Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

KickStarter Phoenix Point - the new game from X-COM creator Julian Gollop

jazzotron

Liturgist
Joined
Jul 14, 2009
Messages
248
Does the enemy respond to noise independently etc. or is it the pod activation + free move of nuXCOM games.
 

ArchAngel

Arcane
Joined
Mar 16, 2015
Messages
21,309
Does the enemy respond to noise independently etc. or is it the pod activation + free move of nuXCOM games.
All enemies are active on the map, they just don't know about your presence there from round 1 and do their own thing instead. Once they are alerted they will change their priority to murdering you.
 

Grampy_Bone

Arcane
Joined
Jan 25, 2016
Messages
3,944
Location
Wandering the world randomly in search of maps
So far the whole "pod" concept doesn't seem to be a thing, but the cover system and map design in general feel a bit more haphazard and less polished than nuXcom. it also has those very large movement distances so enemies can pretty much close from across the map in a single round.

Still it seems like they took the framework of nuXcom but ditched the retardo simplification. Hmm, let me manage my own action points between movement and shooting? What a concept.
 
Joined
Jul 8, 2006
Messages
3,023
Does anyone else find the UI kind of ... "phonelike"? I got annoyed just playing the tutorial. Huge windows, huge text, most of the interface is mouse only, and can't remap the keyboard? I have no idea if the game itself is even fun yet as the UI is pushing me away.
its obviously for retarded couch gamers to sit on their smelly fart sofas and play with their controllers
 
Joined
Jul 8, 2006
Messages
3,023
Does anyone else find the UI kind of ... "phonelike"? I got annoyed just playing the tutorial. Huge windows, huge text, most of the interface is mouse only, and can't remap the keyboard? I have no idea if the game itself is even fun yet as the UI is pushing me away.
I talked about game made for tablets/phones. Basically what I said about new developers who grew up with cell phones and can't imagine proper interface, that applies to Phoenix Point as well.
also the generic looking apples, airplanes, "guy running" to indicate an exit etc...used for the UI is fucking horrible and reminds me of being at an airport or a baseball stadium looking for a toilet and is very jarring and not at all immersive. Not sure WTF they were thinking.
 

Xeon

Augur
Joined
Apr 9, 2013
Messages
1,858
Is there any benefits to helping out independent havens? Do they also offer special research and units I mean. I restarted to try and be as neutral as possible while also trying to helping out everyone to try and max their rep and have access to all their research. But the independent haven I found wants me to help a prisoner escape from Anu so that probably will cost me a lot of reputations if I accept.
 
Joined
Jan 9, 2011
Messages
2,826
Codex 2012 Codex 2013 Codex 2014 PC RPG Website of the Year, 2015 Codex 2016 - The Age of Grimoire Make the Codex Great Again! Grab the Codex by the pussy Insert Title Here RPG Wokedex Strap Yourselves In Codex Year of the Donut Codex+ Now Streaming! Enjoy the Revolution! Another revolution around the sun that is. Serpent in the Staglands Dead State Divinity: Original Sin Project: Eternity Torment: Tides of Numenera Wasteland 2 Codex USB, 2014 Shadorwun: Hong Kong Divinity: Original Sin 2 BattleTech Bubbles In Memoria A Beautifully Desolate Campaign Pillars of Eternity 2: Deadfire Pathfinder: Kingmaker Steve gets a Kidney but I don't even get a tag. My team has the sexiest and deadliest waifus you can recruit. Pathfinder: Wrath I'm very into cock and ball torture I helped put crap in Monomyth
The more I play PP, the more glaring is the fact that this is not a finished game, and that people making it don't really care much about it. Compare and contrast to Xenonauts 2, which is not released yet and looks better already.
  • both games have plenty of art that looks placeholder - except X2 is not released yet, and those placeholders are clearly labeled as such
  • both games don't allow you to rebind controls
  • PP gives better indication of whether you're in cover or not, ala nuxcom. In X2 you have to judge this by yourself. imo PP is better in this regard, it's nice QOL.
  • Both games have nice, rotatable 3d maps and soldiers
  • you can't zoom in X2, which is a shame, as the art looks nice (but that prob saves the devs for having to do too much details). You can zoom in PP but why would you, everything is so fucking hideous.
  • PP is nuxcom style AP, X2 is good old ufo:eu style
  • PP displays nicely on the ground how far you can move and still fire, this is a very nice QOL feature that X2 lacks
  • PP also indicates at which enemies you will be able to shoot at from your destination. Another QOL that should be implemented in x2
  • you can deploy way more soldiers in x2, so the whole thing feels more like ufo:eu meat grinder
  • you can move multiple soldiers at a time in x2, while in PP you have to wait for the movement animation to finish before you do anything with another soldier
  • maps in x2 feel much bigger than in pp
  • no direct-fire (VATS-style) in X2
  • in X2 you have your familiar research tree progression, while in PP it seems you're stuck at same level forever, and only get lots new research when you ally with a faction
  • PP aliens are quite original, x2 not so much
So, tl;dr X2 lacks some really nice QOL features, but feels more polished and labour-of-love than PP. PP is more to the riff of nuxcom, while X2 is firmly ufo:eu thing. PP is hidious, X2 looks very nice and stylised. Here's a brief let's play of 1st mission in X2, so you can see some art:
Mind, I love tactical games but I really suck at them.

