
1,061
Starting over, I want to go Lich (preferable a martial/caster hybrid.).

Any recommendations for a Lich Martial hybrid class?
I will commit the sacrilegious sin and say if you want to play a hybrid lich, go Sorc 9, Monk 1, Eldritch Knight 10.
 

smaug

Secular Koranism with Israeli Characteristics
Patron
Dumbfuck
Joined
Feb 20, 2019
Messages
7,146
Location
Texas
Insert Title Here
Starting over, I want to go Lich (preferable a martial/caster hybrid.).

Any recommendations for a Lich Martial hybrid class?

Go pure caster if lich. Merging spellbook is amazing. I suggest Thassilon specialist and Cruoromancer.
I don’t like playing pure casters.
Starting over, I want to go Lich (preferable a martial/caster hybrid.).

Any recommendations for a Lich Martial hybrid class?
I will commit the sacrilegious sin and say if you want to play a hybrid lich, go Sorc 9, Monk 1, Eldritch Knight 10.
Do you dip into monk once for the AC bonus stuff? Also, since necromancer is necro spells, are they generally useful against demons? As an EK, do I need to specialize in a certain weapon (aka look up what weapon I want to use) or just not take it and use any weapon I find?
 

Mortmal

Arcane
Joined
Jun 15, 2009
Messages
9,557
Starting over, I want to go Lich (preferable a martial/caster hybrid.).

Any recommendations for a Lich Martial hybrid class?

Go pure caster if lich. Merging spellbook is amazing. I suggest Thassilon specialist and Cruoromancer.
Or just the 1 monk-sorcerer- 4 dragondisciple- 10 eldritchknight classic build. You are also merging the book, gaining ton of AC, can also melee with a staff so using lich buffs to its fullest. What are you losing ? A few spell slots compare to other builds , one CL.
If you really like minions, Cruomancer get a +4 bonus to hit on undead summons, that adds to the +6 you get to the lich path but you get it quite late. Thasilonian , i tried it it works but the two extra spell slots dont work with lich spells.
All valid choices but i think the sorcerer will have an easier time.
 

Parabalus

Arcane
Joined
Mar 23, 2015
Messages
17,521
Starting over, I want to go Lich (preferable a martial/caster hybrid.).

Any recommendations for a Lich Martial hybrid class?

Go pure caster if lich. Merging spellbook is amazing. I suggest Thassilon specialist and Cruoromancer.
I don’t like playing pure casters.
Starting over, I want to go Lich (preferable a martial/caster hybrid.).

Any recommendations for a Lich Martial hybrid class?
I will commit the sacrilegious sin and say if you want to play a hybrid lich, go Sorc 9, Monk 1, Eldritch Knight 10.
Do you dip into monk once for the AC bonus stuff? Also, since necromancer is necro spells, are they generally useful against demons? As an EK, do I need to specialize in a certain weapon (aka look up what weapon I want to use) or just not take it and use any weapon I find?

The spells Lich gets for melee are insane, and you can make the round/level buffs 24h long.

Go Sorc/Signifier/EK in some combination, Monk splash if above core. Vampiric Weapon + 4x Geniekind + Elemental Barrage for instance.

I wouldn't take anything which nerfs your CL too hard, big draw of Lich is you get higher level spells faster.
 

smaug

Secular Koranism with Israeli Characteristics
Patron
Dumbfuck
Joined
Feb 20, 2019
Messages
7,146
Location
Texas
Insert Title Here
Hold the phone, I know nothing about pathfinder. Going to have to look up this shit.
I will commit the sacrilegious sin and say if you want to play a hybrid lich, go Sorc 9, Monk 1, Eldritch Knight 10.

You could put in 4 levels of dragon disciple in there.
Why 4 levels of dragon disciple?
Starting over, I want to go Lich (preferable a martial/caster hybrid.).

Any recommendations for a Lich Martial hybrid class?

Go pure caster if lich. Merging spellbook is amazing. I suggest Thassilon specialist and Cruoromancer.
I don’t like playing pure casters.
Starting over, I want to go Lich (preferable a martial/caster hybrid.).

Any recommendations for a Lich Martial hybrid class?
I will commit the sacrilegious sin and say if you want to play a hybrid lich, go Sorc 9, Monk 1, Eldritch Knight 10.
Do you dip into monk once for the AC bonus stuff? Also, since necromancer is necro spells, are they generally useful against demons? As an EK, do I need to specialize in a certain weapon (aka look up what weapon I want to use) or just not take it and use any weapon I find?

The spells Lich gets for melee are insane, and you can make the round/level buffs 24h long.

Go Sorc/Signifier/EK in some combination, Monk splash if above core. Vampiric Weapon + 4x Geniekind + Elemental Barrage for instance.

I wouldn't take anything which nerfs your CL too hard, big draw of Lich is you get higher level spells faster.
Wouldn’t you need ascended element before elemental barrage? And why a hell knight signifier?
 

Mortmal

Arcane
Joined
Jun 15, 2009
Messages
9,557
Starting over, I want to go Lich (preferable a martial/caster hybrid.).

Any recommendations for a Lich Martial hybrid class?

Go pure caster if lich. Merging spellbook is amazing. I suggest Thassilon specialist and Cruoromancer.
I don’t like playing pure casters.
Starting over, I want to go Lich (preferable a martial/caster hybrid.).

Any recommendations for a Lich Martial hybrid class?
I will commit the sacrilegious sin and say if you want to play a hybrid lich, go Sorc 9, Monk 1, Eldritch Knight 10.

Do you dip into monk once for the AC bonus stuff? Also, since necromancer is necro spells, are they generally useful against demons? As an EK, do I need to specialize in a certain weapon (aka look up what weapon I want to use) or just not take it and use any weapon I find?
You dip in scaled fist monk for the charisma bonus , be sure and double check you have the monk subclass giving AC for your best stat. Lich specific spells are extremely good vs demons , as they bypass the spell resists, their resistance are quite absurd even if you stack up spell penetration and mythic feats . So exsanguinate, blood feast, negative eruption for distance. Vampiric blade when meleeing , bone shield . Also corrupt magic to debuff . In fact the lich spells are so good , regular necromancy spells pale compare to them so that makes thasilonian less interisting.Miniosn are good early , mid game, but late game not so much but that's only my opinion.
As for the wepaon you want quaterstaff as specialization, cause you can monk flurry with it.
 

Sharpedge

Prophet
Joined
Sep 14, 2018
Messages
1,061
Starting over, I want to go Lich (preferable a martial/caster hybrid.).

Any recommendations for a Lich Martial hybrid class?

Go pure caster if lich. Merging spellbook is amazing. I suggest Thassilon specialist and Cruoromancer.
I don’t like playing pure casters.
Starting over, I want to go Lich (preferable a martial/caster hybrid.).

Any recommendations for a Lich Martial hybrid class?
I will commit the sacrilegious sin and say if you want to play a hybrid lich, go Sorc 9, Monk 1, Eldritch Knight 10.
Do you dip into monk once for the AC bonus stuff? Also, since necromancer is necro spells, are they generally useful against demons? As an EK, do I need to specialize in a certain weapon (aka look up what weapon I want to use) or just not take it and use any weapon I find?
Yes, you dip monk for the AC stuff. Generally you would want to go TWF to take full advantage of EK, so I would recommend something like rapiers or daggers. Note that building something like this is probably worse than just making a pure caster, but if you are doing it purely because you enjoy the idea of a martial - caster hybrid, then why not.
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom