Wrath of the cringefinder compilation thread

[thesheeep]

thread discussing a game got moved to gaming drama

So are we only allowed to discuss games in GRPG if we're sucking the dev's cocks? Or only if we're discussing visual novels?

I'll give you a hint what kind of nonsense got the thread moved:

reminder:
this poster thinks women can have cocks

these are the people defending wotr

Seriously, dude. Your 15th century educational level is one thing, but posting "hurrdurr this poster disagrees on me with sth btw" and wondering what kind of attitudes and postings get a thread moved?

Be happy the mods in this place even let bullshit like yours fly at all and not just remove the source of the trouble like they would in most other places.

 

[rusty_shackleford]

thread discussing a game got moved to gaming drama

So are we only allowed to discuss games in GRPG if we're sucking the dev's cocks? Or only if we're discussing visual novels?

I'll give you a hint what kind of nonsense got the thread moved:

reminder:
this poster thinks women can have cocks

these are the people defending wotr

Seriously, dude. Your 15th century educational level is one thing, but posting "hurrdurr this poster disagrees on me with sth btw" and wondering what kind of attitude gets thread moved?

Be happy the mods in this place even let bullshit like yours fly at all and not just remove the source of the trouble like they would in most other places.

"noooooooo you can't critique games I like! you should be banned!"
yeah fuck off you retarded faggot

 

[Faarbaute]

This is how "centrists" shut down discourse. They bait the discussion into the fringe, which they know is forbidden, then watch the hammer fall on their ideological opponets.

 

[GrainWetski]

thread discussing a game got moved to gaming drama

So are we only allowed to discuss games in GRPG if we're sucking the dev's cocks? Or only if we're discussing visual novels?

You're only allowed to suck the tranny cocks of every propaganda piece game the industry shits out. You know, like a neutral centrist.

By the way, don't you fellow centrist, middle, straddling-the-fence neutrals think both sides are just as bad? One side is destroying movies, games and absolutely everything to push their globohomo politics and the other is pointing out what the former side is doing on internet forums. Basically exactly literally the same thing.

 

[LannTheStupid]

thread discussing a game got moved to gaming drama

So are we only allowed to discuss games in GRPG if we're sucking the dev's cocks? Or only if we're discussing visual novels?

Reminder:

this poster praises DoS-2 and Fallout-76 as top-notch games.

 

[thesheeep]

"noooooooo you can't critique games I like! you should be banned!"
yeah fuck off you retarded faggot

Are you fucking kidding me?
There's a ton to criticize about the game, including the few snippets of agenda pushing in it. And it's done just fine in the other threads.
Especially about the writing - but claiming that SJW propaganda would be a major part of that is just complete nonsense. It is a tiny part - and you have to have regressed to caveman levels if that bothers you so much you cannot enjoy the rest of the game.

You know what you remind me of? The living joke of the gaming world, OAG (well, website is not really living anymore, but I guess the guy still is...):

This is how "centrists" shut down discourse. They bait the discussion into the fringe, which they know is forbidden, then watch the hammer fall on their ideological opponets.

This is how idiots view the world:
Seeing themselves as victims of others/some agenda when it's really just them being idiots which is the cause of their woes.

 

[rusty_shackleford]

Are you fucking kidding me?
There's a ton to criticize about the game, including the few . And it's done just fine in the other threads.
Especially about the writing - but claiming that SJW propaganda would be a major part of that is just complete nonsense. It is a tiny part - and you have to have regressed to caveman levels if that even bothers you.

 

[JamesDixon]

thread discussing a game got moved to gaming drama

So are we only allowed to discuss games in GRPG if we're sucking the dev's cocks? Or only if we're discussing visual novels?

I'll give you a hint what kind of nonsense got the thread moved:

reminder:
this poster thinks women can have cocks

these are the people defending wotr

Seriously, dude. Your 15th century educational level is one thing, but posting "hurrdurr this poster disagrees on me with sth btw" and wondering what kind of attitudes and postings get a thread moved?

Be happy the mods in this place even let bullshit like yours fly at all and not just remove the source of the trouble like they would in most other places.

There are only two genders which are XX and XY. Until scientists and doctors can change the chromosomes you are the gender your DNA says you are. Women can't have cocks as the DNA does not support it. Men can't have vaginas because the DNA does not support it. Yes, there are intersex people that have both genitalia, but one or both are nonfunctioning which renders them sterile. You should get out of fairy tale land and with real science bro.

