I wish I was kidding: http://www.gametrailers.com/video/debut ... sis/720428
Here's a quick comparison:
Here's a quick comparison:
DarthBehemoth said:Crysis required a NASA computer to run it at the time of release, how are they possibly gonna do this on the consoles?
Cassidy said:
As if graphics were the reason why consoles began bringing decline since Xbawks or mattered more than any other aspect for the enjoyment of a game.
They made all the vegetation disappear just to accomodate it on the consoles.baronjohn said:I wish I was kidding: http://www.gametrailers.com/video/debut ... sis/720428
Here's a quick comparison:
Morgoth said:Looks shit on both screenshots.
I never found anything artistically outstanding in the first Crysis anyway. It's all brown and green poo.
I agree, too.Peter said:I agree with Morgoth. Crysis is impressive technically, but graphics fidelity alone won't get you anywhere. The whole game was just really bland.
While the setting and whatnot are generic, I've never understood the complaints about stale gameplay. Crysis has large and open levels that allow you to approach objectives from multiple angles, it facilitates multiple play-styles at vastly different ranges, with different levels of challenge, it has more environmental destruction and interactivity than any shooter of its time (smashing cars through buildings to kill the dudes inside? throwing guys off cliffs? shooting a tree and watching it fall over and crush someone?), it's got optional vehicle sections that still allow for viable on-foot progression, and has a good deal of variety in terms of level design (dense jungles, open military bases, villages, caves, mines, frozen jungles, the alien tunnels, etc.). The only real issue was the crap story and bland characters, plus the final 1/3 of the game switching into Linear Mode, but otherwise I fail to see any major problems with it that other shooters of its type do better.micmu said:I agree, too.Peter said:I agree with Morgoth. Crysis is impressive technically, but graphics fidelity alone won't get you anywhere. The whole game was just really bland.
Being a few hours long zero replay value totally generic shooter is what killed it for me.
Already done, thanks. Far Cry is basically identical, except it lacks the selection of vehicles, the sci-fi elements are goofier, and the main character's voice is so annoying it literally made me cut my own toes off in disgust. Level design in Far Cry is maybe a tad more adventurous, but pretty much everything it does, Crysis does better. Or do you have some more specific examples to call out?micmu said:Do yourself a huge favor and play Far Cry.
DarthBehemoth said:Crysis required a NASA computer to run it at the time of release, how are they possibly gonna do this on the consoles?
Berekän said: