Well, the Codex keeps giving us valuable lessons. Once you're down to their level, rational reasoning stops to work, and you're just out of arguments...Great, now I'm getting trolled by a retard too. It's contagious.
And that's why a one-man tiny outfit has fast compile times while a giant professional project has awful compile times, because one of them wants to have fast compile times so he and work more and the other doesn't see any reason to aim for fast compile times because he wants a legitimate excuse not to work.I thought that optimizing compile times is bad in professional environments. It cuts down on your downtime you could use for browsing Codex for example.
They don't use Python for high performance applications. It's a scripting and integration language.Instagram? Pinterest? Reddit? Youtube? Google? But hey, if facts hurt, you can always just say they are trolling you.But for a high performance UI and backend, who would seriously chose something like that?
While some Python features and libraries are implemented in fast C and have good performance if used as intended, overall it's abysmal.
c'mon porky the jig is up. Those examples are mostly just junk to steal the life-time of millenials. Our users have much different problems and much more serious demands than clicking through ads and frolic because images automatically have round corners.
... WAAAAAAAHHHHH.... Python suckssss... Smart people only pick it cause they learned it in school (as opposed to Java and C++ which everyone also learns in school), and now everyone is switching to this other language Kaitlyn or Nimrod or Erdurp, which is going to catch up to Python any day now... Sure Python is #1, but Erdurp is already at #35, after being around for only 20 years...
Django is a Python wrapper around C libraries, compiled regular expressions, highly optimized database queries, etc.They don't use Python for high performance applications. It's a scripting and integration language.
While some Python features and libraries are implemented in fast C and have good performance if used as intended, overall it's abysmal.
"They don't use Python for high performance applications. It's a scripting and integration language."
...
"They don't use Python for high performance applications. It's a scripting and integration language."
....
https://instagram-engineering.com/web-service-efficiency-at-instagram-with-python-4976d078e366
"Instagram currently features the world’s largest deployment of the Django web framework, which is written entirely in Python."
Keep going at it, mate! Give it a few days and we'll collectively nominate for you for a Village Idiot tag or something. You've worked hard for it!
Django is a Python wrapper around C libraries, compiled regular expressions, highly optimized database queries, etc.They don't use Python for high performance applications. It's a scripting and integration language.
While some Python features and libraries are implemented in fast C and have good performance if used as intended, overall it's abysmal.
"They don't use Python for high performance applications. It's a scripting and integration language."
...
"They don't use Python for high performance applications. It's a scripting and integration language."
....
https://instagram-engineering.com/web-service-efficiency-at-instagram-with-python-4976d078e366
"Instagram currently features the world’s largest deployment of the Django web framework, which is written entirely in Python."
Go read a C compiler, retard. That's not how it works. It compiles directly into nearly optimal machine code. Assembly (usually inline) is only used in rare edge cases where significant optimizations are still possible, and to wrap specialized opcodes like RDTSC that have no equivalent in any high level language.C is a wrapper around Assembly libraries. Assembly is a wrapper around binary code. Every higher level language is a wrapper around earlier and more primitive languages. Am I starting to get through now?
The company I worked at, before the one I work at now, made database software. The C++ thing I worked on took 3 hours to compile on a 32-core industrial grade workstation.
Just so people can get an idea about compilation times.
Our solution was to use a compilation cluster. But even then it would still take 20-40 minutes.
So 2 Eastern Euros running potato farm middleware, and an Aussie developing kangaroo defecation tracking app
Go read a C compiler, retard. That's not how it works. It compiles directly into nearly optimal machine code. Assembly (usually inline) is only used in rare edge cases where significant optimizations are still possible, and to wrap specialized opcodes like RDTSC that have no equivalent in any high level language.C is a wrapper around Assembly libraries. Assembly is a wrapper around binary code. Every higher level language is a wrapper around earlier and more primitive languages. Am I starting to get through now?
So 2 Eastern Euros running potato farm middleware, and an Aussie developing kangaroo defecation tracking app
I think you've earned this:
Don't bother responding to my posts, I never click "Show ignored content".
Anyone else willing to nominate for a special tag?
I was interviewed by one of those CTOs once. The company shut down a month later and the founder fled the country with a few million dollars embezzled from retarded angel investors and government loans.Ironically, Porky is right that CEO/CTOs of startups picked up Python & Ruby a lot more often in the past; usually these people are hucksters with just enough technical knowledge to be dangerous, so they probably just picked up some dynamic language because other startups did the same, read an article about it, or believed that it would help them produce their v1.0 prototypes faster. What gets forgotten is that 99.99% of huckster-lead startups fail, so there's a large dose of survivor bias in that "brilliant companies use Python" argument... "Brilliant" is also relative — they can be financially successful and still have a net-negative effect on mankind as a whole.
Strange coming from your mouth, as you were the one going down that path in the first place.the more ad hominem your attacks become
Where do you need 50+ million lines of code anyway? I bet these hundreds of people get paid by lines of code they produce... and the rest is history.50+ million C++ LOC database enterprise behemoth compiles quickly.
Are you retarded? Hundreds of people work on these codebases. Hundreds.
Where do you need 50+ million lines of code anyway? I bet these hundreds of people get paid by lines of code they produce... and the rest is history.50+ million C++ LOC database enterprise behemoth compiles quickly.
Are you retarded? Hundreds of people work on these codebases. Hundreds.
If this chart is to be believed... "average modern cars" with 100 mloc.Where do you need 50+ million lines of code anyway? I bet these hundreds of people get paid by lines of code they produce... and the rest is history.50+ million C++ LOC database enterprise behemoth compiles quickly.
Are you retarded? Hundreds of people work on these codebases. Hundreds.
This must be exaggeration right? Linux kernel is 30mils LOC.
Open source tends to be like that, bloated for no reason. Lots of contributors, no one knows exactly what to do, possibly tons of duplicate code etc. C is also prone to duplicate code.Linux kernel is 30mils LOC.
"The Instagram explore page is viewed by 200 million accounts daily."
Where do you need 50+ million lines of code anyway? I bet these hundreds of people get paid by lines of code they produce... and the rest is history.
Strange coming from your mouth, as you were the one going down that path in the first place.the more ad hominem your attacks become
"The Instagram explore page is viewed by 200 million accounts daily."
And what are they doing there? Should I show you a room full of people who care about Instagram?
Those 200 million "accounts" are morons and making the application respond slowly is not a problem in this context but rather considered a positive boon. The only important thing is that everything has rounded edges and they can enter a lot of information about their consumer behavior.
Or are you seriously suggesting that anyone is "productive" there?
Instagram doesn't require "high performance" as in "low latency" and "efficiency". It's all about scalabilty... and wasting huge amounts of CPU in datacenters on Django.Do you even begin to comprehend how much you are strawmanning now? Your initial argument was that no one uses Python for apps that require high performance. Now that I ruined that argument with a simple real life example (one of MANYYYYY), you are arguing what, that Instagram is a not a productive app for the end-user? Lol, nice try kiddo.