Grokalibre
Augur
I'm doing a wakanda playthrough but it's kinda unrealistic without having access to spaceships and laser weapons.
I really like the diversity of character models in the game. It actually helps a lot recognizing at first glance who's on the screen. In my experience in England, at least.
And, is it me or are heresies too quick to spread ? Catholicism is basically on its knees at the moment because everybody's turning insularist, cathar or whatever. Wtf ?
Kill them all. God will know his own.And, is it me or are heresies too quick to spread ? Catholicism is basically on its knees at the moment because everybody's turning insularist, cathar or whatever. Wtf ?
Thanks. I thought it was the opposite way around for some reason. It makes no sense to me that wining a religious war somehow makes the victorious faith more vulnerable to conversion by infidels/pagans/heretics/heathens.Winning actually decreases it.
I really like the diversity of character models in the game
Probably for "muh MP balance" reasons.Thanks. I thought it was the opposite way around for some reason. It makes no sense to me that wining a religious war somehow makes the victorious faith more vulnerable to conversion by infidels/pagans/heretics/heathens.Winning actually decreases it.
It makes sense from design standpoint - prevents big faith from becoming even bigger by snowballing everything in their path. What is wrong are the values, because right now Catholicism seems to be the only faith affected so much.Thanks. I thought it was the opposite way around for some reason. It makes no sense to me that wining a religious war somehow makes the victorious faith more vulnerable to conversion by infidels/pagans/heretics/heathens.
Indeed. Your heir is going to inherit big penalty after his father ("opinion of predecessor"). I wonder how big it can get... I know I saw at least -30.Clicking mass execute button was a mistake. I now have cancer.
Clicking mass execute button was a mistake. I now have cancer.
Lol has Paradox ever *really* been about history?Meh. I can't imagine a bunch of 7th century Arabs standing around saying "Hey Muhammad, peace be upon you, look at these vast swathes of territory we've conquered in the name of the true faith. We're a bit bored with the whole Islam thing now, let's try Zoroastrianism instead". If the design of an history-based strategy game contradicts historical plausibility then maybe the design is a bit shit.
Clicking mass execute button was a mistake. I now have cancer.
LOL. Nice. Did this incur more stress? How much do people hate you?
Never, but they have stopped draping their shitty real-time Risk games with history in favor of wacky shit now.Lol has Paradox ever *really* been about history?
Everyone is brown, inbred, and looks like Arnold Schwartzeneger.I really like the diversity of character models in the game
Oh yes, such diversity. Much different. Wow.
I really like the diversity of character models in the game
Oh yes, such diversity. Much different. Wow.
You get the historical framework (the setup, the mechanics, etc.), but as soon as you hit "play" it goes off the rails. Excepting anything else in a not-scripted game is folly. In CK3 Paradox did include game rules, which can force a more historically-strict conditions (such as heresies being limited only to historical ones in their historically-respective regions, for example), so here is that. Still, weird shit is going to happen, because it's a sandbox. I think it's one of the stronger points of the game, rather than a weak point, because it adds to replayability.If the design of an history-based strategy game contradicts historical plausibility then maybe the design is a bit shit.
I have yet to mistake one character for another. Even in your screenshot each character is different, if not by facial features then because of their clothing.Oh yes, such diversity. Much different. Wow.
Yep. Your highest-tier titles are split among your heirs, and in a situation where you have a single king title, your primary heir gets the kingdom as well as your best/biggest duchy (If possible), then other duchies go to other heirs.Noob help here.
Started with Duchy of Estonia in 1066. I managed to get Duchy of Livonia title as well and created Kingdom of Estonia with the initial ruler, now he is approaching very old age and I've started to think about inheritance. Do I understand correctly that this was the best move under the gavelkind inheritance as the primary heir would get the King title and thus the realm would stay together (even though Duchy titles go to other heirs)?
For Confederate Partition the game automatically creates new titles when possible in the event of your ruler's death.In situations where you have the ability to CREATE more of the highest-tier title (In your current case, kingdom) then when you die and succession happens, it may generate and assign the extra title(s) to heir(s) as needed. But that's ONLY for your highest tier. You can't generate duchies out of your ass through succession when you're a king.
When you first become Holy Roman Emperor for some reason your succession law will default to Confederate Partition.
When you found it - maybe. I am talking about when the Holy Roman Empire is already established and you win a vote to become the next Emperor (I started as Czech in 1066). Others have reported similar experiences, so I am assuming it isn't just me.That's strange - I think when I checked the events, it set the succession law to Princely Elective / Male only when you found the HRE.