Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Game News Torment Kickstarter Update #26: Turn-Based Combat Wins

AbounI

Colonist
Patron
Joined
Dec 2, 2012
Messages
1,050
49772-Rick-grimes-yeah-gif-VGBz.gif
 

Esterhaze

Augur
Joined
Jan 15, 2012
Messages
123
The eye for an eye aspect of this with respect to Fallout 3 is more satisfying than I would have expected. Not even sure how much the battle lines overlap but damn if it doesn't feel good.
 

Livonya

Augur
Patron
Joined
Apr 7, 2005
Messages
296
Location
California
I think most of u got traumatized by Dragon Age RTwP but my favorite series from the past all had RTwP: NWN series, Icewind Dale, Baldurs Gate. So congrats u freaking nerds now to combat will really be boring as fuck.

All of which would have been better games if they had been turn based.

Even the best RTwP game ever released could be improved by switching to Turn Based.

I would venture that Planescape Torment was the best RTwP game ever released, so Torment has now has the potential to be better than Planescape.
 

Coyote

Arcane
Joined
Jan 15, 2009
Messages
1,149
How do I withdraw my pledge!! I loathe despise hate Turn Based combat - doesn't matter how you coat it!! Please advice how I can get a refund - I have no interest in this game anymore! Thats a complete turnaround from yesterday!!

I may wait for its release + 1 year until its price drops - but I do not want to associate myself with so much $$ for a game I probably now will NEVER play!!!

InXile - please suggest forums for refund!!

So ends my anticipation for the game. This is the last time I pledge for anything in KS - Turn based is NOT The spiritual successor for your previous games!! Had I known frm the start - I would've not pledged a penny!!!
Going to demand a refund!! This is BullS****

Seeing as how this game is straying further and further away from being a "Spiritual Successor" to PS:Torment, and now with the ditching of RTwP (the CORNERSTONE OF THE INFINITY ENGINE), could I have a refund? Because if you guys had be straight with us from the start, I wouldn't have backed the project.

One thing I've just thought of: Your justifications you've listed here for picking turn-based, they do feel like you're saying "Pffft! You were wrong to want RTwP, and here is why", especially points 1 & 3. Its as if someone said "I find turn-based slow and tedious", your response there reads almost "No it isn't, you're wrong, we know best".

Well that does it, I want a fucking refund. I hate, HATE HATE HATE, turn-based with such a passion, that I really hope my request or a refund makes some sort of impact.

What all the TB people forget is that 1. This was advertised as a spiritual successor, it is clearly not now and 2. They did not explain alot in this update, they basically just said that they think TB is best (cheapest).

I can't help but think there was a fair degree of deception in getting funding for this game before announcing the combat system. As of now they have managed to bilk money from a lot of people who will have no interest in actually playing this game when it is released. Some may see that as brilliant from a business standpoint, but I find it rather distasteful.

Wow. Haven't really followed the discussion since I voted quite a while ago. Shocked and disappointed that so many voted for such an outdated, clunky mechanic.

Disappointed that the Dev team even considered changing the mechanic for a significant part of the game from the original.

I think most games in the past could have been made RT they would have been and that games were TB because that was what was possible at the time. To me, this is analogous to electing to be make this game a 2D scroller instead of top-down isometric. Why would you? It's like watching a VHS tape on a 13" tube TV when you have a 50" LED TV with blu-ray,

I will play, of course, but I think the results of this vote really drive home how players/backers shouldn't be calling the shots for crucial game design decisions. My 2 cents.

I'm praying this story has got everything going for it, or this is just going to be a glorified Pokemon...

TB is an immersion killer...there is no argument. You may as well argue that the sun is dark, or that ice is hot. Anyone who says TB isn't immersion breaking, doesn't understand what immersion is.

You are alienating many RTwP fans who played the first game, while rewarding the RTwP haters who have probably never even played Planescape: Torment in the first place. I am sure that practically every backer of this game must at least consider RTwP to be decent, otherwise they would have never even played P:T (I am assuming that almost every backer played P:T).

Your decision doesn't seem very wise to me. Hopefully I am wrong and this decision does not eventually backfire on you, even ever so slightly. I wouldn't be surprised if many P:T fans (backers or not), who hate TB combat, write extremely negative reviews on metacritic because they feel betrayed. Revenge is known to be sweet.

