Gumar
Novice
- Joined
- Aug 20, 2020
- Messages
- 38
I could say the same for BG2.Agreed. So much potential wasted in Pillars 1. Tons of writing, 99% of it is fluff. Unfortunate. I still enjoyed it but it could of been so much more….Pillars 1 is mostly gloom and doom
Eh?
In a supposed wretched land where soulless babies are born and people killed at birth everyone was treating me with a generic "How may I be of assistance Sir?". Writing is poor and did not support this gloom and doom notion at all.
I remember playing a Death Godlike and encountering absolutely no reaction. I was an abomination that's chased out of town by a pitchfork-wielding mob? It seems not, 'cause all I got during the entire game was one kid asking me if I can see properly
Irenicus was handled laughably.
Most quests were filler.
Most writing was useless. I am pretty sure that those who enjoy Jansen's stories and Minsc's writings are stuck in their 12 year old selves.
No motivation except for hunting for a sister taken by an Eldritch Horror, (who could have easily done whatever he wanted with them)
No explanation of how Irenicus spared the charname when he was demonstrably superior to Cowled Gendarmes.
Pillars 1's dialogues (Eder's musings on morality and Waiden, Aloth's comments on magic and animancy, Pallegina's comments on politics, Hiravas's musings on the wilderness and sex, a man's needs, Griveing Mother's tragic stories) were far more valuable than the useless banter of BG2's companions.
Solving the hollowborn crisis is far more pressing than hunting for a barely speaking sister taken by a supremely powerful wizard whom you can't hope to defeat and then spending an eternity scrounging for money.