The Baldur's Gate thread is so inconceivably powerful that now THIS is a BG3 thread.
Deal with it.
Deal with it.
It stinks so bad, it corrupted it's neighbours.The Baldur's Gate thread is so inconceivably powerful that now THIS is a BG3 thread.
Deal with it.
It's not BG3, it's butthurt of haters.It stinks so bad
Of course not, they're in the wrong for completely different reasons. But you brought it up, saying that it was "shitting on normies", which is wrong. And thinking you're getting a "faithful" adaptation is just so hilariously fucking stupid, especially since we've seen game footage of D:OS3: The Barrelling, with absurd knock-backs and jumping around like mongoloids.You can shit on 5E all you want, but that doesn't mean Larian are the ones in the wrong.
Wrong. 4e may be the worst edition of D&D, but it wasn't half-assed. If it hadn't been called D&D and instead been used for a board-game type experience similar to Journeys in the Dark, it would actually have been great. Just not as an RPG.4E is the most half-assed one, though.
Well now you're just being absurd to the point where I'm starting to suspect that you're one of those D&D 5e normies that have never actually played anything else. Most D&D - even 3.X, which is my personal favorite - is at the bottom of the barrel in tabletop. Or, I guess, the disgusting foam that has risen to the surface, depending on how you see it.5E is still better than like 95% of systems out there.
They're perfectly free to make a D&D system, although preferably not 5e, especially in official nu-settings, but the better idea would probably be to not use existing systems at all. But Larian being deceitful cocksuckers have nothing to do with them using D&D or D&D 5e or whatever. It has everything to do with them relabeling their pre-production D:OS3 and selling it off as """Baldur's Gate""" """3""" as if there's any actual continuity whatsoever, whether systemic, personal, narrative, mechanical, conceptual, etc., and even making it clear that you're actually not at all interested in making a Baldur's Gate game. All they're interested in is the label for (((marketing purposes))), they obviously (and expressly) don't give a shit about anything else.With what system that is not D&D do you want them to make a game?
>You are absolutely free to suggest a better table-top RPG
Solasta: Crown of the Magister. Looks like a far better game then whatever shit DOS 3 will be.
Now you're speaking like Forex traders.About 10k more to go! Will the U meme prevail!? Or will the backwards J be our doom!
Solasta looks like shit. Purely aesthetically I mean. And isn't it still based on the OGL of 5E?>You are absolutely free to suggest a better table-top RPG
Solasta: Crown of the Magister. Looks like a far better game than whatever shit DOS 3 will be.
Solasta and BG3 are both based on the 5th edition of D&D.>You are absolutely free to suggest a better table-top RPG
Solasta: Crown of the Magister. Looks like a far better game than whatever shit DOS 3 will be.
Oh okay. Thanks. I thought they were talking about games.Solasta and BG3 are both based on the 5th edition of D&D.>You are absolutely free to suggest a better table-top RPG
Solasta: Crown of the Magister. Looks like a far better game than whatever shit DOS 3 will be.
They were talking about PnP systems.
Like I said, I think the better idea would be to not adapt a tabletop game at all. My commentary regarding D&D has nothing to do with any kind of adaptation, but is strictly based on actual tabletops, in which case we can just grab straight down into the barrel and grab Warhammer Fantasy Roleplay 2nd Ed., Dark Heresy/Rogue Trader/Black Crusade/Only War, Call of Cthulhu/Delta Green, Shadow of the Demon Lord, Pathfinder 1e, Starfinder, Vampire: the Masquared or Hunter: The Reckoning (oWoD, not gWoD), Shadowrun (pre-6e), FFG Star Wars RPG/Genesys, Traveller, Eclipse Phase 1e, Coriolis, FantasyCraft, and probably a few more I can't think of right now.You are absolutely free to suggest a better table-top RPG on which your dream game should be made. I am actually quite interested to see what you choose.
The latter knows exactly what it wants to be, which is what Pathfinder: Kingmaker was: A homage and spiritual successor to the Infinity Engine games, realized within a faithful adaptation of the Pathfinder 1e ruleset. The former is a game titled as a sequel to a series with which it has literally nothing in common, and where all references will by necessity be forced and constipated.Baldur's Gate III will be better than Wrath of the Righteous by purity alone. The latter doesn't know what it wants to be.
It is a sad state of the world when opposing the liars is looked down upon, but with every last ounce of my asspained butthurt, I will push past the hemorrhoids of complacency, and I will shit on evil!It's not BG3, it's butthurt of haters.It stinks so bad
Talking about G A M E S? Where do you think you are, young boy?Oh okay. Thanks. I thought they were talking about games.Solasta and BG3 are both based on the 5th edition of D&D.>You are absolutely free to suggest a better table-top RPG
Solasta: Crown of the Magister. Looks like a far better game than whatever shit DOS 3 will be.
They were talking about PnP systems.
Furry central.Where do you think you are?
The latter knows exactly what it wants to be, which is what Pathfinder: Kingmaker was: A homage and spiritual successor to the Infinity Engine games, realized within a faithful adaptation of the Pathfinder 1e ruleset.Baldur's Gate III will be better than Wrath of the Righteous by purity alone. The latter doesn't know what it wants to be.
The strategy game will probably suck, but, even if WotR ends up being a Kingmaker mod, it will still be a good RPG game.The latter knows exactly what it wants to be, which is what Pathfinder: Kingmaker was: A homage and spiritual successor to the Infinity Engine games, realized within a faithful adaptation of the Pathfinder 1e ruleset.Baldur's Gate III will be better than Wrath of the Righteous by purity alone. The latter doesn't know what it wants to be.
Nonsense. The IE games weren't constipated with feature bloat. Unlike them, this is a patchwork cadaver that happens when you lack purity of vision. Because it wants to be everything, it will be neither a good RPG, nor a good strategy game in the end.
Oh, no.Nonsense. The IE games weren't constipated with feature bloat. Unlike them, this is a patchwork cadaver that happens when you lack purity of vision. Because it wants to be everything, it will be neither a good RPG, nor a good strategy game in the end.
Please. Solasta looks like sterile crap. Its main selling point was verticality and lighting, the two areas where Baldur's Gate III already surpassed it. Tragic, really.
Which D&D climbing mechanics are you talking about? Because 5th edition climbing can be summarized in "you slowly walk upwards and you make a skill check if the dm tells you to".Please. Solasta looks like sterile crap. Its main selling point was verticality and lighting, the two areas where Baldur's Gate III already surpassed it. Tragic, really.
I wouldn't call jumping up cliffs like you're Jessica Jones peak verticality. It would have been better if Larian Incorporated DnDs climbing mechanics. Also knowing their larians encounter designs and lack off passion, Solasta could be the better game. I at least don't have to feel like a soulless sellout to play it
Oh, what a cute little noob ...
Oh, no.Nonsense. The IE games weren't constipated with feature bloat. Unlike them, this is a patchwork cadaver that happens when you lack purity of vision. Because it wants to be everything, it will be neither a good RPG, nor a good strategy game in the end.
It's retarded.