Disaster. I'm not sure I'll even bother playing this now. There was an implicit assumption I made that this would be RTwP like the original Planescape/BG/Icewind. I consider this almost akin to fraud. Caveat Emptor I guess... I won't ask for my money back, because I doubt you give a damn anymore.

But, I will point out that it's an incredibly bad decision that will cost you a huge amount of PR in the long run up to release. It reminds me of when CoD: MW2 was released; just a month before launch they suddenly announced that they were going to screw over the hardcore PC fans by removing dedicated servers from the game in the name of profit. A large number of the more influential players never went back.

I despair for other inXile games now.

The worst part is that I've never completed a turn-based game, but I've completed PT 4-5 times and BG2 8-9 times. I feel like I've been taken for a ride here, my money gone and faith betrayed.

I have played TB games that I have enjoyed. I have yet to play one where I didn't feel that my immersion and the game as a whole wouldn't have been better without TB combat.

No anger here. More a resigned disappointment in gamers in general, and that the game isn't going to be a spiritual successor to PST.

I have my fingers crossed and I am hopeful that this game will still be very enjoyable. I say this, though, knowing that no matter how good it turns out, it would have been even better if it wasn't turned based.

And I have to say I find the statement "We think that even you people who voted for RTwP will like our turn based system in the end." really hilarous. It's almost an insult to the people who have good reasons for their votes.

Well, I'm glad I didn't throw a bunch of money into the kickstarter, else I'd be very upset.

As I said in the poll comments, this game is dead to me if it breaks from the original's combat system (and all infinity engine games). If I want a turn based isometric RPG, I'll play Wasteland, Fallout (originals), Shadowrun Returns, Jagged Alliance, etc. I have no interest in playing a Planescape sequel with a completely different combat system from the original.

Though, it seems like this game is going to be breaking a lot more from the original than just in combat, so thinking of it as a spiritual sequel at this point probably isn't the right thing to do.

Oh well. We'll see what happens in 2 years, but from reading things lately, this is probably going to be another game I pickup at 75% off and not care about too much (or even be very disappointed about and potentially stop playing or not even play it at all).

I hate turn based combat. This decision probably ruined the whole game for me.

Well, I am no longer interested in this game anymore. Lesson for me I guess: Don't back Kickstarters which don't have gameplay videos.

Anyway, this seems like a big bait and switch by the devs. The entire pitch was about was how Torment was gonna be the big spiritual successor to Plansescape. Well, except for this one major point.

Money down the drain.

Boo hiss.

Sorry, but there has yet to be a turn based system in a CRPG that did not massively slow down the game play. I understand that it is your decision, but honestly if that is what you wanted in the first place you shouldn't have bothered with a vote. All this has done is disappoint the RTwP crowd and these are your backers, without whom you wouldn't have a game. From all of your communication the decision had been made when the poll went up. It was just not wise to leave a bunch of your backers with a feeling of having failed.

Had you just said, we are looking at turn based, what are your thoughts, made it n informal thing without an actual poll then I think most people would have been less disappointed.

But instead you turned 47% of your backers into losers.

Quite frankly, I expected InExile to compromise somehow, but like most politicians they seem to take their ~50% as a mandate rather than a sign of a need to compromise, meet in the middle, or truly understand the other group's concerns. I find it especially troubling considering that even with open advocacy and a general tendency among supporters (me included) to trust the developer, they couldn't even martial a true 50% in support of their idea.

In my opinion this does not bode well and the idea of filing a chargeback continues to float around in my head.

Well crap. Now that's disappointing. I wanted to write a long post here but it's quite clear that devs already made their decision and TB crown simply cannot listen to the voice of reason so there's no point in that now. Oh well, and I thought combat in this game will be enjoyable, how foolish of me. :/

@tobi Yes, I just want my refund and I am out of here. This is not what I pladged for. Everything else was said and done.
Its funny how they claim making game for backers while spitting in half of the voters face.
Also I've noticed “spiritual successor “ evolved into "thematical succesor".. Coincidence?

TB is nothing but a glorified chess game! I would not have pledged for this turkey if TB was known!
I loathe despise hate TB and even more so since a large quantity of conteporary RPGs games have TB which I wont touch!!