 

[thesheeep]

There are only two genders which are XX and XY. Until scientists and doctors can change the chromosomes you are the gender your DNA says you are. Women can't have cocks as the DNA does not support it. Men can't have vaginas because the DNA does not support it. Yes, there are intersex people that have both genitalia, but one or both are nonfunctioning which renders them sterile. You should get out of fairy tale land and with real science bro.

You are talking about biological sexes, for which your statements are correct.
Gender is a complex social/psychological/cultural construct, though, for most people "matching" their sex, but not for all.

That is also the reason why e.g. trans athletes competing in women's categories cause such uproar. Nobody (well, there's always a few asshats...) is bothered by their gender, but by their sex very likely giving them an edge.

Things will be a lot easier for you if you stop trying to view sex and gender as the same thing.
I'm not going to go into more detail about this, though, as this place tends to just turn this topic into a never ending cycle of "here is the current state of the science" "Noooo! I refuse to accept the science, because it's not MY science!" etc.
It's pointless.

So I'm outta here before that particular cycle starts again

 

[JamesDixon]

There are only two genders which are XX and XY. Until scientists and doctors can change the chromosomes you are the gender your DNA says you are. Women can't have cocks as the DNA does not support it. Men can't have vaginas because the DNA does not support it. Yes, there are intersex people that have both genitalia, but one or both are nonfunctioning which renders them sterile. You should get out of fairy tale land and with real science bro.

You are talking about biological sexes, for which your statements are correct.
Gender is a complex social/psychological/cultural construct, though, for most people "matching" their sex, but not for all.

That is also the reason why e.g. trans athletes competing in women's categories cause such uproar. Nobody (well, there's always a few asshats...) is bothered by their gender, but by their sex very likely giving them an edge.

Things will be a lot easier for you if you stop trying to view sex and gender as the same thing.
I'm not going to go into more detail about this, though, as this place tends to just turn this topic into a never ending cycle of "here is the current state of the science" "Noooo! I refuse to accept the science, because it's not MY science!" etc.
It's pointless.

So I'm outta here before that particular cycle starts again

Gender is not a social construct and anyone that believes that is crazy. They need to be committed and drugged for our safety. Now if you have anything intelligent to say I'll be listening.

Oh the entire gender definition shows that you're wrong.

c. 1300, "kind, sort, class, a class or kind of persons or things sharing certain traits," from Old French gendre, genre "kind, species; character; gender" (12c., Modern French genre), from stem of Latin genus (genitive generis) "race, stock, family; kind, rank, order; species," also "(male or female) sex," from PIE root *gene- "give birth, beget," with derivatives referring to procreation and familial and tribal groups.

Also used in Latin to translate Aristotle's Greek grammatical term genos. The grammatical sense is attested in English from late 14c. The unetymological -d- is a phonetic accretion in Old French (compare sound (n.1)).

The "male-or-female sex" sense is attested in English from early 15c. As sex (n.) took on erotic qualities in 20c., gender came to be the usual English word for "sex of a human being," in which use it was at first regarded as colloquial or humorous. Later often in feminist writing with reference to social attributes as much as biological qualities; this sense first attested 1963. Gender-bender is from 1977, popularized from 1980, with reference to pop star David Bowie.

https://www.etymonline.com/word/gender

Insane people like you tried to change the definition. The problem is that gender means the same thing as sex.

 

[Shaki]

This is how "centrists" shut down discourse. They bait the discussion into the fringe, which they know is forbidden, then watch the hammer fall on their ideological opponets.

True, and you fall for it every time. Just more evidence that centrism is intellectually superior

 

[Faarbaute]

This is how "centrists" shut down discourse. They bait the discussion into the fringe, which they know is forbidden, then watch the hammer fall on their ideological opponets.

True, and you fall for it every time. Just more evidence that centrism is intellectually superior

You disgust me.

 

[Seigneur Locklear]

Gender is a complex social/psychological/cultural construct

Hey, you got at least something right.

 

[MartinK]

There are only two genders which are XX and XY. Until scientists and doctors can change the chromosomes you are the gender your DNA says you are. Women can't have cocks as the DNA does not support it. Men can't have vaginas because the DNA does not support it. Yes, there are intersex people that have both genitalia, but one or both are nonfunctioning which renders them sterile. You should get out of fairy tale land and with real science bro.

Nonsense. Gender is essential property not chemical property. It is perfectly possible to have any sort of abberant gonosomes in your cells and be either man or woman. However it is not possible to be both as well as be of null essence or some sort of third essence for the cosmos consists of two oposite essences and to intermingle them is to cause its divine order to unrevel into primal chaos.

 

[Parsifarka]

The sociological gender is an Anglo disease of the mind. Among civilized peoples men and women have sex, words gender and categories genre/genus. Albion should have remained forever their asylum, now they have spread their filth around the globe.

 

[rusty_shackleford]

The sociological gender is an Anglo disease of the mind. Among civilized peoples men and women have sex, words gender and categories genre/genus. Albion should have remained forever their asylum, now they have spread their filth around the globe.

gender was a synonym for sex in the english language when referring to humans until a pedophile came along and made up a bunch of studies while taking pictures of pedoshit and caused a guy to kill himself after causing psychological torture to him for decades
http://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/gender
http://triggs.djvu.org/century-dictionary.com/djvu2jpgframes.php?volno=03&page=705&query=gender

The entire argument that gender is sociological and not biological is the result of academic fraud and concealing evidence that showed otherwise.

 

[JamesDixon]

There are only two genders which are XX and XY. Until scientists and doctors can change the chromosomes you are the gender your DNA says you are. Women can't have cocks as the DNA does not support it. Men can't have vaginas because the DNA does not support it. Yes, there are intersex people that have both genitalia, but one or both are nonfunctioning which renders them sterile. You should get out of fairy tale land and with real science bro.

Nonsense. Gender is essential property not chemical property. It is perfectly possible to have any sort of abberant gonosomes in your cells and be either man or woman. However it is not possible to be both as well as be of null essence or some sort of third essence for the cosmos consists of two oposite essences and to intermingle them is to cause its divine order to unrevel into primal chaos.

Except that science says differently. You're an idiot.

 

[MartinK]

Except that science says differently. You're an idiot.

Science has no explanation for something as simple as consciousness. Man must turn to magick and religion for real truth.

 

[JamesDixon]

Except that science says differently. You're an idiot.

Science has no explanation for something as simple as consciousness. Man must turn to magick and religion for real truth.

Oh yes the infamous false dichotomy of religion and science. Here's a secret. There isn't one as there are more religious folks that are scientists then atheists. In fact, Christianity and Judaism have long ties going back thousands of years in the sciences. Even the scripture utilizes science. So where does that leave you? Holding an invalid argument and looking like an utter moron.

 

[MartinK]

Even the scripture utilizes science.

Hahahahahahaha. No. There was no such thing as science when the bible was compiled. There wasn’t even the philosophical foundation for science. You are ingnorant fool. You also know shit about biology as XY gonadal dysgenesis destroy your argument utterly.

 

[Zeriel]

Even the scripture utilizes science.

Hahahahahahaha. No. There was no such thing as science when the bible was compiled. There wasn’t even the philosophical foundation for science. You are ingnorant fool. You also know shit about biology as XY gonadal dysgenesis destroy your argument utterly.

The foundation of science comes from the Renaissance, which in turn was caused by rediscovering the teachings, literature, and thinking of pre-Christian culture, so you couldn't be more wrong.

It is not Christian, but it is ancient.

 

[JamesDixon]

Even the scripture utilizes science.

Hahahahahahaha. No. There was no such thing as science when the bible was compiled. There wasn’t even the philosophical foundation for science. You are ingnorant fool. You also know shit about biology as XY gonadal dysgenesis destroy your argument utterly.

Yes there was. Abraham was a mathematician and astronomer which is why he was run out of Ur. There is the matter of Psalms 19 written by King David describing the workings of the universe that was confirmed with our modern satellites. I didn't even mention cloning that was done in Genesis 2 where Eve was created from the rib of Adam.

Psalms 19

1 The heavens declare the glory of God;
the skies proclaim the work of his hands.
2 Day after day they pour forth speech;
night after night they reveal knowledge.
3 They have no speech, they use no words;
no sound is heard from them.
4 Yet their voice goes out into all the earth,
their words to the ends of the world.
In the heavens God has pitched a tent for the sun.
5 It is like a bridegroom coming out of his chamber,
like a champion rejoicing to run his course.
6 It rises at one end of the heavens
and makes its circuit to the other;
nothing is deprived of its warmth.

7 The law of the Lord is perfect,
refreshing the soul.
The statutes of the Lord are trustworthy,
making wise the simple.
8 The precepts of the Lord are right,
giving joy to the heart.
The commands of the Lord are radiant,
giving light to the eyes.
9 The fear of the Lord is pure,
enduring forever.
The decrees of the Lord are firm,
and all of them are righteous.

