So he wants to tell his emotional stories without all that gameplay nonsense. Go work for Telltale then.
RPG already evolved wrongly,we have Fallout 4!Everybody here is thinking about RPGs evolving but nobody is thinking: What if RPGs evolve wrong?
Guy who made a pretty Ass Burgers RPG wants to suddenly change everything. Good. He should of done that in the first place. I'd agree with Sawyers sentiments if he wasn't both a raging hypocrite and gave Skyrim of all things as an inspiration for change. Nah, RPGs offer an amazing opportunity for immersive gameplay. You can use the systems in that game to define the type of experience you want. Look at games like Deus Ex, V:tM:B or at least the idea behind Alpha Protocol if not the execution. Hell, just make a traditional infinity engine style RPG where your characters skills and talents actually matter and can dynamically affect the story.( basically the core tenant behind my hypothetical infinity engine inspired Star Trek RPG) making non combat classes and skills actually a viable option to complete the game would be a nice start.
That video...
Any more if this kind of stuff??
They could be if they actually provided reactivity instead of railroading you into the same result.ITT we have people basically arguing that Telltale games are rpgs.
FWIW Polish article by a journalist who apparently also attended the panel: https://www.gram.pl/news/2018/04/21...sie-radykalnie-ale-gracze-tego-nie-chca.shtml
Sure he was there? Seems like this is just repeating what VG247 quoted.
To me evolving means improving and iterating, something that modern developers rarely do. Case in point, pre buffing in the IE games was a little bit of a chore, but a logical and effective tool in your arsenal, so Obsidian decided that rather than improve a flawed system they'd simply remove it cause its too much work, and everybody cheered and said yay less features.
Would love to hear how one would solve the "flawed system" of pre-buffing, because that shit is not an strategic aspect of the game, just a thing you cross from a list when you want to fight
When a business starts referring to its base customer base as "resistant to change" it means that it has grown sulky over what it feels is customer ingratitude for its efforts on their behalf, aka it's on a fast track to going out of business.
Actually this is first time it has become in sync with their opinions.I'm not sure that Josh Sawyer's off-the-cuff remark represents the opinions of the Obsidian Entertainment management, really
Before my current gig, I spent years as an attorney in private practice, with scores of business clients from sole proprietors to mega-corporations. Let me pass along one piece of wisdom I picked up from that experience:
When a business starts referring to its base customer base as "resistant to change" it means that it has grown sulky over what it feels is customer ingratitude for its efforts on their behalf, aka it's on a fast track to going out of business.
I'm not sure that Josh Sawyer's off-the-cuff remark represents the opinions of the Obsidian Entertainment management, really
When a business starts referring to its base customer base as "resistant to change" it means that it has grown sulky over what it feels is customer ingratitude for its efforts on their behalf, aka it's on a fast track to going out of business.
http://www.rpgcodex.net/forums/index.php?threads/glassdoor-reviews.121494/I don't know about going out of business, but yes, referring to your customers as "resistant to change" implies way too much self-importance and for me it's a sign to stay clear away of such a company.
You are new here.. any news about Obsidian and connected with POE is enough for us to start losing our minds about itI'm not sure that Josh Sawyer's off-the-cuff remark represents the opinions of the Obsidian Entertainment management, really
Honestly this entire thread's existence is weird, lots of people seriously posting over a couple generic remarks in a developer event, posters losing their minds about Sawyer giving Bethesda/Skyrim as an example even thought he probably chose that because everyone fucking knows about the game and some people/media could be confused if he used some other less relevant game
If I was in more of a trolling mood I'd have responded to people saying "why mention Elder Scrolls and not Age Of Decadence or Tides Of Numenera" with "probably because he'd have had to spend extra time explaining to the audience what they were"I'm not sure that Josh Sawyer's off-the-cuff remark represents the opinions of the Obsidian Entertainment management, really
Honestly this entire thread's existence is weird, lots of people seriously posting over a couple generic remarks in a developer event, posters losing their minds about Sawyer giving Bethesda/Skyrim as an example even thought he probably chose that because everyone fucking knows about the game and some people/media could be confused if he used some other less relevant game
What is weird is how fanboys can make the reality warp around them and completely ignore the most obviou facts with a sraight face.Honestly this entire thread's existence is weird, lots of people seriously posting over a couple generic remarks in a developer event, posters losing their minds about Sawyer giving Bethesda/Skyrim as an example even thought he probably chose that because everyone fucking knows about the game and some people/media could be confused if he used some other less relevant game