GinLgTr.png

avArlcB.png

rlOdHsU.png

5uKaLq1.png

KXNPMfH.png

UHH7t4k.png

tvgWfMJ.png

Gim3riO.png

KEsqKyF.png

GjBKlqH.png


Whole thing on imgur: https://imgur.com/a/CvB8Bnw
 

Spockrock

Augur
Joined
Jan 2, 2011
Messages
457
some people in this thread are either delusional or just don't care about XCom in general.

if you need to scratch that XCom itch, PP is absolutely worth playing. it's not a bad game, it's just not much better than XCom Apocalypse, when it should be. this should have been the true XCom 4 -- the Dreamland Chronicles we never got, but it seems Gollop decided to play it safe and instead focus on making a solid basic multiplatform XCom game first. if this game does well, I'm sure he will make an expansion or a sequel that takes chances with basic concepts.

personally, I think this game is better than the two Firaxis games, and it's better than Xenonauts, FWIW.
 
Joined
Jan 9, 2011
Messages
2,826
Codex 2012 Codex 2013 Codex 2014 PC RPG Website of the Year, 2015 Codex 2016 - The Age of Grimoire Make the Codex Great Again! Grab the Codex by the pussy Insert Title Here RPG Wokedex Strap Yourselves In Codex Year of the Donut Codex+ Now Streaming! Enjoy the Revolution! Another revolution around the sun that is. Serpent in the Staglands Dead State Divinity: Original Sin Project: Eternity Torment: Tides of Numenera Wasteland 2 Codex USB, 2014 Shadorwun: Hong Kong Divinity: Original Sin 2 BattleTech Bubbles In Memoria A Beautifully Desolate Campaign Pillars of Eternity 2: Deadfire Pathfinder: Kingmaker Steve gets a Kidney but I don't even get a tag. My team has the sexiest and deadliest waifus you can recruit. Pathfinder: Wrath I'm very into cock and ball torture I helped put crap in Monomyth
I'm not saying the game is bad (read my long post earlier in the thread). I'm saying this game feels unpolished and incomplete. It's certainly fun to play (so far), with my biggest gripe being not with the mechanics but with UI and art style (not the quality of the execution of the style, the style itself). Gameplay trumps graphics, and gameplay in PP is quite nice, X-Com 1 from firaxis on release level.
 

