Ghost of Tsushima is not a Japanese game. Why would they care about its success? Also the time and setting are politically sensitive there.Yakuza style games might develop further and shed their rpg elements in favor of open world GTA style games with the success of Ghost of Tsushima, but that is rather unlikely, as the newest Yakuza will be a turn based rpg.
Ghost of Tsushima is not a Japanese game. Why would they care about its success? Also the time and setting are politically sensitive there.
Let's not forget they went through the trouble to hire a few Japanologists to ensure that the dialogue is period-accurate, including using kanji that were used back then, but are unfamiliar now. Also words and grammar constructions that were used then, but are no longer in use and can be difficult to understand for modern Japanese ears. This means for Japanese nerds it is as if we got a period-accurate medieval times game.
What happens if you play a game with a party of 6 characters (let's say Kingmaker), but you install a mod to play with 12 characters?4 characters? RPG. 6 characters? RPG. 8 characters? Yeah that's still an RPG. 10 characters? Now we're stretching it but it still qualifies. Anything more than 10? LOLNO now it's a strategy or tactics game LMAO.
Games like Final Fantasy Tactics, Fire Emblem, Shining Force, Vandal Hearts, Langrisser, are called tactical RPG, JA2 it seems to fit in that category for what I've seen.
My gut feeling says that RPGs usually don't go above 28 party members. Any more than that and it starts to feel like a strategy game.What happens if you play a game with a party of 6 characters (let's say Kingmaker), but you install a mod to play with 12 characters?4 characters? RPG. 6 characters? RPG. 8 characters? Yeah that's still an RPG. 10 characters? Now we're stretching it but it still qualifies. Anything more than 10? LOLNO now it's a strategy or tactics game LMAO.
That likely wouldn't be your problem if you're playing it for the first time. Needs a certain room type (additionally, most of the world map is wilderness with no buildings, and not all fights can be taken into urban areas), if you don't know where to lure-shoot you might deprive yourself of interrupt chance, and you're most likely to want to use this when trying to tackle a large/elite enemy group with only a few mercs. If done with newbie mercs (i.e the RPG way of getting a cheap team and watching them get stronger over the course of the game) you also risk an experienced enemy walking in and emptying his clip on your mercs at point-blank range before anyone reacts, too. Still easy once you figure the AI out, but in urban areas it's much easier (and actually enjoyable) to instead climb onto the nearest flat roof and snipe from there, night ops = easy mode, if you're near sector's border you can perorm an enter-leave dance, and if you're going to use savescumming to figure out how to reliably use exploits you may as well just savescum hit chance rolls (i.e. try ironman if you don't even trust yourself).Is that true? You can do that in Desperados and it's really hard to resist. Basically broke the game for me. I'd like to get into JA2, but this news makes it less likely.
Who cares? If you don't care, then why did you bring them up? Rather than contorting yourself through these extreme mental gymnastics (how on earth is FTL an RPG), maybe you should just admit you don't like RPGs all that much?On the other hand, I would say that the best CRPGs to come out of Kickstarter are Shadowrun Returns: Dragonfall, Banner Saga and FTL, all smaller budget games with tight, manageable scopes, clarity of purpose and restrained ambition. Of course, one could make a very good case that they don't have sufficient CRPG credentials to even be CRPGs, but that's kind of my point; who cares whether they adhere to genre archetypes, when they end up being better games than the ones that did?
I don't even disagree with the idea that narrowing down your scope can produce a higher quality game, but it's not as simple as 'let's remove as many RPG elements/game mechanics as we can'.
Who cares? If you don't care, then why did you bring them up? Rather than contorting yourself through these extreme mental gymnastics (how on earth is FTL an RPG), maybe you should just admit you don't like RPGs all that much?On the other hand, I would say that the best CRPGs to come out of Kickstarter are Shadowrun Returns: Dragonfall, Banner Saga and FTL, all smaller budget games with tight, manageable scopes, clarity of purpose and restrained ambition. Of course, one could make a very good case that they don't have sufficient CRPG credentials to even be CRPGs, but that's kind of my point; who cares whether they adhere to genre archetypes, when they end up being better games than the ones that did?
So according to you, the fact that a bulk of CRPG discussion is centered around games from the 90's (and early 2000's, to be more precise) is 'proof' that there's something wrong with the genre itself? But not the fact that, with the exception of BioWare and Bethesda, every CRPG developer closed their doors in the late 90's or early 2000's? You're acting like we've been drowning in hundreds of CRPGs since the 90's, when you could basically count the number of CRPGs released in the decade prior to the Kickstarter renaissance on one hand.That's a matter of perspective. I like pen and paper RPGs this much, and on the computer side of things, I'm very fond of dungeon crawlers, tactical RPGs of every stripe (ones with underwhelming RPG elements are fine), dungeon crawlers, strategy games with RPG elements, various jRPGs, Dark Souls and whatever King of Dragon Pass is. As far as what people generally refer to as "CRPG", no other letters included, I'm more than happy to admit that there isn't a single game strictly belonging to that subgenre made after the 90s that I would consider great, but that seems to be par for the course on the Codex, don't you think? There are plenty of games I do like, so the issue isn't that I don't like CRPGs; the issue is that people who like CRPGs don't seem to like CRPGs, and hence it is my impression that there's something wrong with the genre itself.
