toroid
Arcane
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2005
- Messages
- 711
I mostly get Dark Souls 1's lore, I think. I thought DS1's lore was very skillfully handled. It was encrypted and concealed in a way that was conducive to being logically decoded and comprehended if you seriously give your attention to reading item descriptions and listening to the dialogue, and then put some thought into how all of that information should tie together. You need to fill in the blanks in a lot of cases. If you're expecting the lore to be simply handed to you in bite-size pieces then you'll definitely be left wondering why you're not being fed. There are a lot of youtube videos focused on interpreting the lore in DS1, the conclusions they reach are usually very logical. Example
- Does anyone actually get DS lore? I played DaS and DS2. For me, it's totally surreal world, I don't get ANYTHING that's happening in it.
Dark Souls 2, on the other hand, seems more derivative, lazy and unoriginal. There is a lot of material that is literally copied from Dark Souls 1 and pasted into Dark Souls 2. This may indicate that Drangleic is Lordran.. or it may indicate developer laziness. Dunno really, I keep getting thrown off by how sloppy and unpolished the lore of DS2 is. Or maybe I just haven't fully pieced it together yet.