ArchAngel

Arcane
Joined
Mar 16, 2015
Messages
21,309
The more I play PP, the more glaring is the fact that this is not a finished game, and that people making it don't really care much about it. Compare and contrast to Xenonauts 2, which is not released yet and looks better already.
  • both games have plenty of art that looks placeholder - except X2 is not released yet, and those placeholders are clearly labeled as such
  • both games don't allow you to rebind controls
  • PP gives better indication of whether you're in cover or not, ala nuxcom. In X2 you have to judge this by yourself. imo PP is better in this regard, it's nice QOL.
  • Both games have nice, rotatable 3d maps and soldiers
  • you can't zoom in X2, which is a shame, as the art looks nice (but that prob saves the devs for having to do too much details). You can zoom in PP but why would you, everything is so fucking hideous.
  • PP is nuxcom style AP, X2 is good old ufo:eu style
  • PP displays nicely on the ground how far you can move and still fire, this is a very nice QOL feature that X2 lacks
  • PP also indicates at which enemies you will be able to shoot at from your destination. Another QOL that should be implemented in x2
  • you can deploy way more soldiers in x2, so the whole thing feels more like ufo:eu meat grinder
  • you can move multiple soldiers at a time in x2, while in PP you have to wait for the movement animation to finish before you do anything with another soldier
  • maps in x2 feel much bigger than in pp
  • no direct-fire (VATS-style) in X2
  • in X2 you have your familiar research tree progression, while in PP it seems you're stuck at same level forever, and only get lots new research when you ally with a faction
  • PP aliens are quite original, x2 not so much
So, tl;dr X2 lacks some really nice QOL features, but feels more polished and labour-of-love than PP. PP is more to the riff of nuxcom, while X2 is firmly ufo:eu thing. PP is hidious, X2 looks very nice and stylised. Here's a brief let's play of 1st mission in X2, so you can see some art:
You are wrong in some of these points.
  • both games have plenty of art that looks placeholder - except X2 is not released yet, and those placeholders are clearly labeled as such
It is not placeholder, it is just kind of ugly.

PP is nuxcom style AP, X2 is good old ufo:eu style
Not true. PP uses same system as old UFO, it is just that all actions are put into groups of 25%, 50%, 75% and 100% of your max TU. Old UFO has a bit more variation and you could have 40% and similar kind of actions. I don't see this as a problem, it makes it more usable for new players while still allowing free movement and other stuff.
in X2 you have your familiar research tree progression, while in PP it seems you're stuck at same level forever, and only get lots new research when you ally with a faction
You get some new items that you can research from your own tree like grenades and shotguns. Maybe more later.
 

Trash Player

Augur
Joined
Jun 13, 2015
Messages
495
PP is nuxcom style AP, X2 is good old ufo:eu style
Not true. PP uses same system as old UFO, it is just that all actions are put into groups of 25%, 50%, 75% and 100% of your max TU. Old UFO has a bit more variation and you could have 40% and similar kind of actions. I don't see this as a problem, it makes it more usable for new players while still allowing free movement and other stuff.
This is a very misleading statement. PP has a more fluid action economy than XCOM's essentially move-and-attack one but isn't really a simulationist system like the UFOs and the cargo cults are.
You use superhero powers to gain extra actions and such afterall.
 

ArchAngel

Arcane
Joined
Mar 16, 2015
Messages
21,309
PP is nuxcom style AP, X2 is good old ufo:eu style
Not true. PP uses same system as old UFO, it is just that all actions are put into groups of 25%, 50%, 75% and 100% of your max TU. Old UFO has a bit more variation and you could have 40% and similar kind of actions. I don't see this as a problem, it makes it more usable for new players while still allowing free movement and other stuff.
This is a very misleading statement. PP has a more fluid action economy than XCOM's essentially move-and-attack one but isn't really a simulationist system like the UFOs and the cargo cults are.
You use superhero powers to gain extra actions and such afterall.
Perks that give you abilities on top of everything is another layer and nothing to do with base TU system. Perks also cost Willpower which is a new think in PP (new for both Xcoms).
 

DeepOcean

Arcane
Joined
Nov 8, 2012
Messages
7,404
There are a few things I heard so far that I like, multiple bases, faction choices, enemies just don't wait for you forever, multiple squads per map, you actually need to load ammunition and guns on your dudes, so far, this seems like an attempt of fixing the worst popamole weaknesses of XCOM without completely going 100% homage like Xenonauts. The bad stuff seems like bugs, repetitive maps and lack of content but this can be fixed with time. Seems like a solid base for a decent X-COM clone that after a few patches and the directors cut edition will become decent enough to play.