10 They are more precious than gold,
than much pure gold;
they are sweeter than honey,
than honey from the honeycomb.

As you can see that David is discussing the solar system and how it all works. He also talks about the laws of science and how Yahweh set them down. Not bad for someone alive in between 1040 and 970 BC with Iron Age technology.

I already dealt with XY gonadal dysgenesis and other intersex persons. They are sterile and have the genitalia of one or both genders. They are classified according to their chromosomal pairing of XY or XX.

The only ignorant person here is you.

 

[JamesDixon]

Even the scripture utilizes science.

Hahahahahahaha. No. There was no such thing as science when the bible was compiled. There wasn’t even the philosophical foundation for science. You are ingnorant fool. You also know shit about biology as XY gonadal dysgenesis destroy your argument utterly.

The foundation of science comes from the Renaissance, which in turn was caused by rediscovering the teachings, literature, and thinking of pre-Christian culture, so you couldn't be more wrong.

It is not Christian, but it is ancient.

The modern foundation not the actual beginning. That goes back to 2000 BC and prior.

 

[MartinK]

rediscovering the teachings, literature, and thinking of pre-Christian culture, so you couldn't be more wrong.

What rediscovery? That knowledge was never lost in the first place. Renaissance was caused not by "rediscovering lost ancient wisdom" but by socioeconomic situation in Italy at the time.

Yes there was. Abraham was a mathematician and astronomer which is why he was run out of Ur. There is the matter of Psalms 19 written by King David describing the workings of the universe that was confirmed with our modern satellites. I didn't even mention cloning that was done in Genesis 2 where Eve was created from the rib of Adam.

Yeah, yeah, people knew some things. Astronomy, mathematics, geometry, the stuff that a very bright man can figure by himself and that has practical applications. But there was no such thing is scientific method, peer reviews, academic infrastructure... the things we need to have anyhtign resembling science. Also if Eve was cloend form Adam, how come she’s a woman and not man like Adam?

They are classified according to their chromosomal pairing of XY or XX.

This is just plain sadism. Every sensible person will clasify them according to what is actually between their legs. I get that people are worried about transwomen geting to women’s toilets, but you want to send somebody with a swyer syndrome with a feminine appearance, vagina and upper body strenght of a women to men’s toilets. Beseides what about XXX, XXY, XYY?

 

[JamesDixon]

rediscovering the teachings, literature, and thinking of pre-Christian culture, so you couldn't be more wrong.

What rediscovery? That knowledge was never lost in the first place. Renaissance was caused not by "rediscovering lost ancient wisdom" but by socioeconomic situation in Italy at the time.

Yes there was. Abraham was a mathematician and astronomer which is why he was run out of Ur. There is the matter of Psalms 19 written by King David describing the workings of the universe that was confirmed with our modern satellites. I didn't even mention cloning that was done in Genesis 2 where Eve was created from the rib of Adam.

Yeah, yeah, people knew some things. Astronomy, mathematics, geometry, the stuff that a very bright man can figure by himself and that has practical applications. But there was no such thing is scientific method, peer reviews, academic infrastructure... the things we need to have anyhtign resembling science. Also if Eve was cloend form Adam, how come she’s a woman and not man like Adam?

They are classified according to their chromosomal pairing of XY or XX.

This is just plain sadism. Every sensible person will clasify them according to what is actually between their legs. I get that people are worried about transwomen geting to women’s toilets, but you want to send somebody with a swyer syndrome with a feminine appearance, vagina and upper body strenght of a women to men’s toilets. Beseides what about XXX, XXY, XYY?

*Yawn* You failed to actually defeat what I said. You claimed that there wasn't science back then. There was and I used the Tanakh to prove it.

There was the scientific method back then. Do you know why Abraham fled from Ur? Because he taught contrary to what the Chaldeans did. They believed in celestial theology that every god and goddess controlled a planet and moon of their own. That was the priests that were also astronomers and physicists. Abraham went against the scientific method and peer review to the point that the priest-scientists were going to kill him. These same people also had trigonometry long before the Greeks did and it was far more advanced that we don't even know how to do it. Instead of flapping your lips on your cock holster maybe you should pick up some good books on ancient history.

Yes, you are just plain stupid since you look at the exterior and not the actual genetic code. DNA is your body's repair manual and if you screw up your body it will try to repair the damage. That's why men that chop off their cocks and turn it into a sock have an open wound. They have to take immuno-suppressants to keep their DNA from repairing said wound.