Eternity Avowed - Obsidian's first person action-RPG in the Pillars of Eternity setting - now on Early Access - coming February 18th

[user]

He merely said that freezing and shattering an enemy in a game like this is worth marketing because it's surprisingly not done than often. And he's right. Quit sperging out about it holy moly.

Will shattering enemies be better or even on par with Dark Messiah made 20 years ago? Of course not.

The only thing worth marketting was the environment showcase in that video... certainly not the C&C or combat features, such as loadout capability, dual wield, a cc spell and shattering.

...freezing and shattering and enemy....
Why is there even a debate about this, it's not like it enriches the game or something.

And yet, this is one of the few things that sparkled some positive emotion in me while watching the trailer
Just saying...

Then I am sorry to say that there's a high chance that you are a ... NORMIE. Just kidding, but seriously, would you be happy if it was not mechanically significant and just fluff? Because considering they didn't imply anything of the like, the showcase context and who it seems they are referring to, it probably is.

 

[Harthwain]

Avowed is following in Skyrim's footsteps by removing attributes, which makes it less of an RPG than Diablo.

Sawyer didn't even want to include attributes in Pillars of Eternity and only did so under duress because they promised an Infinity Engine nostalgia title. Avowed with its classless, attributeless system is truer to what Sawyer wanted than what he was forced to deliver.

Sounds like Dark Messiah of Might and Magic, which isn't a bad proposition of an action game. For an RPG though... You really want to up the interactivity to eleven.

 

[luj1]

You are a bloody idiot mate. If Avowed is an RPG then Diablo is too.

Diablo is a clicker, Avowed is an actual game. Might not be a good one, but a game nevertheless.

Avowed is following in Skyrim's footsteps by removing attributes, which makes it less of an RPG than Diablo.

If Sawyer were involved, there would be Balance, but he's not here.

Sawyer would have never even allowed you to shatter a frozen enemy. He essentially removed that effect from Pillars, where being petrified just functions like a generic stun effect, whereas in D&D being petrified and attacked shatters a character, making resurrection impossible.

As banal as Avowed looks, it might have been even worse with Sawyer at the helm.

Slam dunk

 

[Roguey]

Sounds like Dark Messiah of Might and Magic, which isn't a bad proposition of an action game. For an RPG though... You really want to up the interactivity to eleven.

Having attributes didn't exactly make the people on this board fall in love with The Outer Worlds.

 

[jungl]

The problem is what they showed so far does not leave a impression its anything different from outer worlds. Travel a very themey parky looking maps Kill a giant enemy get a giant blob of xp endorphin rush this is so barebones basic gameplay.

 

[Harthwain]

Having attributes didn't exactly make the people on this board fall in love with The Outer Worlds.

Sure? I am just saying it is not a bad idea to have a classless or atributeless system as such. In Dark Messiah of Might and Magic you had to invest points, but you could mix your skills. There is no reason Avowed can't do the same (and be a spiritual successor to Dark Messiah of Might and Magic at the same time). For example, if you invest points into pickpocketing, sneaking, ice magic and archery you're basically creating Garrett. Or you could go with a plate-clad warrior who knows healing spells and fire magic (fireballs!). There is a lot of room for creativity and interactivity in this kind of character-building.

 

[Lhynn]

Avowed is following in Skyrim's footsteps by removing attributes, which makes it less of an RPG than Diablo.

Sawyer didn't even want to include attributes in Pillars of Eternity and only did so under duress because they promised an Infinity Engine nostalgia title. Avowed with its classless, attributeless system is truer to what Sawyer wanted than what he was forced to deliver.

That incompetent buffoon is incapable of having a single creative or interesting idea.
Just imagine someone actually talented and capable with the right sensibilities getting the chances that waste of oxygen got.

 

[Delterius]

are combat mechanics the mechanics by which the ARPG lives and dies

If you're Skyrim you live and die by how many cool vistas you watch, and also there's dragon fights in them.

If you're Dragon's Dogma you live by wether your players can make it through the boring goblins and cyclopes to fight chimeras, drakes and dragons. Also there's cool vistas to watch out for.

Which is to say that a lot of ARPGs are really Action-Adventure games and wether the focus is on interesting fighting mechanics or exploration depends a lot on the game. That said after the Starfield fizzle out it does seem like the Skyrim way of doing things is falling out of favor.

Dunno about y'all but I don't think this bodes well for Avowed.

I'm trying to make up my mind on whether uninteresting combat mechanics in an action RPG result in a walking sim with extra UI elements tacked on camouflaging as if their settings matter.

I think that people find it comfy to just fuck around in large worlds that they actually enjoy being in. And that a big part of it is have it be fun to mechanically explore your game. It's not just about combat. Assassin's Creed doesn't have great combat, but movement and exploration is a joy in that game. Dragon's Dogma does have good monsters, skills and mechanics to interact with, but climbing ledges and movement skills are a joy as well. There's two games where I enjoyed just fucking around in. And that's not even bringing up MMOs I played in the past.

