Manmower
Unwanted
Don't you have anything better to do than bait strangers on a videogame board? Is your life so utterly empty and devoid of meaning?sounds of a cavernous vagina queefing
Don't you have anything better to do than bait strangers on a videogame board? Is your life so utterly empty and devoid of meaning?sounds of a cavernous vagina queefing
Don't you have anything better to do than bait strangers on a videogame board? Is your life so utterly empty and devoid of meaning?
more queefing
I don't need to play the beta to know that complaints about "slow pacing" and "too much text" are usually retarded and responsible for yuge decline.I haven't even played the beta...
Why are players so stupid?
Durrrr von Hurrenstein strikes again.
Can an actual Torment fan describe to me why much text and slow pace are considered a problem?
/rolleyesWasteland 2 is the worst CRPG I've ever played.
It reeks of low-budget Kickstarted garbage. Just like WL2. Fargo's a fucking conman, and his garbage company still hasn't managed to produce a solid title. .
I love how these newfags think that moronic unwarranted edginess is the bukkake admittance currency.
/rolleyesWasteland 2 is the worst CRPG I've ever played.
Seriously, what do you have against WL2? If it weren't TB I'd attribute your rabid hatred to RTwP idiosyncrasy so common among codexians, but since it's not the case I'm really curious. I skimmed through your WL2-related posts and found nothing of substance.
So, care to elaborate finally? Or are you just one of those FO fanboys who simply can't get over the fact that nuclear post-apoc CRPG can succeed without being a carbon copy of Fallout?
Wasteland 2 is the worst CRPG I've ever played.
He has a point, just look the latest games from Fargo or Inxile
The Bard's Tale
Hunted: The Demon's Forge
Choplifter HD
Line Rider
Wasteland 2
With that in mind and after playing the beta, all that we can hope from this game is mediocrity at best, it's not gonna live the hype of the tittle and for sure the game will be ripped to pieces in the codex review.
Or maybe they don't give a shit about 'fitting in' and really hate morons who unwittingly serve as apologists for inept devs and inefficient companies?Newfags think that being super-edgy is the way to fit in the Codex. Why do they think like that?
That's no excuse.they were desperate for money
That's no excuse.
Your idealistic world view. I don't think there's anything wrong with that but it's still p. funny.Who am I white-knighting by shitting on crappy devs?
It does sound a bit "meh" but it all depends on how they decide to implement it in the actual game. They need to give you choices that are actually hard to make.This "What does one life matter?" sounds a bit.. meh.
Have you played it? If yes why do I need to elaborate? Quest and area design is pathetic (probably because of the gulf between who designed and who implemented), maps are huge for no reason and filled with copy-pasted encounters (probably because of the early complaints about railroaded area design). Character system is pure shit with redundant stats and assorted bad design like skill points scaling from one stat, quite evidently designed in less than 20 hours by people just willing to replicate typical RPG mechanics. Combat requires no tactics, it's just the same shit always. Add to that a disgrace of an UI that still needed 50 iterations to get there (and got worse with the DC despite claims that console port would not affect PC) horrible camera and muddy 3D graphics that manage to be worse than infinitely better games made by amateur teams of 1-5 people. Wasteland 2 looks and plays like russian shovelware from 2005./rolleyesWasteland 2 is the worst CRPG I've ever played.
Seriously, what do you have against WL2? If it weren't TB I'd attribute your rabid hatred to RTwP idiosyncrasy so common among codexians, but since it's not the case I'm really curious. I skimmed through your WL2-related posts and found nothing of substance.
So, care to elaborate finally? Or are you just one of those FO fanboys who simply can't get over the fact that nuclear post-apoc CRPG can succeed without being a carbon copy of Fallout?
No, that is absurd. There's nothing worse than WL2 there. Unless you're that type of codexer that thinks top down perspective (NOT FUCKING ISOMETRIC) projection and turn-based combat makes anything great.Is not a solid cRPG due to the poor combat system and inconsistent design. They tried to implement a lot of reactivity with trash mobs and timesink activities, it doesn’t make sense. But to say that is the worse is just trolling. It is certainly better than most of the games in the top 70 cRPG list.
Just check my steam account to see last time I played. Wasteland 2 is so bad I asked it to be removed from my account, and it isn't even worth the bandwidth to download a gog version.Excidium is just special. A special autistic snowflake. Don't mind him. He probably secretly plays a ton of WL2
This made me chuckle."What can change the nature of a catchphrase?"
Yup. To be fair, they have Zeits on the team, so here's to hoping he pushes his weight around a bit and delivers something worthwhile. Now if they'd only drop that fat, talentless fuck Pat Rothfuss.On one hand, I'm glad they're taking their time instead of dropping a turd like WL2 again...but on the other hand, wasn't this supposed to be done a thousand years ago now?
Apt. And so very true.Wasteland 2 looks and plays like russian shovelware from 2005.