Not going to touch this game!! You can have my $ considering the firm is ethical !
Striking this game off my anticipated list!

"Ultimately, there are no losers here."

Of course there are - people who wanted a sequel to Planescape Torment. Despite your claims to the contrary, the combat system (and the Infinity Engine) were a huge part of what made Torment the best RPG of all time.

That you've taken the easy way out because it's cheaper is extremely disappointing. You put effort over authenticity.

oh yeah....rofl...inxile you are so greedy...copy and paste a combat system from a game that was already developed by you recently...guess that was smooth move by upper management and the vote was a Hollywood show...that's all I have to say...ill get over it.....you have ruined a classic...thx

Delicious.
 

ERYFKRAD

Barbarian
Patron
Joined
Sep 25, 2012
Messages
29,854
Strap Yourselves In Serpent in the Staglands Shadorwun: Hong Kong Pillars of Eternity 2: Deadfire Steve gets a Kidney but I don't even get a tag. Pathfinder: Wrath I'm very into cock and ball torture I helped put crap in Monomyth
Oh. Wow. The technological limitations thing never loses steam, does it?
And apparently spiritual successor=mechanically identical sequel now?
 
Self-Ejected

Davaris

Self-Ejected
Developer
Joined
Mar 7, 2005
Messages
6,547
Location
Idiocracy
Oh. Wow. The technological limitations thing never loses steam, does it?

It makes me wonder if they have played a PnP RPG, or even a simple board game for that matter. I keep thinking they must all have been born with silver iPhones and iPads.
 

octavius

Arcane
Patron
Joined
Aug 4, 2007
Messages
19,685
Location
Bjørgvin
Personally I'm more concerned about things like encounter design, enemy AI and range of options in combat. As long as it's not pure real time, these things are more important then Turn Based vs RTwP.
I still would have voted for Turn Based, though.
 
Last edited:

Jasede

Arcane
Patron
Joined
Jan 4, 2005
Messages
24,793
Insert Title Here RPG Wokedex Codex Year of the Donut I'm very into cock and ball torture
They were. They don't know what they are doing. Forgive them, it's the lost iPhone generation: they have all the means to learn anything they want at their disposal and access to technology we could only have dreamed off- and use it to make pictures of themselves in the bathroom and write "u r cute" while tweeting.

No, don't forgive them, anyone younger than me sucks.
 

MrBuzzKill

Arcane
Joined
Aug 31, 2013
Messages
694
How do I withdraw my pledge!! I loathe despise hate Turn Based combat - doesn't matter how you coat it!! Please advice how I can get a refund - I have no interest in this game anymore! Thats a complete turnaround from yesterday!!

I may wait for its release + 1 year until its price drops - but I do not want to associate myself with so much $$ for a game I probably now will NEVER play!!!

InXile - please suggest forums for refund!!

So ends my anticipation for the game. This is the last time I pledge for anything in KS - Turn based is NOT The spiritual successor for your previous games!! Had I known frm the start - I would've not pledged a penny!!!
Going to demand a refund!! This is BullS****

Seeing as how this game is straying further and further away from being a "Spiritual Successor" to PS:Torment, and now with the ditching of RTwP (the CORNERSTONE OF THE INFINITY ENGINE), could I have a refund? Because if you guys had be straight with us from the start, I wouldn't have backed the project.

One thing I've just thought of: Your justifications you've listed here for picking turn-based, they do feel like you're saying "Pffft! You were wrong to want RTwP, and here is why", especially points 1 & 3. Its as if someone said "I find turn-based slow and tedious", your response there reads almost "No it isn't, you're wrong, we know best".

Well that does it, I want a fucking refund. I hate, HATE HATE HATE, turn-based with such a passion, that I really hope my request or a refund makes some sort of impact.

What all the TB people forget is that 1. This was advertised as a spiritual successor, it is clearly not now and 2. They did not explain alot in this update, they basically just said that they think TB is best (cheapest).

I can't help but think there was a fair degree of deception in getting funding for this game before announcing the combat system. As of now they have managed to bilk money from a lot of people who will have no interest in actually playing this game when it is released. Some may see that as brilliant from a business standpoint, but I find it rather distasteful.

Wow. Haven't really followed the discussion since I voted quite a while ago. Shocked and disappointed that so many voted for such an outdated, clunky mechanic.

