Is Baldur's Gate 3 actually bad gameplay-wise? I haven't paid any attention to it and only know about the bear memes.
Is it hated because it's mainstream? Because it's shallow/dumbed down? Because it has nothing to do with the first two? Because it's woke? Because it's not made in some former soviet shithole? All of the above?
No, it's not bad gameplay-wise; it's the best RPG ever made, non-ironically. It has the highest production value ever seen in every single aspect, with a lot of care in details and
never-before-seen reactivity.
I get that you like fully mocapped and voiced bear sex, it is indeed a high production value game, but why are you retards still lying about the reactivity thing? I understood why people were buying into the hype and spamming this shit before the game was actually released, since the EA was giving a good illusion of many paths being possible, but now after it was proven 1000 times that it all ends up in the same, one linear path, with very minor, mostly flavour changes depending on your choices, why do you still repeat that bullshit claim? The game has less reactivity than even small budget RPGs like Wrathfinder, or decades old Fallout/Arcanum, and there is absolutely nothing "never seen before" there. In terms of reactivity it's Pillars tier, that's it.
You love BG3, cool, not everyone can have a good taste, but at least praise the things that are actually in the game, instead of just making shit up.