Silverfish
Arbiter
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2019
- Messages
- 3,871
Todd Howard, the Steve Jobs of Gaming?
Except Todd is still alive. Who's laughing now?
Todd Howard, the Steve Jobs of Gaming?
They kicked their own community to the curb.
Bethesda forums, which I had been an active member on since Morrowind
Starfield I can feasibly comprehend, but how the fuck are you going to get even 200 hours out of an open world with a few sidequests here and there and a linear story? I know there are a gorillion ways you can complete the main quest in BG3, but it's still a run of the mill main quest with stages. There's no way you can get 200 hours out of BG3, unless you beta test the game for 2 years and do a playthrough every update, like me.Starfield and Baldur's Gate 3 have reignited the 'quantity vs quality' debate around RPGs that promise a billion hours of gameplay, but I think they can actually deliver:
https://www.pcgamer.com/starfield-a...meplay-but-i-think-they-can-actually-deliver/
No, this is about Bethesda not giving a fuck anymore.They kicked their own community to the curb.
Bethesda forums, which I had been an active member on since Morrowind
I see what this is all about now. You got End of Rhined by Todd.
Keep thinking mobile is decline while those guys are learning from all the hybridized PCconsole mishap mistakes, smells
Good. Talk to real people.About the romance options, the way Todd describe it sounds like that four people are the only ones having quest line(along with romance). So bascially there are only four companions(WTF Todd), the rest are just crews.
Real people are fucking boring.Good. Talk to real people.About the romance options, the way Todd describe it sounds like that four people are the only ones having quest line(along with romance). So bascially there are only four companions(WTF Todd), the rest are just crews.
You're right.Real people are fucking boring.Good. Talk to real people.
I'd rather have four companions that are actually worth using, than 10+ that are fucking shitAbout the romance options, the way Todd describe it sounds like that four people are the only ones having quest line(along with romance). So bascially there are only four companions(WTF Todd), the rest are just crews.
This. If their questlines are actually good and flesh them out this should be plenty. I still remember Nick Valentine's and that redhead crackwhore's questlines in FO4 which were nice.I'd rather have four companions that are actually worth using, than 10+ that are fucking shit
and that redhead crackwhore's questlines in FO4 which were nice.
I got well over 300+ hours from PF WotR from doing a completionist run. Especially if you take time during the combats, inventory management, exploring every nook and granny, er I mean cranny, etc.Starfield I can feasibly comprehend, but how the fuck are you going to get even 200 hours out of an open world with a few sidequests here and there and a linear story? I know there are a gorillion ways you can complete the main quest in BG3, but it's still a run of the mill main quest with stages. There's no way you can get 200 hours out of BG3, unless you beta test the game for 2 years and do a playthrough every update, like me.Starfield and Baldur's Gate 3 have reignited the 'quantity vs quality' debate around RPGs that promise a billion hours of gameplay, but I think they can actually deliver:
https://www.pcgamer.com/starfield-a...meplay-but-i-think-they-can-actually-deliver/
Again none of the companion in Fallout 4 has a "quest line", so Bethesda needs to step up their game big time here.
Again none of the companion in Fallout 4 has a "quest line", so Bethesda needs to step up their game big time here.
Huh?
They have personal quest at best, none of them have a quest "line".Again none of the companion in Fallout 4 has a "quest line", so Bethesda needs to step up their game big time here.
Huh?
They have personal quest at best, none of them have a quest "line".Again none of the companion in Fallout 4 has a "quest line", so Bethesda needs to step up their game big time here.
Huh?