Disappointed that the Dev team even considered changing the mechanic for a significant part of the game from the original.

I think most games in the past could have been made RT they would have been and that games were TB because that was what was possible at the time. To me, this is analogous to electing to be make this game a 2D scroller instead of top-down isometric. Why would you? It's like watching a VHS tape on a 13" tube TV when you have a 50" LED TV with blu-ray,

I will play, of course, but I think the results of this vote really drive home how players/backers shouldn't be calling the shots for crucial game design decisions. My 2 cents.

I'm praying this story has got everything going for it, or this is just going to be a glorified Pokemon...

TB is an immersion killer...there is no argument. You may as well argue that the sun is dark, or that ice is hot. Anyone who says TB isn't immersion breaking, doesn't understand what immersion is.

You are alienating many RTwP fans who played the first game, while rewarding the RTwP haters who have probably never even played Planescape: Torment in the first place. I am sure that practically every backer of this game must at least consider RTwP to be decent, otherwise they would have never even played P:T (I am assuming that almost every backer played P:T).

Your decision doesn't seem very wise to me. Hopefully I am wrong and this decision does not eventually backfire on you, even ever so slightly. I wouldn't be surprised if many P:T fans (backers or not), who hate TB combat, write extremely negative reviews on metacritic because they feel betrayed. Revenge is known to be sweet.

Disaster. I'm not sure I'll even bother playing this now. There was an implicit assumption I made that this would be RTwP like the original Planescape/BG/Icewind. I consider this almost akin to fraud. Caveat Emptor I guess... I won't ask for my money back, because I doubt you give a damn anymore.

But, I will point out that it's an incredibly bad decision that will cost you a huge amount of PR in the long run up to release. It reminds me of when CoD: MW2 was released; just a month before launch they suddenly announced that they were going to screw over the hardcore PC fans by removing dedicated servers from the game in the name of profit. A large number of the more influential players never went back.

I despair for other inXile games now.

The worst part is that I've never completed a turn-based game, but I've completed PT 4-5 times and BG2 8-9 times. I feel like I've been taken for a ride here, my money gone and faith betrayed.

I have played TB games that I have enjoyed. I have yet to play one where I didn't feel that my immersion and the game as a whole wouldn't have been better without TB combat.

No anger here. More a resigned disappointment in gamers in general, and that the game isn't going to be a spiritual successor to PST.

I have my fingers crossed and I am hopeful that this game will still be very enjoyable. I say this, though, knowing that no matter how good it turns out, it would have been even better if it wasn't turned based.

And I have to say I find the statement "We think that even you people who voted for RTwP will like our turn based system in the end." really hilarous. It's almost an insult to the people who have good reasons for their votes.

Well, I'm glad I didn't throw a bunch of money into the kickstarter, else I'd be very upset.

As I said in the poll comments, this game is dead to me if it breaks from the original's combat system (and all infinity engine games). If I want a turn based isometric RPG, I'll play Wasteland, Fallout (originals), Shadowrun Returns, Jagged Alliance, etc. I have no interest in playing a Planescape sequel with a completely different combat system from the original.

Though, it seems like this game is going to be breaking a lot more from the original than just in combat, so thinking of it as a spiritual sequel at this point probably isn't the right thing to do.

Oh well. We'll see what happens in 2 years, but from reading things lately, this is probably going to be another game I pickup at 75% off and not care about too much (or even be very disappointed about and potentially stop playing or not even play it at all).

I hate turn based combat. This decision probably ruined the whole game for me.

Well, I am no longer interested in this game anymore. Lesson for me I guess: Don't back Kickstarters which don't have gameplay videos.

Anyway, this seems like a big bait and switch by the devs. The entire pitch was about was how Torment was gonna be the big spiritual successor to Plansescape. Well, except for this one major point.

Money down the drain.

Boo hiss.

Sorry, but there has yet to be a turn based system in a CRPG that did not massively slow down the game play. I understand that it is your decision, but honestly if that is what you wanted in the first place you shouldn't have bothered with a vote. All this has done is disappoint the RTwP crowd and these are your backers, without whom you wouldn't have a game. From all of your communication the decision had been made when the poll went up. It was just not wise to leave a bunch of your backers with a feeling of having failed.

Had you just said, we are looking at turn based, what are your thoughts, made it n informal thing without an actual poll then I think most people would have been less disappointed.