The only aspect of FTL that has some commonality with an RPG is the racial differences and the Dungeon Master-esque way in which crew members improve their skills, but even that is minor in the grand scheme of things. Even if you max the weapons system skill, you recharge weapons what, maybe 10% faster? It's more like a little reward for holding on to the same crew members as long as possible rather than a real character building system.Now, as far as FTL goes, the only way in which it isn't an RPG is that there's something else it's easier to identify as, specifically, a "spaceship rogue-lite". But that basically means that its mechanics are largely the mechanics of a computer RPG, with the distinction that instead of developing a single character or party, you're developing a spaceship and its crew.
What could RPG developers learn from FTL?Basically, I think that FTL is relevant to a discussion of RPGs, and there's much about its design that's worthy of consideration.
I don't see how the legitimate issues I raised about Dragonfall and Banner Saga could be construed as 'bemoaning'.In the here and now, though, I do think that making more specialised games is, in fact, the likely way forward for CRPGs, and it is a mistake to automatically bemoan that as dumbing down.
It's not a mod. It's just changing one or two lines in the game's AI file. And it makes a huge difference in the game's challenge. Basically HBS thought the game was too hard for popamole gamers so they modded it at the last moment, which broke the game's AI scripts.Which leaves Dragonfall. Which is an RPG, but it also contradicts the point you're trying to make. Dragonfall certainly has a narrow scope, consisting of a series of discrete missions in lieu of being able to explore freely. That's fine, but the problem is that Dragonfall fails at the things you'd think it would excel at due to narrowing down its scope. Resource management is non-existent. Your abilities are all on cooldowns, having effectively limtless uses, while items also have effectively limitless uses, since they are replenished between missions and sometimes even mid-mission.
Challenge? A cakewalk, since enemies in Dragonfall are hard-coded to never attack more than once per turn, while your characters can attack 3+ times per turn. You have to use a mod to remove this artificial limitation.
Deadfire requires you to pay your ship's crew iircSide question: what are all the RPGs besides JA2 and Battle Bros where you hire mercenaries but you have to pay them continuously? I don't even know if that's a hard and fast rule in those games, but that's why I haven't played them yet.
If I had to choose between JA2 existing or clear genre boundaries, I would choose JA2 every time.
You can have both, as JA2 neatly fits within clear RPG boundaries. The only consistent argument against it has always been "but but its combat doesn't suck, how could it be an RPG?"
For some unfathomable reason, an RPG suddenly stops being an RPG if your party size exceeds a certain arbitrary number.
4 characters? RPG. 6 characters? RPG. 8 characters? Yeah that's still an RPG. 10 characters? Now we're stretching it but it still qualifies. Anything more than 10? LOLNO now it's a strategy or tactics game LMAO.
That's literally the argument some people used here. JA2 has RPG-style characters and stats, but you control too many at once!
Battle Brothers would be a roguelike-ish RPG but you have up to 16 mercs in your party instead of just 6 or 8 so it's not!
They're not RPGs (even though their rulesets are pure fucking RPG and if your party size were smaller, nobody would even remotely doubt their RPG credentials), they're strategy games!!
Imagine inviting a few too many people to your D&D session. You all thought you were going to play an RPG, but it suddenly turned into a wargame. Oops.
Side question: what are all the RPGs besides JA2 and Battle Bros where you hire mercenaries but you have to pay them continuously? I don't even know if that's a hard and fast rule in those games, but that's why I haven't played them yet.
Side question: what are all the RPGs besides JA2 and Battle Bros where you hire mercenaries but you have to pay them continuously? I don't even know if that's a hard and fast rule in those games, but that's why I haven't played them yet.
Syndicate, Fallout Tactics, Freedom Force
HoMM 2/HoMM 3, kek.Side question: what are all the RPGs besides JA2 and Battle Bros where you hire mercenaries but you have to pay them continuously? I don't even know if that's a hard and fast rule in those games, but that's why I haven't played them yet.
I also remember playing it ages ago but I remember that at least in the second games there were some heroes you didn't automatically get and had to buy with prestige points. I think Man'O'War was one of them.Syndicate, Fallout Tactics, Freedom Force
Really, Freedom Force? I played FF2 forever ago and don't remember that.