That said, I have cousins and such who were in their early teens when Skyrim came out and it was their first game. So it's not like Skyrim gets away with being a puddle or a walking sim because it's a mainstream game. To some kids, just casting the basic fire spell at some spooky skeleton is already a joy. And Skyrim is not a bad looking world either.

Can a setting carry a game? Yeah. Bloodlines' did.

 

[Silverfish]

Having attributes didn't exactly make the people on this board fall in love with The Outer Worlds.

The attributes in TOW were so barebones, they could have been removed and no one would have noticed. Pure melee builds needed strength and everything else was just flavor.

 

[Delterius]

Personally, I don't measure an ARPG by how intricate the attribute system is. But by how the RPG mechanics interact with the environment. Dark Messiah is a very simple and straightforward game, but the choice of being able to, say, freeze the ground has major implications everywhere. In Dragon's Dogma the size and weight of your character isn't just cosmetic, it means you can't be knocked down, climb monsters, or be kidnapped by flying monsters as easily - to say nothing of your weapon reach.

And before you bring up the Bethesda history of dumbing down their games, I don't really consider Morrowind an ARPG either. Whereas everything that comes after it is are, to me, mostly bad ARPGs.

 

[Quillon]

As if that is such an intricate feature; dismemberment is impressive/cool/harder to make not shattering, melting etc. and I'm sure there won't be dismemberment in Awoken.

Bethouts have dismemberment.

So? What's your point lol? And yeah its an actually cool & expensive feature Obs couldn't implement in TOW along with most other features gamebyro games have/had, if you ask they woulda said "time & budget" with TOW, I wonder what'd be the reason this time.

 

[Hobknobling]

There's on thing puzzling me. Microsoft clearly hasn't given up on PC games. That Ara game is a PC centric title, through and through. MS Flight Simulator as well, Age of Empires is alive and well. When they acquired Obsidian and inXile, I thought they wanted to have studios that would continue their legacy of strong, PC-centric releases. So then, why the fuck are they working on these shitty, console, diet "RPGs" instead of full-fledged, isometric cRPGs?!

You have teams that spent a decade working and perfecting their skills in one type of game, each release was better than the last in technical terms, and then they do a 180 and switch to a completely different style of game, which is evident from the quality of footage in those trailers. It's stupid, both from a business and creative perspective.

Microsoft's market research is actually simpler than you think.
They search for the most popular games, and all they see is 1st person RPG (Skyrim, Cyberpunk 2077) or 3rd person ones (Souls games).

They want the 20 million sales, just simple 3-5 million sales ain't worth it anymore.

Avowed won't reach 3 million sales, let alone 20. Their market research might be good, but people in charge of creative side of things are clearly idiots. Everywhere you look on the internet, no one is optimistic about Avowed, except for die-hard Xbox fanboys and deluded Obsidian fanboys. Even those guys at Digital Foundry, who always say positive things about everything aren't that interested in it. It's simply not captivating, which is a direct consequence of what I mentioned before: forcing people who got really good at doing one thing to change direction, 180 degrees.

Their market research is complete shit and the whole thing is being probably ran by nepotistic Indians, incompetent women with MBAs and other similar retards.

This is one of the key reasons why Gamepass is so damaging to the industry since is centralizes so much power to these fucking leeches.

 

[luj1]

Roguey has such clever, low-key shilling. I'll give him that.

 

[agris]

Microsoft may exit the gaming business if Game Pass subscribers doesn’t increase enough by 2027.

God willing they will miss their target and shut down all their acquisitions

 

[Tehdagah]

Microsoft may exit the gaming business if Game Pass subscribers doesn’t increase enough by 2027.

God willing they will miss their target and shut down all their acquisitions

But Gamepass is great.

 

[Butter]

Gamepass is great precisely because it's costing Microsoft shitloads of money that they won't recoup. Them abandoning the gaming industry will collapse the AAA scene and normies will flock elsewhere. Incline will reign.

 

[Tehdagah]

Gamepass is great precisely because it's costing Microsoft shitloads of money that they won't recoup. Them abandoning the gaming industry will collapse the AAA scene and normies will flock elsewhere. Incline will reign.

I remember Microsoft saying Gamepass is profitable.

 

[Lord_Potato]

Gamepass is great precisely because it's costing Microsoft shitloads of money that they won't recoup. Them abandoning the gaming industry will collapse the AAA scene and normies will flock elsewhere. Incline will reign.

I remember Microsoft saying Gamepass is profitable.

With more than 30 million subscribers it can be, yes.

And why would MS leaving gaming collapse the AAA scene? Most games on Game Pass aren't AAA. There's lot of indies and AAs there and GP money is especially attractive to smaller studios. It's the bigger once like Larian that can tell MS to eat a dick.

 

[scytheavatar]

Gamepass is great precisely because it's costing Microsoft shitloads of money that they won't recoup. Them abandoning the gaming industry will collapse the AAA scene and normies will flock elsewhere. Incline will reign.

I remember Microsoft saying Gamepass is profitable.

With more than 30 million subscribers it can be, yes.

And why would MS leaving gaming collapse the AAA scene? Most games on Game Pass aren't AAA. There's lot of indies and AAs there and GP money is especially attractive to smaller studios. It's the bigger once like Larian that can tell MS to eat a dick.

Did you not see Spiderman 2 costing 300 million? And one of the slides in the Insomniac leak had someone asking "is 3x the investment in [Spider-Man 2] evident to anyone who plays the game?"

If Microsoft leaves gaming don't expect Sony to hang around for much longer too. The entire console market increasingly does not make sense and AAA gaming makes even less sense. Unless it's a live service game like COD. There are good reasons why Sony tried to invest heavily into live service games despite their history of making The Last of Us type games.

 

[ArchAngel]

Gamepass is great precisely because it's costing Microsoft shitloads of money that they won't recoup. Them abandoning the gaming industry will collapse the AAA scene and normies will flock elsewhere. Incline will reign.

I remember Microsoft saying Gamepass is profitable.

With more than 30 million subscribers it can be, yes.

And why would MS leaving gaming collapse the AAA scene? Most games on Game Pass aren't AAA. There's lot of indies and AAs there and GP money is especially attractive to smaller studios. It's the bigger once like Larian that can tell MS to eat a dick.

Well Palworld is on gamepass now so it is saved :D

 

[Lord_Potato]

Did you not see Spiderman 2 costing 300 million? And one of the slides in the Insomniac leak had someone asking "is 3x the investment in [Spider-Man 2] evident to anyone who plays the game?"

If Microsoft leaves gaming don't expect Sony to hang around for much longer too. The entire console market increasingly does not make sense and AAA gaming makes even less sense. Unless it's a live service game like COD. There are good reasons why Sony tried to invest heavily into live service games despite their history of making The Last of Us type games.

Exactly. Sony, CD Projekt, Larian and some other companies are outside Microsoft system, Ubisoft and EA will continue even if Game Pass is done, they even have their own subscription services they need to feed with sporadic AAA. Why would retreat of Microsoft (that really doesn't fund so many AAAs) collapse the AAA market? That's just one actor of many. Sony will still need its system sellers. CD Projekt will still create big, expensive games, with their current plan several at the same time. And so will Ubisoft.

 

[AwesomeButton]

Gamepass is great precisely because it's costing Microsoft shitloads of money that they won't recoup. Them abandoning the gaming industry will collapse the AAA scene and normies will flock elsewhere. Incline will reign.

I'm sad to say it but this is pipe dreams. Idiots are not going to go away. If there is demand, supply will emerge to satisfy that demand. If it's not Microsoft it will be someone else.

 

[Butter]

Gamepass is great precisely because it's costing Microsoft shitloads of money that they won't recoup. Them abandoning the gaming industry will collapse the AAA scene and normies will flock elsewhere. Incline will reign.

I'm sad to say it but this is pipe dreams. Idiots are not going to go away. If there is demand, supply will emerge to satisfy that demand. If it's not Microsoft it will be someone else.

This is backwards. AAA games don't exist because there's a demand. They exist, and so marketing departments drum up the demand.

 

[Readher]

Gamepass is great precisely because it's costing Microsoft shitloads of money that they won't recoup. Them abandoning the gaming industry will collapse the AAA scene and normies will flock elsewhere. Incline will reign.

I'm sad to say it but this is pipe dreams. Idiots are not going to go away. If there is demand, supply will emerge to satisfy that demand. If it's not Microsoft it will be someone else.

This is backwards. AAA games don't exist because there's a demand. They exist, and so marketing departments drum up the demand.

This isn't true. The biggest group of gamers is console casuals that buy a few games per year, and those games are always sports games and/or biggest AAA releases that year. They buy a game because it has "movie-tier" photorealistic graphics and is shilled everywhere, from TV, through city billboards to match stadiums. If you want your game to sell a lot and make loads of money, you need to pander to those people, and thus you need to make AAA games.

The problem is, the quality expectations of AAA have been constantly rising, while developer steadily declined at the same time. This led to a lot of games with AAA budgets but without AAA quality that don't manage to grab the attention of the large casual group and end up underperforming.

 

[Grunker]

I'm not worried about enemy animations at this point, that can get fixed down the line

hopeless optimism

Gamepass is great precisely because it's costing Microsoft shitloads of money that they won't recoup. Them abandoning the gaming industry will collapse the AAA scene and normies will flock elsewhere. Incline will reign.

I'm sad to say it but this is pipe dreams. Idiots are not going to go away. If there is demand, supply will emerge to satisfy that demand. If it's not Microsoft it will be someone else.

This is backwards. AAA games don't exist because there's a demand. They exist, and so marketing departments drum up the demand.

gamerbrain shitwit cope take