But instead you turned 47% of your backers into losers.

Quite frankly, I expected InExile to compromise somehow, but like most politicians they seem to take their ~50% as a mandate rather than a sign of a need to compromise, meet in the middle, or truly understand the other group's concerns. I find it especially troubling considering that even with open advocacy and a general tendency among supporters (me included) to trust the developer, they couldn't even martial a true 50% in support of their idea.

In my opinion this does not bode well and the idea of filing a chargeback continues to float around in my head.

Well crap. Now that's disappointing. I wanted to write a long post here but it's quite clear that devs already made their decision and TB crown simply cannot listen to the voice of reason so there's no point in that now. Oh well, and I thought combat in this game will be enjoyable, how foolish of me. :/

@tobi Yes, I just want my refund and I am out of here. This is not what I pladged for. Everything else was said and done.
Its funny how they claim making game for backers while spitting in half of the voters face.
Also I've noticed “spiritual successor “ evolved into "thematical succesor".. Coincidence?

TB is nothing but a glorified chess game! I would not have pledged for this turkey if TB was known!
I loathe despise hate TB and even more so since a large quantity of conteporary RPGs games have TB which I wont touch!!

Not going to touch this game!! You can have my $ considering the firm is ethical !
Striking this game off my anticipated list!

"Ultimately, there are no losers here."

Of course there are - people who wanted a sequel to Planescape Torment. Despite your claims to the contrary, the combat system (and the Infinity Engine) were a huge part of what made Torment the best RPG of all time.

That you've taken the easy way out because it's cheaper is extremely disappointing. You put effort over authenticity.

oh yeah....rofl...inxile you are so greedy...copy and paste a combat system from a game that was already developed by you recently...guess that was smooth move by upper management and the vote was a Hollywood show...that's all I have to say...ill get over it.....you have ruined a classic...thx

Delicious.

I had to stop reading before I lost my mind...
 

Roguey

Codex Staff
Staff Member
Sawyerite
Joined
May 29, 2010
Messages
36,707
1z515s9.png

People who hate turn-based combat pretty much only have awful examples like Fallout, Arcanum, ToEE, and Final Fantasy as a reference. Granted it's hard to find good examples because the dumb western desire to simulate reality largely put an end to games with turn-based tactical combat in the 90s, leaving us with indies of dubious quality and the occasional euro-shovelware.

More of them should probably play Shadowrun Returns. It can serve well as Baby's First Story-Driven TBT-RPG without too much of the obnoxiousness that plagues the ones I listed.
 

Borelli

Arcane
Joined
Dec 5, 2012
Messages
1,305
How do I withdraw my pledge!! I loathe despise hate Turn Based combat - doesn't matter how you coat it!!
Woah woah woah. He loathes despises hates turn based combat? Then why did he even pledge for an RPG? And and old school one to boot? Just what does the think RPG combat entails?
 

ERYFKRAD

Barbarian
Patron
Joined
Sep 25, 2012
Messages
29,854
Strap Yourselves In Serpent in the Staglands Shadorwun: Hong Kong Pillars of Eternity 2: Deadfire Steve gets a Kidney but I don't even get a tag. Pathfinder: Wrath I'm very into cock and ball torture I helped put crap in Monomyth
1z515s9.png

People who hate turn-based combat pretty much only have awful examples like Fallout, Arcanum, ToEE, and Final Fantasy as a reference. Granted it's hard to find good examples because the dumb western desire to simulate reality largely put an end to games with turn-based tactical combat in the 90s, leaving us with indies of dubious quality and the occasional euro-shovelware.

More of them should probably play Shadowrun Returns. It can serve well as Baby's First Story-Driven TBT-RPG without too much of the obnoxiousness that plagues the ones I listed.
They oughta try Silent Storm ffs.
 

Azael

Magister
Joined
Dec 6, 2002
Messages
4,405
Location
Multikult Central South
Wasteland 2
Personally I'm more concerned about things like encounter design, enemy AI and range of options in combat. As long as it's not pure real time, these things are more important then Turn Based vs RTwP.
I still would have voted for Turn Based, though.

This is p. much how I feel too. I'm much more interested in good combat and encounter design than if it's TB/PB/RT(WP) or whatever other form it could be. All other things equal though, turnbased is my favorite. The butthurt from this is so glorious that I'm even more happy they went with TB.
 

