juggernaut
Educated
I can't believe none of you care about super weapons. Planet-killing, star-killing super weapons! Instead you go for +1 missiles +1 engines
To make the choices a little bit more genuine.
Barb, when you post the next update with Choices, post the rough outcomes on pastebin.com. It shows the date you posted it.
Include the link in your update but leave 2 or 3 characters out of it. This "pastebin.com/SUSNU8kM" will then look like that "pastebin.com/SUSNU***".
That way you cant change the outcomes because you already posted the link and the characters are random so you wont be able to prepare a few different pastebins.
We cant read it because we dont know the missing numbers. I guess , I could bruteforce pastebin but that would take way to much time to filter out the one with the space opera choices.
Its a my trust issues. You can flip flop after the voting. You can shift the outcome to be more fun for you or some other reason. Basically its the same problem I raised earlier.
But the majority trusts you and its cool. Its enjoyable.
The Barbarian said:The decades following the Phyr War were, in many ways, unkind to Codexia. Though it had been victorious - and decisively so - a serious, underlying socio-economic malaise threatened future Codexian development, and rendered the state itself a tottering, decrepit institution.
Radisshu said:The Barbarian said:The decades following the Phyr War were, in many ways, unkind to Codexia. Though it had been victorious - and decisively so - a serious, underlying socio-economic malaise threatened future Codexian development, and rendered the state itself a tottering, decrepit institution.
See? You should have listened to me.
Now I vote B, our economy needs it badly, as does our stability in general.
treave said:Radisshu said:The Barbarian said:The decades following the Phyr War were, in many ways, unkind to Codexia. Though it had been victorious - and decisively so - a serious, underlying socio-economic malaise threatened future Codexian development, and rendered the state itself a tottering, decrepit institution.
See? You should have listened to me.
Now I vote B, our economy needs it badly, as does our stability in general.
Gee, I wonder who voted to take in the Phyrries which was the initial cause of our recession...
You lack
Jack said:Taking refugees would be bad for our economy.
Radisshu said:treave said:Radisshu said:The Barbarian said:The decades following the Phyr War were, in many ways, unkind to Codexia. Though it had been victorious - and decisively so - a serious, underlying socio-economic malaise threatened future Codexian development, and rendered the state itself a tottering, decrepit institution.
See? You should have listened to me.
Now I vote B, our economy needs it badly, as does our stability in general.
Gee, I wonder who voted to take in the Phyrries which was the initial cause of our recession...
You lack
Yeah, and maybe we could've used those phyrries as I proposed, to begin with, if we hadn't pretended we never took them in in the first place and instead would have fixed our destabilized state.
This is not a game of Starcraft, we cannot support hyper-advanced technology on nothing.
treave said:TheWE REQUIRE MORE MINERALS argument. Nice one. <-- no sarcasm meant. <-- just in case more butthurt is generated.
One world.juggernaut said:Yeah ok, I admit my previous decision to go for the super weapon wasn't really serious, I don't think we're in a position right now to prioritize it. But I hope at some point we are!
As much as it hurts, I'm changing my vote - to AI. There are strong points in favour of the unobtainium but I think the riskier option will really pay off in this instance, for both technology and economy.
I'll edit my previous post to minimize confusion