Same difference.So is the game better or worse than the previous nu-asscreeds?
No, they should stop making games altogether, disband their studio and leave the entertainment industry.But the ship combat of BF is the better alone than everything else they've done in the series. They should make another game set in the Age of Sail, maybe in the East Indies. The inland exploration could be pretty solid too in that setting.By gameplay Origins onwards is 10x better than what came before. BF only has better ship combat cos the timeline allowed good variety of ships, ship weapons etc.
Oh, its not even close. Rune threw some keywords together, but Soyny did their homework with God of War.Rune (2000)The best adaptation of Norse myth to a story-driven "action" game was God of War.
Witcher 3.Why aren't they making assassin games, why are they making open world crap?
Dude he said that in the review the last zone has required power lvl of 370 and you gain 2 power for each lvl ergo you have to lvl up 135 times to reach that, never played any of the assasins creedz games because i value my time so I cant comment on the story conclusion but knowing Ubitards it was probably shit.Skill Up's review has a few WTF moments in itself. He claims that Odyssey's conclusion was "amazing", for one thing, let alone "better than Valhalla's", which is objectively not true. He also expresses frustration at the fact that "he has to level up 150 times", but if he played the game a bit more he'd see that you essentially gain 2 skill points every time you complete a quest.
Because it's as much an RPG as Witcher 3, GreedFall or Mass Effect (1).Any reason for this being in General Rpg Discussion?
Rumor is that's why they delayed Skull & Bones so significantly. People were angry they could only sail ships, not go on land.But the ship combat of BF is the better alone than everything else they've done in the series. They should make another game set in the Age of Sail, maybe in the East Indies. The inland exploration could be pretty solid too in that setting.By gameplay Origins onwards is 10x better than what came before. BF only has better ship combat cos the timeline allowed good variety of ships, ship weapons etc.
BTW, the nuHitmans have the same disclaimer.there is even a disclaimer that "this game is made by people of all ethnicities, religions and sexual orientations" at the start of all their games
Why aren't they making assassin games, why are they making open world crap?
Because it's as much an RPG as Witcher 3, GreedFall or Mass Effect (1).Any reason for this being in General Rpg Discussion?
Rumor is that's why they delayed Skull & Bones so significantly. People were angry they could only sail ships, not go on land.But the ship combat of BF is the better alone than everything else they've done in the series. They should make another game set in the Age of Sail, maybe in the East Indies. The inland exploration could be pretty solid too in that setting.By gameplay Origins onwards is 10x better than what came before. BF only has better ship combat cos the timeline allowed good variety of ships, ship weapons etc.
Also does the male or female protagonist have the best voice acting?