Grand Strategy Crusader Kings III

[Jrpgfan]

https://www.pcgamer.com/this-crusader-kings-3-player-ate-the-pope/

The real Doritos Pope.

 

[Catacombs]

https://www.pcgamer.com/this-crusader-kings-3-player-ate-the-pope/

The real Doritos Pope.

Literally posted this a few days ago: https://rpgcodex.net/forums/threads/crusader-kings-iii.127793/page-77#post-6901999

Still funny tho.

 

[Fedora Master]

 

[Fedora Master]

 

[Zero Credibility]

Ugh, the tribal conquer county / duchy cb has no distance limit. That explains some of the border gore. Also:

Spoiler

 

[Fedora Master]

See, this I actually like. The emperor actually gave away vassals belonging to my newly founded kingdom on his own.

 

[Fedora Master]

And then again, there's this shit:

 

[fantadomat]

And then again, there's this shit:

Yes,the game is SJW codded,that is not a surprise. It is no womder that all the world end up with female rulers 20 years after the start lol.

 

[Harthwain]

You can grant titles to her husband. That's how you can "land" women from your family (after you marry them in a way that the children will be of your dynasty).

 

[Fedora Master]

You can grant titles to her husband. That's how you can "land" women from your family (after you marry them in a way that the children will be of your dynasty).

Even if the husband is unlanded? And how would that satisfy HER wanting the duchy title.

 

[thesecret1]

I wish I could just force all vassals to go agnatic succession. You NEVER want their titles to pass to a woman, since she just marries some other duke vassal you have, and boom, there you go, an unruly vassal to annoy you and stir shit up. With agnatic, if they run out of heirs, it just goes to you

 

[vonAchdorf]

You can add Male only inheritance to titles before granting them to a vassal. The prestige costs make it not very practical though. Maybe for important / powerful Duchies.

 

[Harthwain]

Even if the husband is unlanded? And how would that satisfy HER wanting the duchy title.

1) Yes. I had unlanded men with good traits married to my daughters via matrilineal marriage and gave them the land, because Catholics can't give lands to women. In the end my dynasty will inherit and there is a good chance they will get good traits out of it.

2) Since her husband will own the title, she should lose the lust for it. It will also invalidate the whole faction.

 

[The Brazilian Slaughter]

View attachment 14550

Tell me about it, in my current game, Galicia was invaded by some Grand Mayor dude. Imagine my surprise when it was by some Swedish Grandmayor invading Galicia because... I dunno?

And then I discovered that the Swedes had returned to worshipping the Aesir and were in fact all Nordic Pagans. What the fuck!

Now those assholes raid Galicia from time to time.

We actually lost a county to that Swedish asshole, because we were all too busy trying to beat the two ongoing islamic invasions of Galicia by giant muslim hordes. My liege is allied to the Danelaw.

Pro: The Danelaw comes to help us crush muslim invaders.

Con: I want to depose my own liege from YEARS but every time I get ready to, something happens - muslim invasion, swedish invasion, no money, and now he's allied to one of the strongest Christian Kings.

FFS!

View attachment 14554

See, this I actually like. The emperor actually gave away vassals belonging to my newly founded kingdom on his own.

Happened with me too, it is very cool.

 

[Fedora Master]

As I suspected I couldn't give the duchy to the husband, he needed a county or barony first. Gave it to some other guy entirely to shut the faction down.

Also, Paradox never changes. This is with diplo range as restricted as possible, by the way.

e: Diplo range doesn't apply of course WHEN YOU HAVE BLOBS OF TERRITORY ALL OVER SOUTHERN EUROPE

 

[Multi-headed Cow]

I converted Spain to Messalianism because I'm reaching my usual Crusader Kings tipping point of "Well, I have a big-ass blob, time to get super incestuous and corrupt and see how long I can hold it together" and Jesus H Christ it's a giant orgy all the time. You think it's bad enough how much cheating goes on in CK3, once your religion actively promotes it it goes berserk. Other than the constant barrage of learning of infidelity (Which my only option essentially boils down to "Why did you even tell me this" because of my religion) and getting propositioned by everyone, the biggest issue is bishophorics aren't being passed down, so every time some random-ass shithead dies in bumfuck nowhere in my kingdom I have to track that county down and assign someone else or else it keeps jacking up my demense.

In the future I'll probably steer clear of fuck'n'suck religions unless I'm a much smaller kingdom. Kind of annoying here.

 

[MajorMace]

Other than the constant barrage of learning of infidelity (Which my only option essentially boils down to "Why did you even tell me this" because of my religion)

Spoiler

 

[IDtenT]

Has anyone succeeded at converting from tribal to feudal and surviving? Currently you're hit with a massive handicap that destroys your kingdom.

 

[fantadomat]

Has anyone succeeded at converting from tribal to feudal and surviving? Currently you're hit with a massive handicap that destroys your kingdom.

What do you mean,the tech? If so i haven't noticed any penalties.

 

[IDtenT]

Has anyone succeeded at converting from tribal to feudal and surviving? Currently you're hit with a massive handicap that destroys your kingdom.

What do you mean,the tech? If so i haven't noticed any penalties.

Men-at-arms go from dirt cheap to unaffordable. Level 1 castles with no buildings in counties. No churches or cities.

The only strategy I can think of is relocating to a place that was feudal to begin with.

 

[Popiel]

Has anyone succeeded at converting from tribal to feudal and surviving? Currently you're hit with a massive handicap that destroys your kingdom.

Well, it killed me last time I tried. It's indeed insanely hard to do correctly. Even maxed out tribal holdings convert to barren feudal wastelands, what the hell is this shit.

 

[Fedora Master]

https://steamcommunity.com/workshop/filedetails/?id=2225107171

Are you sick of every single woman in medieval Europe being raised like they're some kind of e-thot MEGA ♥♥♥♥? Me too.

This mod reducing the chances of married women becoming ♥♥♥♥♥♥ for every single chad that crosses their path. It does this by the following

If your wife is your soulmate they will never cheat
if your wife has a high positive opinion of you she will never cheat (up from -45 for the seducer)
if your wife is your lover the seducer has a -70 (up from -50)
if your wife has a medium positive opinion of you the seducer has a -100 (up from -30)
If your wife has a low positive opinion of you the seducer has a -65 (up from -15
If your wife has a low negative opinion of you seducer has a 0 (up from 10)
if your wife has a medium negative opinion of you seducer has a 5 (up from 20)
if your wife has a high negative opinion of you seducer has a 10 (up from 30)

I also changed it so that the target's opinion needs to be higher to get better bonuses (from capping out at 75 points for a 50 opinion) to instead capping out at 50 points for a 100 opinion.

This should make all of the women in CK3 less of a ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ ♥♥♥♥. Also created a separate mod to disable the bastard generation event that overwrites your heir with a new 'real_father'

 

[MajorMace]

I can't imagine how insecure you gotta be to actually mod a game to lower the chance of being virtually cheated upon, when the religious fervor is fucked, the vikings conquest' lack of restriction is fucked and the partitioning for all but the greeks is fucked.

 

[Hace El Oso]

I can't imagine how insecure you gotta be to actually mod a game to lower the chance of being virtually cheated upon, when the religious fervor is fucked, the vikings conquest' lack of restriction is fucked and the partitioning for all but the greeks is fucked.

One problem at a time. He’s already solved two.

 

[IDtenT]

Exclave independence and non-de jure title destruction just needs to be tweaked for naval paths when it comes to viking conquest. No reason why the King of Sweden would keep a hold on a place in Ireland, just because both can be accessed by sea.

Make the naval paths only one or two hops, to validate something like the Norman Invasion keeping holdings in France after the death of William.