Like your other SJW allies, you have no agument. Attempting to equate both sides only shows which side you're on.
What's a religion to social justice warriors is to me mostly an issue of politeness. It is generally right to take most people as individuals and let them prove their merit, if they have any, without prejudice or compunction.
However, that ethic is part of a much bigger picture of moral excellence that includes having nerves of steel. Meaning, you can't have such a fragile sense of self that it collapses under small insults and slights, what social justice warriors call a "micro aggression." World is a tough place and you need to have some skin if you want to get through it with your dignity intact.
Creating a world without "micro aggressions" is an implausible, basically fascistic impulse that requires human beings have a far greater level of interest in people and situations they don't (and can't) know anything about than is politically healthy.
Social justice warriors take their concerns so far that paradoxically it becomes as (or even more) insulting as the 'flawed' outlooks it purposes to fix -- the underlying assumption of their beliefs is that 'victims' of micro aggression not only have no perseverance, but don't have the ability to develop perseverance, and
shouldn't have to develop any perseverance.
As far as equating you with them goes, the entire complaint was that social justice warriors have no skin, no restraint, and no sense.
Then we go back to the bottom line: the content in dispute is an infinitesimal amount of content in a game that is
primally meant to be a dungeon crawler with A&AD 2nd Ed rules.
Beamdog probably should have exercised slightly better form in their handling of material old fans hold in high reverence, but that doesn't justify those fans taking their enthusiasm for the game to the level of a cult.
