Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Incline Tim Cain says there are no bad games only different preferences and budgets... Agree? Disagree?

Tim Cain says there are no bad games only different preferences and budgets...

  • I agree. There are no objectively bad games.

    Votes: 2 1.7%

  • I disagree. There are objectively bad games.

    Votes: 116 98.3%
  • Total voters
    118
ind33d

ind33d

Learned
Joined
Jun 23, 2020
Messages
1,256
I agree. I've been having fun scanning 100% of Ixyll II in Starfield with the survival mechanics maxed out while hunting dinosaurs, but it's obvious why the average person doesn't like it.
 
Lyric Suite

Lyric Suite

Converting to Islam
Joined
Mar 23, 2006
Messages
57,175
Utgard-Loki said:
as if we needed more confirmation that fallout and arcanum were flukes.
Click to expand...

I don't think they were flukes as such, more that he wasn't allowed to be a retard back then.

It's easy to say shit like this when your career or the very existence of your company isn't on the line, always on the verge of going under depending on the quality and performance of your game.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom