- Joined
- Jan 28, 2011
- Messages
- 99,628
From the character codex in Wrath of the Druids for the new trader Azar..
Ahem...
Azar as was born into a wealthy Persian family in the city of Shiraz.
Her father recognised her as a shrewd merchant and put his growing commerce in her capable hands.
Due to the attitudes of the male dominated field, she adopted a masculine name and mannerisms which led to her discovery that she was gender fluid.
Her close friends continued using feminine pronouns as per Azars wish
Didn't know they were doing modern day England as well.Azar as was born into a wealthy Persian family
I've only watched the trailer, where Alfred the Great is portrayed as a hateful bigot for not wanting vikings violently conquer England, while the vikings are shown as wise, sensible settlers, who spare women and children while killing the men in their campaign of colonizing an already populated island.
Is the game consistent with the trailer in tone?
This game has some fucking poor writing, it feels like all the lines were written by 6th graders who just wanted to pass their homework assignments. Not even talking about story arcs or anything that major just dialogue lines feels so cheap and uninspiring. I guess hiring writters to meet SJW quota and not because of their talent leads to this crap.
Havent played AC game since Black Flag and its writing wasnt half as bad as it is in ValhallaThis game has some fucking poor writing, it feels like all the lines were written by 6th graders who just wanted to pass their homework assignments. Not even talking about story arcs or anything that major just dialogue lines feels so cheap and uninspiring. I guess hiring writters to meet SJW quota and not because of their talent leads to this crap.
So you're new to the series or just shitposting?
The writing has always been atrocious, with peaks and valleys, but mostly valleys.
AC2 writing:
scene: outside an italian villa
Voice: It's-a-me! Mario!
Havent played AC game since Black Flag and its writing wasnt half as bad as it is in Valhalla
AC2 writing:
scene: outside an italian villa
Voice: It's-a-me! Mario!
That was funny though when playing the game
We taking some regular shmuck or Ivar hinn Beinlausi.Ivar Ragnarrson
I found Valhalla’s main story to be much worse than Origins and Odyssey. Those two at least had understandable if basic stories (revenge and trying to reunite your family). Valhalla in contrast is pants on head retarded. Ubishit wants to portray the Christians as evil while the Vikings are gud boys who dindu nothing. But Eivor and Sigurd are monstrous pieces of shit, who come to England after sperging the fuck out because Sigurd’s dad wasn’t retarded enough to wage a pointless and unwinnable war so Sigurd could be king of a shithole ice field. They come here specifically to conquer the area so Sigurd can be king and Eivor shows why the Vikings are hated as he burns villages to the ground, and murders the shit out of nearby villages and monasteries to get whatever supplies they need. The Hidden Ones who are supposedly about protecting the people from abuse have no problem with any of this whatsoever (although at least Basim does have an explanation for why he doesn’t care, and Haytham is a useless cripple who is a complete fuck up for which he is promoted after Eivor does his job for him). Alfred is the only good guy in this story.So I played it. Well.
TLDR - it's better and worse than Origins and Odyssey.
First, it's a notable step up writing-wise. The first two nuCreeds were classic BSB AAA trash, I didn't give a shit about any of the characters or the world because the writers didn't either. In Valhalla I actually liked many of the characters. Hell, some were outright great. A lot of the ministories gave off straight up Shakespearean drama vibes. Obviously, it's peppered with current day wokeness, a lot of stronk femmyn Viking who don't need no man, but at least half of the NPCs aren't Sub-Saharan African. So it is somewhat less retarded than we expected. I guess that's a plus in this day and age.
I also liked the OST, kindda, someone clearly hired people who know what they were doing.
Itemization is the least bad of all three games. In Origins it was bland and boring, in Odyssey they went full Diablo retard. They tried to find some balance in Valhalla and they kindda succeeded altho why would you ever use anything else than two double-wielded two-handers?
The bad - they promised Valhalla wasn't gonna be as stupidly bloated as Origins and especially Odyssey but this fucking thing is even worse than both. Jesus fucking Christ and all his saints, who is designing this shit? Not only the main map is like 20% bigger than Odyssey, which was already stupidly absurd, but there are FOUR MORE sizeable maps added in the mix1!1 I actually prefer the Valhalla world event system to previous "quests", lethally repetitive and boring as they were, but there.are.so.many.of.them. Fuck.
As I said, I was almost shocked how much less terrible the writing and main story was. That said, even that suffers from the ludicrous omnipresent bloat, since you have to conquer almost 20 separate regions, some of which can take many, many hours to complete. Plus the pacing is retarded. The whole endgame adventure with your bro should've been the climax, but no, you're thrown back into the world and you keep going doing the same shit for a while more. Also when even I could see the Templar Grandmaster coming from a 1000 miles away then everyone could since I'm very bad at seeing things coming.
The combat was p. hard at first, playing at the highest diff., but from 15 hours in I p. much facerolled everything.
Safe to say I'm completely saturated with the nuCreed formula by this point. I'd rather chew off my balls of than buy and play the DLCs. Time to move the fuck on Ubisoft.
Nani?same place as Desmond and will be working with him!