l3loodAngel
Proud INTJ
- Joined
- Nov 19, 2010
- Messages
- 1,452
If the combat is shit, would you say the combat system is solid? It makes any combat build choices pretty pointless.Anyways, the combat system of PST is rather solid. It's just that the fights are rather badly designed and, well, there's no real reason to fight.
You know the difference between a combat system and designers input? While the second statement is just retarded.
D&D was made for turn based. This is not TB fapping, it's just not considering a RTwP rendition "solid D&D".I am tired of this TB fapping.
Breathe, breathe. Just because DnD was made for TB doesn't mean it breaks down being RTwP.
No, because companions give you all those experiences anyways.Builds do matter because you get a totaly fuckign different experience
Is there a difference between hight int and low int build in PST? I mean both game wise and combat wise.
It was designed like that on purpose for the game. Not a bug, just shit system design or incompetence to implement multiclassing.Now what you are describing as ability to solely use only dagger is more of balancing issue or a bug, that's not multiclassing working properly.
It's a design issue not DnD issue.
I have ran PnP campaigns for the 2nd, 3rd, 4th, and 5th editions of D&D. I am well aware of its strengths and weaknesses.Every time I hear DnD bashing I want to puke, not because it is a masterpiece, but because it is masterpiece compared to what's being offered on the market.
So what? Your comments scream clueless.