The optimization is abysmal.
http://www.pcgameshardware.de/The-Witcher-3-PC-237266/Specials/Grafikkarten-Benchmarks-1159196/
Even a titan x struggles with ultra settings to geat near 60...
A 970 barely gets 40 fps with those ugly ass graphics ,are you fucking kidding me?
Yhea buy NVIDIA cards to get shit performance,that's one way to advertise your shitty ass game...
The optimization is abysmal.
http://www.pcgameshardware.de/The-Witcher-3-PC-237266/Specials/Grafikkarten-Benchmarks-1159196/
Even a titan x struggles with ultra settings to geat near 60...
A 970 barely gets 40 fps with those ugly ass graphics ,are you fucking kidding me?
Yhea buy NVIDIA cards to get shit performance,that's one way to advertise your shitty ass game...
Imagine Deus Ex with combat XP. Or giving even more XP for certain approach to combat.
- No XP for combat
Is Josh Sawyer working for CDP? What is this no XP for combat nonsense nowdays? Imagine fallout or bg 1 without xp for combat.
I remember them saying that it took 20 mins to get from east-west on a horsie, unless something changed.I've already posted videos about TW3, but basically you can go almost everywhere on horse, and it'd take you close to 40 minutes of real time to cover the map from north to south or east-west, or something.
You could also travel on boat to Skellige but it'd be too long and that's why there's fast travel.
there you go!Star WarsJedi AcademyMovie Battles 2 is still the game with best real time action combat combined with cool powers usage. Why cannot witcher just c/p that combat? They even got jedi like signs for witchers.
I never really bothered to care for the graphics and what not before but, I'll be able to run it if I ran the second on max just fine right?
You can find the benchmark with the hairworks off lower on the page and the performance is still abysmal...The optimization is abysmal.
http://www.pcgameshardware.de/The-Witcher-3-PC-237266/Specials/Grafikkarten-Benchmarks-1159196/
Even a titan x struggles with ultra settings to geat near 60...
A 970 barely gets 40 fps with those ugly ass graphics ,are you fucking kidding me?
Yhea buy NVIDIA cards to get shit performance,that's one way to advertise your shitty ass game...
This test is with hairworks i believe. Hairworks cuts framerate like motherfucker regardless of GPU.
People been playin' TW3 on Ultra locked 60 with single 980 when hairworks was off.
Do we get STD from combat, instead?The lack of xp from combat is replaced by xp from banging whores.
- No XP for combat
- world design inspired by gothic 1/2
You got to be fucking kidding me. This does not compute. Btw you want to tell me I got to go through all this shit combat and I want even be rewarded? This is god damn retarded game design.
No.- No XP for combat
- world design inspired by gothic 1/2
You got to be fucking kidding me. This does not compute. Btw you want to tell me I got to go through all this shit combat and I want even be rewarded? This is god damn retarded game design.
No it is superior design.
/sighI didn't even want to add the first Witcher to the curator at first. I think they're pretty poor, overrated RPGs on the whole.
Why even drag TW1 into this? Combat system aside, it was a great game with well-written story and interesting characters.
You can find the benchmark with the hairworks off lower on the page and the performance is still abysmal...The optimization is abysmal.
http://www.pcgameshardware.de/The-Witcher-3-PC-237266/Specials/Grafikkarten-Benchmarks-1159196/
Even a titan x struggles with ultra settings to geat near 60...
A 970 barely gets 40 fps with those ugly ass graphics ,are you fucking kidding me?
Yhea buy NVIDIA cards to get shit performance,that's one way to advertise your shitty ass game...
This test is with hairworks i believe. Hairworks cuts framerate like motherfucker regardless of GPU.
People been playin' TW3 on Ultra locked 60 with single 980 when hairworks was off.
Few games are more overrated on the Codex than TW1. What's weird is how so many people consistently praise it for the things it did worse than its sequel. I mean, I can get people saying "I like it because of its ambitious scope, a big medieval city to explore" or "I like it because of its atmosphere". Those are the reasons I finally added it to the curator. But no, instead they go "good writing".
what was wrong with the first witchers writing?/sighI didn't even want to add the first Witcher to the curator at first. I think they're pretty poor, overrated RPGs on the whole.
Why even drag TW1 into this? Combat system aside, it was a great game with well-written story and interesting characters.