Serious_Business

Best Poster on the Codex
Joined
Aug 21, 2007
Messages
3,957
Location
Frown Town
How do I withdraw my pledge!! I loathe despise hate Turn Based combat - doesn't matter how you coat it!! Please advice how I can get a refund - I have no interest in this game anymore! Thats a complete turnaround from yesterday!!

I may wait for its release + 1 year until its price drops - but I do not want to associate myself with so much $$ for a game I probably now will NEVER play!!!

InXile - please suggest forums for refund!!

So ends my anticipation for the game. This is the last time I pledge for anything in KS - Turn based is NOT The spiritual successor for your previous games!! Had I known frm the start - I would've not pledged a penny!!!
Going to demand a refund!! This is BullS****

Seeing as how this game is straying further and further away from being a "Spiritual Successor" to PS:Torment, and now with the ditching of RTwP (the CORNERSTONE OF THE INFINITY ENGINE), could I have a refund? Because if you guys had be straight with us from the start, I wouldn't have backed the project.

One thing I've just thought of: Your justifications you've listed here for picking turn-based, they do feel like you're saying "Pffft! You were wrong to want RTwP, and here is why", especially points 1 & 3. Its as if someone said "I find turn-based slow and tedious", your response there reads almost "No it isn't, you're wrong, we know best".

Well that does it, I want a fucking refund. I hate, HATE HATE HATE, turn-based with such a passion, that I really hope my request or a refund makes some sort of impact.

What all the TB people forget is that 1. This was advertised as a spiritual successor, it is clearly not now and 2. They did not explain alot in this update, they basically just said that they think TB is best (cheapest).

I can't help but think there was a fair degree of deception in getting funding for this game before announcing the combat system. As of now they have managed to bilk money from a lot of people who will have no interest in actually playing this game when it is released. Some may see that as brilliant from a business standpoint, but I find it rather distasteful.

Wow. Haven't really followed the discussion since I voted quite a while ago. Shocked and disappointed that so many voted for such an outdated, clunky mechanic.

Disappointed that the Dev team even considered changing the mechanic for a significant part of the game from the original.

I think most games in the past could have been made RT they would have been and that games were TB because that was what was possible at the time. To me, this is analogous to electing to be make this game a 2D scroller instead of top-down isometric. Why would you? It's like watching a VHS tape on a 13" tube TV when you have a 50" LED TV with blu-ray,

I will play, of course, but I think the results of this vote really drive home how players/backers shouldn't be calling the shots for crucial game design decisions. My 2 cents.

I'm praying this story has got everything going for it, or this is just going to be a glorified Pokemon...

TB is an immersion killer...there is no argument. You may as well argue that the sun is dark, or that ice is hot. Anyone who says TB isn't immersion breaking, doesn't understand what immersion is.

You are alienating many RTwP fans who played the first game, while rewarding the RTwP haters who have probably never even played Planescape: Torment in the first place. I am sure that practically every backer of this game must at least consider RTwP to be decent, otherwise they would have never even played P:T (I am assuming that almost every backer played P:T).

Your decision doesn't seem very wise to me. Hopefully I am wrong and this decision does not eventually backfire on you, even ever so slightly. I wouldn't be surprised if many P:T fans (backers or not), who hate TB combat, write extremely negative reviews on metacritic because they feel betrayed. Revenge is known to be sweet.

Disaster. I'm not sure I'll even bother playing this now. There was an implicit assumption I made that this would be RTwP like the original Planescape/BG/Icewind. I consider this almost akin to fraud. Caveat Emptor I guess... I won't ask for my money back, because I doubt you give a damn anymore.

But, I will point out that it's an incredibly bad decision that will cost you a huge amount of PR in the long run up to release. It reminds me of when CoD: MW2 was released; just a month before launch they suddenly announced that they were going to screw over the hardcore PC fans by removing dedicated servers from the game in the name of profit. A large number of the more influential players never went back.

I despair for other inXile games now.

The worst part is that I've never completed a turn-based game, but I've completed PT 4-5 times and BG2 8-9 times. I feel like I've been taken for a ride here, my money gone and faith betrayed.

