Lady_Error
█▓▒░ ░▒▓█
- Joined
- Oct 14, 2012
- Messages
- 1,879,250
From reading some more about it, it seems very unlikely that BG3 will be 1st person RT.
First, they tried to get the license, but couldn't. Then they were approached by Wizards when they were finishing up D:OS 2 - which kind of implies that Wizards liked what they did as far top-down perspective with TB tactical combat is concerned. Having Larian develop a completely different type of game wouldn't make sense.
Secondly, you have a party and this doesn't really work in pure RT. Even if the rest of the party does its own thing, it would still be a clusterfuck.
Thirdly, Larian already said that they want the same or similar kind of environmental interaction as in the D:OS series combat. You cannot really do this in 1st person pure RT either.
Finally, the game is apparently confirmed to be in a revamped D:OS 2 engine. I doubt that converting this engine from TB to pure RT and from top-down to 1st person makes much sense.
So, it may not be shit after all.
First, they tried to get the license, but couldn't. Then they were approached by Wizards when they were finishing up D:OS 2 - which kind of implies that Wizards liked what they did as far top-down perspective with TB tactical combat is concerned. Having Larian develop a completely different type of game wouldn't make sense.
Secondly, you have a party and this doesn't really work in pure RT. Even if the rest of the party does its own thing, it would still be a clusterfuck.
Thirdly, Larian already said that they want the same or similar kind of environmental interaction as in the D:OS series combat. You cannot really do this in 1st person pure RT either.
Finally, the game is apparently confirmed to be in a revamped D:OS 2 engine. I doubt that converting this engine from TB to pure RT and from top-down to 1st person makes much sense.
So, it may not be shit after all.