Few games are more overrated on the Codex than TW1. What's weird is how so many people consistently praise it for the things it did worse than its sequel. I mean, I can get people saying "I like it because of its ambitious scope, a big medieval city to explore" or "I like it because of its atmosphere". Those are the reasons I finally added it to the curator. But no, instead they go "good writing".
I'm thinking of getting a new gfx card and I can't think of a reason not to get nvidia since they pay everybody to run the games like shit on the competitors cards =/ it's fucking horribleYou can find the benchmark with the hairworks off lower on the page and the performance is still abysmal...The optimization is abysmal.
http://www.pcgameshardware.de/The-Witcher-3-PC-237266/Specials/Grafikkarten-Benchmarks-1159196/
Even a titan x struggles with ultra settings to geat near 60...
A 970 barely gets 40 fps with those ugly ass graphics ,are you fucking kidding me?
Yhea buy NVIDIA cards to get shit performance,that's one way to advertise your shitty ass game...
This test is with hairworks i believe. Hairworks cuts framerate like motherfucker regardless of GPU.
People been playin' TW3 on Ultra locked 60 with single 980 when hairworks was off.
Mind you those benchmarks are on standard drivers.
After release (usually day or two) both Nvidia and AMD release their profiler drivers which sometimes change FPS a lot.
I think Nvidia released drivers today.
TW2 writing was near-lethally boring watered down nonsense which insta-evaporated from my mind as soon as I quit the game (and I quit it about halfway through, so maybe it gets better closer to the end - I'll never know). If you think that TW2 writing > TW1 writing, I truly don't know what to say...What's weird is how so many people consistently praise it for the things it did worse than its sequel. ... But no, instead they go "good writing".
It is still better than all witcher games. And of course I was thinking about the whole package, not just sword fighting.I guess you didn't play it. Your loss.Star Wars Jedi Academy is still the game with best real time action combat combined with cool powers usage. Why cannot witcher just c/p that combat? They even got jedi like signs for witchers.
wrong i played all of them. They are fun but control scheme is simply bad as it uses same system as Rune where movement of your character decides what strike it uses instead of strikes being predefined to button or movement set.
It is essentially even worse system than TW has. At least in TW character tries to hit something where in this case your attack when you move left will start as left instead of stationary.
Either way system promoted button mash.
Its strength though lied elsewhere. Verticality of combat and augmentation of combat via skills (force jump, pull push etc) which worked excellent compared to sword fighting.
Few games are more overrated on the Codex than TW1. What's weird is how so many people consistently praise it for the things it did worse than its sequel. I mean, I can get people saying "I like it because of its ambitious scope, a big medieval city to explore" or "I like it because of its atmosphere". Those are the reasons I finally added it to the curator. But no, instead they go "good writing".
Never had a problem with Ati cards on any Nvidia sponsored games,only if you enable some of their bullshit option that seems to do nothing most of the time than eating 10-15 fps..I'm thinking of getting a new gfx card and I can't think of a reason not to get nvidia since they pay everybody to run the games like shit on the competitors cards =/ it's fucking horribleYou can find the benchmark with the hairworks off lower on the page and the performance is still abysmal...The optimization is abysmal.
http://www.pcgameshardware.de/The-Witcher-3-PC-237266/Specials/Grafikkarten-Benchmarks-1159196/
Even a titan x struggles with ultra settings to geat near 60...
A 970 barely gets 40 fps with those ugly ass graphics ,are you fucking kidding me?
Yhea buy NVIDIA cards to get shit performance,that's one way to advertise your shitty ass game...
This test is with hairworks i believe. Hairworks cuts framerate like motherfucker regardless of GPU.
People been playin' TW3 on Ultra locked 60 with single 980 when hairworks was off.
Mind you those benchmarks are on standard drivers.
After release (usually day or two) both Nvidia and AMD release their profiler drivers which sometimes change FPS a lot.
I think Nvidia released drivers today.
TW2 writing was near-lethally boring watered down nonsense which insta-evaporated from my mind as soon as I quit the game (and I quit it about halfway through, so maybe it gets better closer to the end - I'll never know). If you think that TW2 writing > TW1 writing, I truly don't know what to say...What's weird is how so many people consistently praise it for the things it did worse than its sequel. ... But no, instead they go "good writing".
Few games are more overrated on the Codex than Pillars Of Eternity.