I have played TB games that I have enjoyed. I have yet to play one where I didn't feel that my immersion and the game as a whole wouldn't have been better without TB combat.

No anger here. More a resigned disappointment in gamers in general, and that the game isn't going to be a spiritual successor to PST.

I have my fingers crossed and I am hopeful that this game will still be very enjoyable. I say this, though, knowing that no matter how good it turns out, it would have been even better if it wasn't turned based.

And I have to say I find the statement "We think that even you people who voted for RTwP will like our turn based system in the end." really hilarous. It's almost an insult to the people who have good reasons for their votes.

Well, I'm glad I didn't throw a bunch of money into the kickstarter, else I'd be very upset.

As I said in the poll comments, this game is dead to me if it breaks from the original's combat system (and all infinity engine games). If I want a turn based isometric RPG, I'll play Wasteland, Fallout (originals), Shadowrun Returns, Jagged Alliance, etc. I have no interest in playing a Planescape sequel with a completely different combat system from the original.

Though, it seems like this game is going to be breaking a lot more from the original than just in combat, so thinking of it as a spiritual sequel at this point probably isn't the right thing to do.

Oh well. We'll see what happens in 2 years, but from reading things lately, this is probably going to be another game I pickup at 75% off and not care about too much (or even be very disappointed about and potentially stop playing or not even play it at all).

I hate turn based combat. This decision probably ruined the whole game for me.

Well, I am no longer interested in this game anymore. Lesson for me I guess: Don't back Kickstarters which don't have gameplay videos.

Anyway, this seems like a big bait and switch by the devs. The entire pitch was about was how Torment was gonna be the big spiritual successor to Plansescape. Well, except for this one major point.

Money down the drain.

Boo hiss.

Sorry, but there has yet to be a turn based system in a CRPG that did not massively slow down the game play. I understand that it is your decision, but honestly if that is what you wanted in the first place you shouldn't have bothered with a vote. All this has done is disappoint the RTwP crowd and these are your backers, without whom you wouldn't have a game. From all of your communication the decision had been made when the poll went up. It was just not wise to leave a bunch of your backers with a feeling of having failed.

Had you just said, we are looking at turn based, what are your thoughts, made it n informal thing without an actual poll then I think most people would have been less disappointed.

But instead you turned 47% of your backers into losers.

Quite frankly, I expected InExile to compromise somehow, but like most politicians they seem to take their ~50% as a mandate rather than a sign of a need to compromise, meet in the middle, or truly understand the other group's concerns. I find it especially troubling considering that even with open advocacy and a general tendency among supporters (me included) to trust the developer, they couldn't even martial a true 50% in support of their idea.

In my opinion this does not bode well and the idea of filing a chargeback continues to float around in my head.

Well crap. Now that's disappointing. I wanted to write a long post here but it's quite clear that devs already made their decision and TB crown simply cannot listen to the voice of reason so there's no point in that now. Oh well, and I thought combat in this game will be enjoyable, how foolish of me. :/

@tobi Yes, I just want my refund and I am out of here. This is not what I pladged for. Everything else was said and done.
Its funny how they claim making game for backers while spitting in half of the voters face.
Also I've noticed “spiritual successor “ evolved into "thematical succesor".. Coincidence?

TB is nothing but a glorified chess game! I would not have pledged for this turkey if TB was known!
I loathe despise hate TB and even more so since a large quantity of conteporary RPGs games have TB which I wont touch!!

Not going to touch this game!! You can have my $ considering the firm is ethical !
Striking this game off my anticipated list!

"Ultimately, there are no losers here."

Of course there are - people who wanted a sequel to Planescape Torment. Despite your claims to the contrary, the combat system (and the Infinity Engine) were a huge part of what made Torment the best RPG of all time.

That you've taken the easy way out because it's cheaper is extremely disappointing. You put effort over authenticity.

oh yeah....rofl...inxile you are so greedy...copy and paste a combat system from a game that was already developed by you recently...guess that was smooth move by upper management and the vote was a Hollywood show...that's all I have to say...ill get over it.....you have ruined a classic...thx

Delicious.

Holy shit :lol: This is very emotional, very intense
 

Volrath

Arcane
Patron
Joined
May 21, 2007
Messages
4,299
MUH IMMERSHION!!!!

Fuck those people, I'm glad they're the ones getting fucked in the ass for once.
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom