Metro
Arcane
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2009
- Messages
- 27,792
visions said:Awesome, I meet the minimum.
visions said:Awesome, I meet the minimum.
The old Aurora engine doesn't utilize multiple cores, so a 3 GHz Pentium IV is faster in this game than my 2.6 GHz Quadcore. I've read that Act III uses a metric fuckton of NPC scripts that are very heavy on the CPU, so you have to go around at night when everyone sleeps to get acceptable framerates. Made me put down the game a week ago, although I've enjoyed the first two acts.commie said:Falkner said:Now let's hope that it will also be well optimised and those specs are actually worth anything. I'm somewhere between required and recommended for this and I can't even get 30 fps in Act III of the first game.
What the hell? I had pretty much exactly the minimum specs and even a crappier card 7900 GT, and I only had a bit of slowdown with the beast and some of the more elaborate cutscenes in TW1. I also ran on everything at max, though limited to a resolution of 1024x768.
commie said:Falkner said:Now let's hope that it will also be well optimised and those specs are actually worth anything. I'm somewhere between required and recommended for this and I can't even get 30 fps in Act III of the first game.
What the hell? I had pretty much exactly the minimum specs and even a crappier card 7900 GT, and I only had a bit of slowdown with the beast and some of the more elaborate cutscenes in TW1. I also ran on everything at max, though limited to a resolution of 1024x768.
Gordon Freeman said:I haven't followed the hardware news for quite a time now, but a general feeling that I got, is that differences between graphic card's generations are not what they used to be...
So tell me please, how much of a gap is between my GF 9800GT, and this GF 260 thingie? The real difference I mean, not the benchmark-lover's one.
WalterKinde said:The "expert" sites claim the 5xxx and 6xxx amd/ati cards are now the midrange ones along with the Nvidia 4xx and 5xx series. The listed cards in the specs are now considered by these "experts" to be lowend.
FatCat said:AMD , nVidia and Intel push new products all the time , so developers don't care about optimizing games.Fucking conspiracy , theoretically gtx260 should be able (except dx11) max out all games that come out nowadays if developers would actually care about optimization.
Mrowak said:DO NOT DO IT!!
I don't know your sources but if any of these proves true you're dead meat! My God! Why did I read it?!
fizzelopeguss said:Does it not have an expansion mode in the OSD? if it does you might be able to play games at a res like 1080p, or 1050p. It should be able to scale down and lock it into a nice pixel perfect box in the middle of the screen rather than blowing shit the fuck out.
Have a play around in your OSD and look in nvidia drivers Display> adjust desktop size and position> use display inbuilt scaling.
Probably couldn't even handle the installer.Secretninja said:So I'm guessing my intel atom with 1 gb of ram and integrated graphics should be able to run this?