Yeah, it is a glitchy, bug ridden X-COM clone that will be fixed and seems to be decent enough but what I'm really wanna know is why should I play this? I mean, sure, they took Firaxis XCOM and turn it somewhat less popamole, that is something, but how isn't this just another X-COM clone? Is this just a total conversion mod for XCOM? I mean, I was excited as fuck as I followed this game on the begining, read all the short stories (really well written by the way) and got excited by how they described the thing being a desperate struggle to fight against a Cuthulu alien virus, the game seemed like a horror themed desperate struggle against the unknown.

Last time I was truly terrified with a X-COM game was with Terror from the Deep and I wanted that again, this seemed so cool with enemies coming from the ocean and you having to both defend on land and eventually hit places on the ocean floor with enemies that mutated on a creepy way to match your skills and guns but then things deteriorated and in the end the game looked more and more like a XCOM total conversion . I mean, I know the argument of people that are desperate for more XCOM games but I'm not that impressed after Open X-COM, Xenonauts, Firaxis XCOM and other clones. I expected a X-COM inspired game with something unique not just a total conversion with improved mechanics for Firaxis XCOM.

How is the campaign progression of this game? Does it get anywhere near to what was promised on kickstarter?
 

Grampy_Bone

Arcane
Joined
Jan 25, 2016
Messages
3,944
Location
Wandering the world randomly in search of maps


Dude sounds like a whiner.

Couple valid points--
-Bad tutorial - I agree, the tutorial has you doing dumb things like intentionally taking fire so it can show you how to use med packs.
-Unwinnable missions - agree, this is frustrating and should be fixed
-Crashes and bugs. I haven't seen them but that sucks.

Retarded idiocy:
-My guy got shot and can't fight anymore - welcome to xcom. Don't get shot
-Enemies have mind control - welcome to xcom. kill those guys asap
-Wah my dudes are generic with no tragic backstory or romance options wah wah wah - welcome to xcom, don't get attached to anyone

Potential valid complaints:
-slow animations. Fixable
-Lack of high-end research. He didn't play all the way but it does look like they cut some high end weapons to make them DLC, which is lame

Verdict: git gud, welcome to xcom.
 

ArchAngel

Arcane
Joined
Mar 16, 2015
Messages
21,309
Eh I got into easy raid area for resources mission vs aliens and I lose two guys.. Fucking Crab man showed up with super heavy armor and headcrabs managed to jump on two of my men.
This was a B team and didn't have good items yet. Also the game fucked me with wrong description, I took the perk that says PDW weapons get +20 damage but idiots meant +20%.. so I was surprised that I could not do shit vs 30 armor :(

Now I am switching back to pistols and snipers..
 

geno

Savant
Joined
Aug 21, 2018
Messages
771
Location
Spain
I accidentally discovered a cheap way to earn exp for 1 soldier. If you load a ship just with a vehicle and one unit and you get ambushed while exploring, just enter the vehicle with your unit and finish the mission: my solider gained 4 levels in a single mission with this trick. Probaly it will fixed in the next patch.
 

ArchAngel

Arcane
Joined
Mar 16, 2015
Messages
21,309
I accidentally discovered a cheap way to earn exp for 1 soldier. If you load a ship just with a vehicle and one unit and you get ambushed while exploring, just enter the vehicle with your unit and finish the mission: my solider gained 4 levels in a single mission with this trick. Probaly it will fixed in the next patch.
It is not a bug, since vehicle cannot get XP it gives its XP to other soldiers. So mission XP is shared between 3 guys only.
 

Cyberarmy

Love fool
Patron
Joined
Feb 7, 2013
Messages
8,670
Location
Smyrna - Scalanouva
Divinity: Original Sin 2
This is a fucking proper nu XCom but good lord it also got shitload of problems. Feels unfinished, like most of them KS games...

-Bugs everywhere, seriously. One of my best soldiers got disseapeared while on plane.
-Game looks ugly and non-aesthetic in style, UI is even uglier and a mess.
-No time units :/

I really want to play this but gonna wait for some patches first.
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom