FeelTheRads
Arcane
- Joined
- Apr 18, 2008
- Messages
- 13,716
The Codexer is not a learning animal. If you think that they will deliver another complex cRPG, you are deluding yourself.
You always need to have something to hope for, no?
The Codexer is not a learning animal. If you think that they will deliver another complex cRPG, you are deluding yourself.
The Codexer is not a learning animal. If you think that they will deliver another complex cRPG, you are deluding yourself.
You always need to have something to hope for, no?
Yes, Obsidian are complete shit and have gone downhill.The Codexer is not a learning animal. If you think that they will deliver another complex cRPG, you are deluding yourself.
The Codexer is not a learning animal. If you think that they will deliver another complex cRPG, you are deluding yourself.
You always need to have something to hope for, no?
Hyping and celebrity worshiping are useless mental disorders. Instead of being emotional and anxious while you are waiting for the game, and grasping every single sentence out of context to feel hope that you will have other decent cRPGs to play, you can play other decent cRPGs, make a book about cRPGs, make a cRPG, read books, watch movies, learn a new language, get laid, drink wine, play some sports, make a garden, paint a picture, write a novel, throw a party and dance, learn how to play a guitar, build a bridge, save lives, etc.
Or, you can simply shitpost with jihadic fever about how all the AA-devs are sellouts.The Codexer is not a learning animal. If you think that they will deliver another complex cRPG, you are deluding yourself.
You always need to have something to hope for, no?
Hyping and celebrity worshiping are useless mental disorders. Instead of being emotional and anxious while you are waiting for the game, and grasping every single sentence out of context to feel hope that you will have other decent cRPGs to play, you can play other decent cRPGs, make a book about cRPGs, make a cRPG, read books, watch movies, learn a new language, get laid, drink wine, play some sports, make a garden, paint a picture, write a novel, throw a party and dance, learn how to play a guitar, build a bridge, save lives, etc.
The Codexer is not a learning animal. If you think that they will deliver another complex cRPG, you are deluding yourself.
You always need to have something to hope for, no?
Hyping and celebrity worshiping are useless mental disorders. Instead of being emotional and anxious while you are waiting for the game, and grasping every single sentence out of context to feel hope that you will have other decent cRPGs to play, you can play other decent cRPGs, make a book about cRPGs, make a cRPG, read books, watch movies, learn a new language, get laid, drink wine, play some sports, make a garden, paint a picture, write a novel, throw a party and dance, learn how to play a guitar, build a bridge, save lives, etc.
Shitposting about games is one thing, saving lives is another. I would never give up the former for the latter.
While it does reveal tiny bits of new information, this QA session failed to engage Leonard, to get him to express himself freely and really discuss subjects broadly, give his point of view on things, etc. He only strictly answers the question and then nothing else. Feels very forced, like he just wanted to get this over with.
It's certainly much less than what I had hoped for after the previous one.
We already know that this UE4 project is a console game, and "console" and "complex" are antonyms. They were doing console-oriented games for more than a decade, and in the end, PC gamers had to dig them out of the financial grave via Kickstarter and online projects. How does the gratitude look like?The Codexer is not a learning animal. If you think that they will deliver another complex cRPG, you are deluding yourself.
Hyping and celebrity worshiping are useless mental disorders*. Instead of being emotional and anxious while you are waiting for the game, and grasping every single sentence out of context to feel hope that you will have other decent cRPGs to play, you can play other decent cRPGs, make a book about cRPGs, make a cRPG, read books, watch movies, learn a new language, get laid, drink wine, play some sports, make a garden, paint a picture, write a novel, throw a party and dance, learn how to play a guitar, build a bridge, save lives, etc.
Well, we had our version internally, but it's WW's IP, so they get to decide what is canon. I'd like to think that everyone is free to make their own decision about whether it was Caine or not. I personally believe it was Tim Cain, but that's just me.
I have no idea what you possibly could be referring to.
Great interview.
I'm kinda puzzled by that piece of Fallout art tho. I really love it and thought it was one of the more best ads done by the team, but that isn't true, apparently. I wonder who actually made that.
So basically a Fallout game with a camera like in Dragon Age: Origins. That would be really cool, I'd love to play a game like that.Leonard Boyarsky said:I would want first or third person exploration with the camera zooming out to a more tactical viewpoint for combat.
Not really, because Bethesda's garbage doesn't have a tactical view or tactical combat. I am sure that a Boyarsky/Cain Fallout 3 would have been quite different from what gave us.Bethesda is finally avenged. When they said they did Fallout as the original developers intended if it weren't for the technological limitations they knew what they were talking about.
Keep in mind, that's only if they have to go for turn-based. He doesn't seem to care otherwise. He's not a systems guy, as he admits.So basically a Fallout game with a camera like in Dragon Age: Origins. That would be really cool, I'd love to play a game like that.