AoD was $30, and Disco's got more aesthetically pleasing stuff in it. Partial voice acting, more music, snazzier graphics. $10 difference isn't unreasonable given the fancier production. Underrail is shameful however and you should feel bad bringing it up among a pair of prestigious RPGs. And of course you're talking about the full price of AoD, naturally, because all fans of RPGs clearly purchased both AoD and Disco at launch for full price, right? Right.
Excuse me? Shut your whore mouth you filthy new-fag. Underrail is amazing and filled with content, better than both AoD and DE.
Underrail is literal garbage for number pushers to touch themselves while playing. That's like trying to compare ToME to a proper RPG. Yes, it might technically be classified as one without diving too far into "But what is an RPG", but in your heart of hearts you know it's just called an RPG so munchkins can feel good about their murderhobos.
Imagine being so confused by a RPG system that you try to pretend like it's all about numbers and calculations. Just admit you weren't smart enough to figure it out and move on.
Alright bro. Nevermind the fact that it has some of the best world-building of any RPG ever, and a great story to boot.
Wasn't smart enough to figure it out? I'd take offense except you're attacking your own point. Denying that's it's all about numbers and calculations and then in the same breath saying that I'm a retarded casual who can't hustle those numbers around like a pro to actually play the game, since it's apparently about numbers and calculations enough that a retard such as myself can't handle it.
Not what I said. You supposedly live in Illinois, so you have no excuse for being so bad at reading comprehension. I said that you're so stupid you automatically assumed that Underrail was a numbers game when it really doesn't require any number crunching at all to make a good build that's viable at Hard difficulty, much less normal.
I'm not. The setting of Underrail is unironically great and nuanced, and I enjoyed the story regarding the Faceless and Oculus very much so.
I guess I scrubbed the unmentioned "automatically" there since I've actually played the fucking game and know it's just about jerking off with character builds, then! If you're saying I was scared off by numbers and didn't even play it then we can knock that on the head immediately.
What does this even mean? Yes, the game is about trying out various different character builds and enjoying the combat, but you can reduce any RPG to an oversimplified caricature. Whatever, no point in arguing with someone such as yourself who cannot see incline even when it's right in his face.
You've got your incline and I've got mine, and we're now obliged to fight each-other to the death and allow the Outer Worlds to prosper.
The horror.
Both systems have "interjections" in dialogue and give unique dialogue lines. The relationship system where reactions to dialogue based on tags was a systemic thing was a major new feature for Deadfire. In the end, it changed nothing.
I don't know what "people" you are talking to, but since you are quoting my post...
Did you perceive it as a negative, or do you think the game wanted to present it in such a way as to tell you it's a negative? I remember the phrase and where it was used, but I saw it just as "the game gives me the option to be the kind of guy who would say that". I mean, I felt the game was impartial to this dialogue line.
