Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

KickStarter Phoenix Point - the new game from X-COM creator Julian Gollop

Alienman

Retro-Fascist
Patron
Joined
Sep 10, 2014
Messages
18,221
Location
Mars
Codex 2016 - The Age of Grimoire Make the Codex Great Again! Grab the Codex by the pussy Codex Year of the Donut Shadorwun: Hong Kong Divinity: Original Sin 2 Steve gets a Kidney but I don't even get a tag.
Mine is "just overwatch"
 

Galdred

Studio Draconis
Patron
Developer
Joined
May 6, 2011
Messages
4,496
Location
Middle Empire
Steve gets a Kidney but I don't even get a tag.
Thinking further about it, the "headshot problem" does seem to be unique to videogames. It's not like you get a lot of headshots IRL, so presumably if the system is set up to be simulationist it's going to mimic that rarity.

How about this: the targeting "circles" wax or wane depending on whether you're aiming for center mass or aiming for an appendage or head? And they wax less the more accuracy you have, and wax least for snipers?

The irony is that shooting IRL has an element of RNG:
Your target may move a little in an unsuspected direction while the bullet travels, and in combat situation, your weapon settings could become a bit off with wear (I once shot a misaligned rifle at a shooting range, and it was really painful...). These elements make shooting at the center of mass much preferable, especially since there is very little chance you won't take the target out of the fight.
The targeting reticle is a relatively elegant way to represent firing at an unmoving target, but it does't really work for moving targets IMO.

The other reason why we have so few headshots IRL is that you usually cannot really take that long to fire your gun (because you want to duck back in cover) in combat, and a torso shot will usually disable the target too.
Infantry combat is seldom troops very far apart taking potshot at each other. It will usually be a platoon in cover suppressing the other, which will call for an artillery strike or something.
I don't think anyone sane will take the time to try to align a machine gunner for a headshot if his position is known.

According to random answer on Quora:
It's difficult to come up with definitive answers, but statistical studies typically come up with 20,000–100,000 rounds expended per casualty caused by a unit
I think these are definitely not people really aiming for headshots(or aiming at all).
 

Jaedar

Arcane
Patron
Joined
Aug 5, 2009
Messages
10,146
Project: Eternity Shadorwun: Hong Kong Divinity: Original Sin 2 Pathfinder: Kingmaker
Mine is "just overwatch"
Overwatch is nice, but against stuff like shieldmen it's usually pointless cause you'll just hit the shield for zero damage, and then their buddies will move after you've expended yourself.

I don't think PP has any trivial golden rule anywhere near "don't trigger multiple pods" in xcom. It's a more well rounded game than that. Maybe "Aim for the weak parts of their limbs"? For the crawlers you need to take out their regen first though or it's pointless. Sniping away arms from the crabmen never gets old though.
 

Galdred

Studio Draconis
Patron
Developer
Joined
May 6, 2011
Messages
4,496
Location
Middle Empire
Steve gets a Kidney but I don't even get a tag.
According to random answer on Quora:
I think these are definitely not people really aiming for headshots(or aiming at all
Can they redo the statistics after removing the Ork dakka counters?

It reminds me of this ending screen:
north_and_south_06.png

Mine is "just overwatch"
Overwatch is nice, but against stuff like shieldmen it's usually pointless cause you'll just hit the shield for zero damage, and then their buddies will move after you've expended yourself.

I don't think PP has any trivial golden rule anywhere near "don't trigger multiple pods" in xcom. It's a more well rounded game than that. Maybe "Aim for the weak parts of their limbs"? For the crawlers you need to take out their regen first though or it's pointless. Sniping away arms from the crabmen never gets old though.

Doesn't overwatch go against the whole select body part to shoot at?
 

ArchAngel

Arcane
Joined
Mar 16, 2015
Messages
21,299


https://www.pcgamesn.com/phoenix-point/dlc-4-acheron-first-look

Phoenix Point’s Corrupted Horizons DLC adds the bioengineered Acheron creature
phoenix-point-acheron-corrupted-horizons-580x334.jpg



Phoenix Point’s next DLC, Corrupted Horizons, is due out in October, and it’s adding some game-changing new units to the XCOM-style strategy game. We’ve gotten a first look at one of them, the Acheron, and it’s another mean-looking Pandoran threat that’s going to force you to reconsider your tactics on the battlefield.

Acherons are large, four-legged creatures that have been developed by one of Phoenix Point’s human factions – although exactly which one is responsible for the monstrosity is unclear. Whatever its provenance, the Acheron is a heavy-duty support unit that can not only call in Pandoran reinforcements, it can also reanimate dead Pandoran units you’ve already dealt with.

The Acheron’s main role, however, ties into a new game mechanic Corrupted Horizons will be introducing to Phoenix Point. The creatures can spread corruption, a miasma that saps soldiers of their will to continue the fight. You’ll have to capture and research an Acheron as part of the fourth DLC’s story arc in order to uncover the means to fight back against corruption – but even when you do, it’ll still present a threat during battle.


Snapshot Games tells us that the Acheron’s design was inspired by the alien harvesters featured in H.G. Wells’ War of the Worlds.



“While the big factions (Phoenix, New Jericho, Synedrion, and the Disciples of Anu) aim to restore the world and save humanity in their own way, there are a lot of smaller factions with other motives,” the developers tell us. “The Pure and the creators of the Acheron are examples of such factions, and the Acheron is an example of what happens when things go wrong.”

Have a peek at how things have gone wrong in the trailer:

The Acheron will be a menace when you end up facing it in tactical battles – it can leap across the map, spread corruption, and release pepper clouds that reduce the accuracy of your weapons. It can also heal allies and, as mentioned before, resurrect corpses and call for backup.

You’ll be able to set your sights on the Acheron when the Corrupted Horizons DLC launches October 1. There’s more coming with the DLC, too – including a new soldier type that Snapshot Games hasn’t yet revealed.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

ArchAngel

Arcane
Joined
Mar 16, 2015
Messages
21,299
lol 1 new enemy with prexisting mechanics counts as "dlc":lol::lol::lol:
New enemy has almost zero preexisting mechanics. It has a bunch of new ones. They probably went a bit overboard and gave him too many new mechanics all put into one enemy.
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom