You will own nothing and you will be happy, goy.This right here's precisely the sort of attitude that got us into this shit where we no longer "purchase" a copy of a software package for own use, but instead "license" it at the provider's whims and when stuff changes under our ass, we're "not even forced to use it, bro."
You have the right to use an old OS, but you don't have the right to force third-party vendors to continue to support it indefinitely.I don't expect Microsoft to keep giving me free updates past its lifecycle, but I also don't want some mandatory update to turn into something other than what it was when I paid for it.
To extrapolate from that, I don't expect Newell to keep supporting our continued business on a deprecated OS outside of his company's control, but I would want him to supply a technical solution for users to retain access to the products he's already sold them such as they were at the time he sold them. For instance in this case, some barebones Windows 7 client that'd just allow the games to run. No cloud features, no updates, just here it is, either let users download or backup their products and then run them.
More generally, the point is that all notions of ownership, consumer protection and fair business practices are being eroded at an alarming rate in this magnificent modern world of ours, and everything IT-related is leading the fucking charge. If our lawmakers had the slightest bit of backbone and inclination towards the public interest, mandatory updates would be out the fucking window and providers would have to supply customers with the ability to retain personal use copies of their existing software if the provider discontinued support or (this being another can of worms in dire need of attention) chose to update their terms post-acquisition.
Sure, sure. Just like it's private companies' business what they're doing with their platforms. And the vaccination was completely voluntary and no one was coerced to take it.This right here's precisely the sort of attitude that got us into this shit where we no longer "purchase" a copy of a software package for own use, but instead "license" it at the provider's whims and when stuff changes under our ass, we're "not even forced to use it, bro."
You have the right to use an old OS, but you don't have the right to force third-party vendors to continue to support it indefinitely.
Same principle.
If you look into disabling bloatware and telemetry for Win10/11 on YouTube, you'll see a lot of people linking to a fairly common tool that does much of it for you.I would welcome suggestions/links for an easy way to do that kind of "surgery"
So far I've disabled things that were easy to disable
So just like what Nintendo did with the DS and the 3DS by shutting down the E-Shop?Waiting for the moment when they decide Steam Deck 1 won't work anymore and you have to buy the new one to keep playing the games you bought.
People buy old games on Steam?People who say 'zumg no one has the obligation to support ur windows 95 forever' don't see the real issue here. It's obviously true that software which is still in use doesn't need to stay compatible with old shit, but do you really see no problem in how you'll now be forced to update your windows to play, say, Max Payne and Dark Forces?
Bonus points if a large number of those old games sold by Steam stop working on W10+.
We're finally getting caught up with what most people were saying 15 years ago. That Steam can potentially fuck with you at whatever stage and bar you from your games library that you put lots of cash into, and you'll be able to do nothing about it.
Waiting for the moment when they decide Steam Deck 1 won't work anymore and you have to buy the new one to keep playing the games you bought.
People buy old games on Steam?People who say 'zumg no one has the obligation to support ur windows 95 forever' don't see the real issue here. It's obviously true that software which is still in use doesn't need to stay compatible with old shit, but do you really see no problem in how you'll now be forced to update your windows to play, say, Max Payne and Dark Forces?
Bonus points if a large number of those old games sold by Steam stop working on W10+.
We're finally getting caught up with what most people were saying 15 years ago. That Steam can potentially fuck with you at whatever stage and bar you from your games library that you put lots of cash into, and you'll be able to do nothing about it.
Guys, Steam is for buying stuff which isn't available on GOG or is super-cheap on a sale (or some games to play online, which have bigger community than on GOG).
You should already own an old pirated copy translated by Ruskies, with such lines as "twoje wrogi znikli w cieniu".People buy old games on Steam?People who say 'zumg no one has the obligation to support ur windows 95 forever' don't see the real issue here. It's obviously true that software which is still in use doesn't need to stay compatible with old shit, but do you really see no problem in how you'll now be forced to update your windows to play, say, Max Payne and Dark Forces?
Bonus points if a large number of those old games sold by Steam stop working on W10+.
We're finally getting caught up with what most people were saying 15 years ago. That Steam can potentially fuck with you at whatever stage and bar you from your games library that you put lots of cash into, and you'll be able to do nothing about it.
Guys, Steam is for buying stuff which isn't available on GOG or is super-cheap on a sale (or some games to play online, which have bigger community than on GOG).
then find me max payne on zog, asshole
also once again missing the point
Altered to represent truth. Having said that, I acknowledge the fact that Windows itself can also be considered as being malicious software.As it turns out, the licensing concept is crap. And pirates are the ones who actually preserve games for future generations, removing DRM and just giving you the software with a bit of extra, such as undetectable malicious software.
It depends. If you pirate everything, including games that do not benefit capitalists (or any other greedy bastard), you are part of the problemn.Piracy is good.
Amen brother then we will take down the biggest parasites of them all landlords.Piracy is good.
Liberate software from the capitalist distribution monopoly enforcing scum! The robbers of the intellectual labor. The parasite lawyers and the shop keepers.
Amen brother then we will take down the biggest parasites of them all landlords.Piracy is good.
Liberate software from the capitalist distribution monopoly enforcing scum! The robbers of the intellectual labor. The parasite lawyers and the shop keepers.
I'm an indie author and may or may not have contributed work to undisclosed indie video games made by tiny teams of fewer than 10 people, and I fully support people pirating my shit.It depends. If you pirate everything, including games that do not benefit capitalists (or any other greedy bastard), you are part of the problemn.
You should do this regardless of Gates. Why pay +$100 when you can get it for 20-30 bucks.If you don't wanna give Gates your money, get a key from a key reseller and just nab the ISO file from the Microsoft site lmao